eklepilkina abandoned this revision.
eklepilkina added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: jobnoorman.
Another implementation was merged to upsteam
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666
__
eklepilkina added a comment.
Gently ping
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
eklepilkina added a comment.
Gently ping
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
eklepilkina updated this revision to Diff 497620.
eklepilkina added a comment.
- [RISCV] Prepare work to be ready for adding separate Zicsr and Zifencei
extensions
- [RISCV] Proper support of extensions Zicsr and Zifencei
- Updated I extension verson
- Fixing after updating
Repository:
rG LLV
eklepilkina added a comment.
@reames Thank you for fixing documentation, missed this
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666
___
cfe-commits mailing lis
eklepilkina added a comment.
Gently ping
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
eklepilkina added a comment.
Gently ping
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
eklepilkina added a comment.
> Maybe multi-lib handling should split into another patch?
I can do this. But if I separate I still can't choose one that should be merged
firstly, they will be needed to merge both at once, because tests will fail. If
separate them right way (fixes for multilibs i
eklepilkina added a comment.
I've created one more patch connected with lto https://reviews.llvm.org/D142191
and it also uses attributes of functions as the way to get right TargetMachine
in linker.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D13
eklepilkina added a comment.
> How does this affect LTO?
More detailed answer. We work with bitcode files only when use `lto`. If we
don't use `lto` clang produces `.o` file that are already contains target
information. We don't work with function attributes to get subtarget without
lto.
Rep
eklepilkina added a comment.
> How does this affect LTO?
This problem appeared only under lto as far as it's processed as one module.
> Is this not just one of many symptoms of RISC-V not having the right
> module-level subtarget under LTO, which is a real problem that needs fixing?
Not exactl
eklepilkina added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: luke.
Gently ping
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
eklepilkina updated this revision to Diff 490056.
eklepilkina added a comment.
- Updated I extension verson
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666
Files:
clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.
eklepilkina added a comment.
Thank you for comments!
> The key aspect this patch misses right now is the versioning issue - I is
> still marked as 2.0.
I can update `I` extension version or separate diffrent isa versions as you
mentioned. I can fix comments and make proposed by community chang
eklepilkina added a comment.
We are interested in proper support for `Zicsr` and `Zifencei`. Could someone
look at patch or explain why these extensions were included by default?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141666/new/
https://re
eklepilkina created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: sunshaoce, VincentWu, vkmr, frasercrmck, jdoerfert,
evandro, luismarques, apazos, sameer.abuasal, s.egerton, Jim, benna, psnobl,
jocewei, PkmX, the_o, brucehoult, MartinMosbeck, rogfer01, edward-jones,
zzheng, jrtc27, shiva0217, kito-c
eklepilkina added a comment.
Gently ping
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
eklepilkina added a comment.
@lewis-revill could you please provide the case where the LTO linker would not
receive any information about target features? We met similar problems, it
appears on runtime functions in our cases. I made a small fix for this problem
https://reviews.llvm.org/D139704.
eklepilkina created this revision.
Herald added subscribers: sunshaoce, VincentWu, vkmr, frasercrmck, evandro,
luismarques, apazos, sameer.abuasal, s.egerton, Jim, benna, psnobl, jocewei,
PkmX, the_o, brucehoult, MartinMosbeck, rogfer01, edward-jones, zzheng, jrtc27,
shiva0217, kito-cheng, niosH
19 matches
Mail list logo