Most of AVX-512 intrinsics were not supported in 3.8 version and added between
3.8 and 3.9.
In this case, when a BE intrinsic was introduced between releases, it can be
removed, right?
Anyway, we’d better keep the BE intrinsic inside than maintain it in the
autoupgrade.
> Also should we change
I think that AVX-512 intrinsic handled in Clang should be removed from
AutoUpgrade.
If we decide to replace a call to llvm-backend intrinsic with generating LLVM
IR directly from clang, we can remove llvm-backend intrinsic at all.
Otherwise we’ll need to duplicate support in FE and BE for all AVX
Yes, we’ll try make the patches smaller and avoid such mistakes.
- Elena
From: Chandler Carruth [mailto:chandl...@google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 20:25
To: Zuckerman, Michael ;
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org; Demikhovsky, Elena
Subject: Re: r262817 - [CLANG][AVX512][BUILTIN] Add
