Thank you for your detailed explanation!
It would seem perfectly reasonable to define the behavior in this case, at
least (and I suppose not only) to me.
Attila
2016-12-20 14:50 GMT+01:00 Aaron Ballman :
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Attila Török
> wrote:
> > I did not see that it was reapp
I did not see that it was reapplied later, sorry.
With clang version 3.9.0 (tags/RELEASE_390/final) I get the warning in both
c11 and c++11 mode.
With clang version 4.0.0 (trunk 290146) (llvm/trunk 290118) it's gone in
c11 mode, but still there in c++11.
The piece of code I tested it on:
https://g
