efriedma-quic wrote:
And the check for allowConstexprUnknown() isn't catching all the relevant
cases; opened #129845.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/momo5502 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128866
>From bb4091d2f9b7062aa83e5bee2ba525478a7dbd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maurice Heumann
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:31:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Instantiate destructors from initialized anonymous union
efriedma-quic wrote:
Opened #129844 with a case that still fails. Other entry-points to constant
evaluation need similar treatment to EvaluateAsInitializer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lis
Author: Yingwei Zheng
Date: 2025-03-05T14:01:24+08:00
New Revision: 27757fb87429c89a65bb5e1f619ad700928db0fd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27757fb87429c89a65bb5e1f619ad700928db0fd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27757fb87429c89a65bb5e1f619ad700928db0fd.diff
https://github.com/momo5502 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128866
>From bb4091d2f9b7062aa83e5bee2ba525478a7dbd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maurice Heumann
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:31:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Instantiate destructors from initialized anonymous union
tgross35 wrote:
Looks like GCC uses option 3 https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/fM1EbK6Mn.
If you only need something to test against locally, I was able to get our s390x
rust dist built against your patches
https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/13668570835.
`rust-std-s390x-unknown-linux-g
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+namespace t1{
+template struct VSX {
+ ~VSX() { static_assert(sizeof(T) != 4, ""); } // expected-error {{static
assertion failed due to requirement 'sizeof(int) != 4':}} \
+
wangpc-pp wrote:
Agree, we should try the RISCVInsertVSETVLI approach.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -5450,10 +5450,20 @@ bool Sema::SetCtorInitializers(CXXConstructorDecl
*Constructor, bool AnyErrors,
NumInitializers * sizeof(CXXCtorInitializer*));
Constructor->setCtorInitializers(baseOrMemberInitializers);
+SourceLocation Location = Constructor->getLo
https://github.com/tbaederr closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129752
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-05T08:21:51+01:00
New Revision: 107fe0ec6cb36dca6bfafbfdf2996ce38d84e5bd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/107fe0ec6cb36dca6bfafbfdf2996ce38d84e5bd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/107fe0ec6cb36dca6bfafbfdf2996ce38d84e5bd.diff
L
efriedma-quic wrote:
> That said, this patch might be worth having in that branch AS WELL to cover
> any other missed cases. I would be OK having this patch HERE only on that
> branch or replaced with an assert in main.
#128409 should cover all the cases this patch would cover. I'm a little
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja
check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/13222
Here is the relevant pie
michael-jabbour-sonarsource wrote:
Hello,
This seems to cause a noticeable increase in memory consumption on some
examples. See
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/129808#issuecomment-2700015065.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87824
__
@@ -103,11 +103,15 @@ RawAddress CodeGenFunction::CreateTempAlloca(llvm::Type
*Ty, CharUnits Align,
if (AllocaAddr)
*AllocaAddr = Alloca;
llvm::Value *V = Alloca.getPointer();
+ assert((!getLangOpts().OpenCL ||
+ CGM.getTarget().getTargetAddressSpace(getASTAl
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+//===--===//
+//-*-===//
xlauko wrote:
```suggestion
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129072
___
cfe-commits mailing l
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
This fixes breaking the ABI for calls to the kernel enqueue
implementation functions in OpenCL. The ABI passes these by stack
byref or byval, but this was incorrectly casting the stack slot
and passin
HankChang736 wrote:
I tested the following case without passing the 'v' extension in the Clang
command line argument:
```c
__attribute__((target("arch=rv32gcv_zve32x")))
void test_A(int *p) {
asm volatile("" :: "A"(*p));
}
```
The generated LLVM IR result is:
```
; Function Attrs: nounwind
def
@@ -103,11 +103,15 @@ RawAddress CodeGenFunction::CreateTempAlloca(llvm::Type
*Ty, CharUnits Align,
if (AllocaAddr)
*AllocaAddr = Alloca;
llvm::Value *V = Alloca.getPointer();
+ assert((!getLangOpts().OpenCL ||
+ CGM.getTarget().getTargetAddressSpace(getASTAl
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY SparcV8TargetInfo : public
SparcTargetInfo {
public:
SparcV8TargetInfo(const llvm::Triple &Triple, const TargetOptions &Opts)
: SparcTargetInfo(Triple, Opts) {
-resetDataLayout("E-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-f128:64-n32-S64"
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#129836
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129834
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Matt Arsenault
Date: 2025-03-05T13:36:25+07:00
New Revision: 310529065ae9680a9827742e16dd6dd51f00a4f8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/310529065ae9680a9827742e16dd6dd51f00a4f8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/310529065ae9680a9827742e16dd6dd51f00a4f8.diff
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arsenm wrote:
* **#129837** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/129837?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/12983
https://github.com/arsenm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129837
This fixes breaking the ABI for calls to the kernel enqueue
implementation functions in OpenCL. The ABI passes these by stack
byref or byval, but this was incorrectly casting the stack slot
and passing to the use
arsenm wrote:
* **#129834** https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/129834?utm_source=stack-comment-icon";
target="_blank">https://static.graphite.dev/graphite-32x32-black.png"; alt="Graphite"
width="10px" height="10px"/> 👈 https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/12983
frederick-vs-ja wrote:
/cherry-pick 27757fb87429c89a65bb5e1f619ad700928db0fd
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c23 -verify=expected,c -fsyntax-only
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c23 -verify=good -fsyntax-only -Wno-vla
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ %s -verify -fsyntax-only
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -DCARET -fsyntax-only -std=c23
-fno-diagnostics-show-line-
https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
uecker wrote:
And a final comment. While the main motivating use case for you may be VLAs in
parameter declarations (although as heavy user of those, I never felt the need
for such a warning), it would seem the warning would be relevant in cases
where the arrays are not actually VLAs. In ge
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)
Changes
The previous checks missed the new metadata at the end of the line.
Regenerate to avoid future spurious diffs.
---
Patch is 26.38 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/ll
https://github.com/arsenm ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129834
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dtcxzyw closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dtcxzyw wrote:
Closed in favor of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128409
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127525
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dtcxzyw closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127525
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
(Recording myself as reviewer. I have a backlog of several patches in my review
queue, will get to this as time permits.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
@@ -103,11 +103,15 @@ RawAddress CodeGenFunction::CreateTempAlloca(llvm::Type
*Ty, CharUnits Align,
if (AllocaAddr)
*AllocaAddr = Alloca;
llvm::Value *V = Alloca.getPointer();
+ assert((!getLangOpts().OpenCL ||
+ CGM.getTarget().getTargetAddressSpace(getASTAl
https://github.com/michalpaszkowski approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129777
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Discookie wrote:
Ah I see, thanks for letting me know! I'll test a bit more, and add more tests
as well if I find something.
One of the things I could see an issue with, is that technically the nullptr
literal doesn't have a pointee type, since it's a nullptr_t.
Downstream code should be able
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2025-03-04T21:14:07-08:00
New Revision: 024362f413dbfcf8188003762c9cc299f274d76e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/024362f413dbfcf8188003762c9cc299f274d76e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/024362f413dbfcf8188003762c9cc299f274d76e.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129634
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126723
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tgross35 wrote:
I think something like the following precedence would make sense for all
targets:
1. Direct asm: Lower to assembly if hardware support is available
2. Indirect mixed: libcall f16->f32 then asm the second conversion (f32->f64 or
f32->f128) if hardware is available. The advantage
MythreyaK wrote:
Ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128503
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
topperc wrote:
> > But the purpose we add vl/vtype dependencies is to prevent the Post-RA
> > scheduler moving vsetvl instruction across inline assembly. I'm not sure if
> > there's better approach to solve this problem.
>
> Maybe have RISCVInsertVSETVLI add implicit use operands to the inline
topperc wrote:
> I am not familiar with the target attribute implementation, can we get the
> list of function features here and add the clobbers at:
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6d93280aabc2fd132f54e5aa615d25abeadabe7b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp#L3087-L3093
>
>
> cc @toppe
@@ -7380,12 +7380,27 @@ bool
AArch64DAGToDAGISel::SelectAddrModeIndexedSVE(SDNode *Root, SDValue N,
return false;
SDValue VScale = N.getOperand(1);
- if (VScale.getOpcode() != ISD::VSCALE)
+ int64_t MulImm = std::numeric_limits::max();
+ if (VScale.getOpcode() == ISD
wangpc-pp wrote:
> > I am not familiar with the target attribute implementation, can we get the
> > list of function features here and add the clobbers at:
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6d93280aabc2fd132f54e5aa615d25abeadabe7b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp#L3087-L3093
> >
> > cc
https://github.com/farzonl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -103,11 +103,15 @@ RawAddress CodeGenFunction::CreateTempAlloca(llvm::Type
*Ty, CharUnits Align,
if (AllocaAddr)
*AllocaAddr = Alloca;
llvm::Value *V = Alloca.getPointer();
+ assert((!getLangOpts().OpenCL ||
+ CGM.getTarget().getTargetAddressSpace(getASTAl
wangpc-pp wrote:
I am not familiar with the target attribute implementation, can we get the list
of function features here and add the clobbers at:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/6d93280aabc2fd132f54e5aa615d25abeadabe7b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp#L3087-L3093
cc @topperc @4vtomat
HankChang736 wrote:
I tried the test case below without passing 'v' extension in Clang command line
argument.
`__attribute__((target("zve32x")))
void test_A(int *p) {
asm volatile("" :: "A"(*p));
}
`
The generated LLVM IR result is :
`; Function Attrs: nounwind
define dso_local void @test_A(pt
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2025-03-05T11:50:37+08:00
New Revision: c1468e9cbca1002a24772af1a0e7a771f93f6910
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c1468e9cbca1002a24772af1a0e7a771f93f6910
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c1468e9cbca1002a24772af1a0e7a771f93f6910.diff
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126723
>From 21ca76a13ca62715ce98fb2c8b0361df727769b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:13:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Don't give up on an unsuccessful function
instantiat
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+namespace t1{
+template struct VSX {
+ ~VSX() { static_assert(sizeof(T) != 4, ""); } // expected-error {{static
assertion failed due to requirement 'sizeof(int) != 4':}} \
+
@@ -5450,10 +5450,20 @@ bool Sema::SetCtorInitializers(CXXConstructorDecl
*Constructor, bool AnyErrors,
NumInitializers * sizeof(CXXCtorInitializer*));
Constructor->setCtorInitializers(baseOrMemberInitializers);
+SourceLocation Location = Constructor->getLo
https://github.com/shafik commented:
This requires a release note, especially b/c this is a conformance fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/shafik edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ enum class ScanningOptimizations {
IgnoreCWD = (1 << 4),
DSS_LAST_BITMASK_ENUM(IgnoreCWD),
- Default = All
+ Default = All & (~IgnoreCWD)
qiongsiwu wrote:
Comments added.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129809
_
https://github.com/qiongsiwu updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129809
>From 2037abd8cb44be6a70850225626d9fde4b8058f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qiongsi Wu
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:48:20 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update ScanningOptimizations's default so CWD
optimization is
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/12796
Here is the relevant piece o
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129212
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2025-03-05T10:32:19+08:00
New Revision: 68427bc8d808a8f70ed345278fc498a1e0b5a8d2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/68427bc8d808a8f70ed345278fc498a1e0b5a8d2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/68427bc8d808a8f70ed345278fc498a1e0b5a8d2.diff
LO
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
Perfect, TYVM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129212
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129212
>From 8876ef70a08f8547d49b89275a3b1b455221abd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chuanqi Xu
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:03:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [C++20] [Modules] Support generating in-class defined
funct
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> > > Thanks, LGTM.
> > > With just a little more effort you could add the EOF stuff in there too.
> >
> >
> > What do you mean by EOF stuff?
>
> It seems you can deduplicate by moving this block into the scope guard:
>
> ```c++
> while (Tok.isNot(tok::eof))
>
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: A. Jiang (frederick-vs-ja)
Changes
Per P2493R0 and SD6, `__cpp_constexpr` of value `202002L` indicates that
P1330R0 "Changing the active member of a union inside constexpr" is
implemented, which is true for Clang 9 and later.
Fixes #1297
https://github.com/frederick-vs-ja created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129814
Per P2493R0 and SD6, `__cpp_constexpr` of value `202002L` indicates that
P1330R0 "Changing the active member of a union inside constexpr" is
implemented, which is true for Clang 9 and later.
Fixes #129
https://github.com/Bigcheese approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
mizvekov wrote:
> > Thanks, LGTM.
> > With just a little more effort you could add the EOF stuff in there too.
>
> What do you mean by EOF stuff?
It seems you can deduplicate by moving this block into the scope guard:
```C++
while (Tok.isNot(tok::eof))
ConsumeAnyToken();
if
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ enum class ScanningOptimizations {
IgnoreCWD = (1 << 4),
DSS_LAST_BITMASK_ENUM(IgnoreCWD),
- Default = All
+ Default = All & (~IgnoreCWD)
Bigcheese wrote:
I think there should be a comment here with basically what you said in the
comm
https://github.com/Bigcheese edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/129809
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Bigcheese approved this pull request.
Looks good with the added comment.
I was going to say this should also update the documentation, but we don't
actually have any here. This patch doesn't need to add it, but it would be good
to have some documentation on how to actually u
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2025-03-04T14:50:34-08:00
New Revision: fa072bd29a109be424e6f4521823529750a55efe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa072bd29a109be424e6f4521823529750a55efe
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fa072bd29a109be424e6f4521823529750a55efe.diff
L
Author: Jan Voung
Date: 2025-03-04T15:48:42-05:00
New Revision: d6301b218c6698ceb0db1753c8de480d37d11cf8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6301b218c6698ceb0db1753c8de480d37d11cf8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6301b218c6698ceb0db1753c8de480d37d11cf8.diff
LOG
Author: Sam Elliott
Date: 2025-03-04T11:36:16-08:00
New Revision: ee4bc5a8ca94e915a40daddd79237bf3b7520bf9
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee4bc5a8ca94e915a40daddd79237bf3b7520bf9
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ee4bc5a8ca94e915a40daddd79237bf3b7520bf9.diff
L
Author: Andy Kaylor
Date: 2025-03-04T10:50:06-08:00
New Revision: 6f256145c00cef851b2b439e240fbc3eed9413a6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f256145c00cef851b2b439e240fbc3eed9413a6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f256145c00cef851b2b439e240fbc3eed9413a6.diff
L
Author: Peilin Ye
Date: 2025-03-04T09:19:39-08:00
New Revision: 17bfc00f7c4a424d7b5dc6da575865833701fd1a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/17bfc00f7c4a424d7b5dc6da575865833701fd1a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/17bfc00f7c4a424d7b5dc6da575865833701fd1a.diff
LOG
Author: Iris
Date: 2025-03-04T12:07:40-05:00
New Revision: 9e1eaff95b3284ccec71fec70eb9e286c34974c4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9e1eaff95b3284ccec71fec70eb9e286c34974c4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9e1eaff95b3284ccec71fec70eb9e286c34974c4.diff
LOG: [cl
Author: Mariusz Sikora
Date: 2025-03-04T17:52:43+01:00
New Revision: cd3acd1bff02d0100cbe74307f29c00a3874bc41
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd3acd1bff02d0100cbe74307f29c00a3874bc41
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cd3acd1bff02d0100cbe74307f29c00a3874bc41.diff
Author: AZero13
Date: 2025-03-04T08:34:18-08:00
New Revision: 6720465c47303cafcd448c64af97e7b627c399a8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6720465c47303cafcd448c64af97e7b627c399a8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6720465c47303cafcd448c64af97e7b627c399a8.diff
LOG:
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-04T17:14:13+01:00
New Revision: aeca2aa19374d7f70f6f84a99510535b854ec15a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aeca2aa19374d7f70f6f84a99510535b854ec15a
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/aeca2aa19374d7f70f6f84a99510535b854ec15a.diff
L
Author: T-Gruber
Date: 2025-03-04T17:00:55+01:00
New Revision: 9c542bcf0a1b243dd39c2ecffdd7331c15ae0fb1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c542bcf0a1b243dd39c2ecffdd7331c15ae0fb1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c542bcf0a1b243dd39c2ecffdd7331c15ae0fb1.diff
LOG:
Author: Matheus Izvekov
Date: 2025-03-04T12:15:09-03:00
New Revision: 4c4fd6b03149348cf11af245ad2603d24144a9d5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4c4fd6b03149348cf11af245ad2603d24144a9d5
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4c4fd6b03149348cf11af245ad2603d24144a9d5.dif
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-04T16:14:47+01:00
New Revision: 1d8eb436ca694a9e215066e0b2dbd18b2d3943ea
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d8eb436ca694a9e215066e0b2dbd18b2d3943ea
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1d8eb436ca694a9e215066e0b2dbd18b2d3943ea.diff
L
Author: Chris B
Date: 2025-03-04T09:09:44-06:00
New Revision: 9ad515603d97615045470fc4bdc72e1865d2986d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ad515603d97615045470fc4bdc72e1865d2986d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9ad515603d97615045470fc4bdc72e1865d2986d.diff
LOG:
Author: Fraser Cormack
Date: 2025-03-04T14:16:16Z
New Revision: e5d5503e4efa48b61194b1e70e469aba91297bec
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5d5503e4efa48b61194b1e70e469aba91297bec
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5d5503e4efa48b61194b1e70e469aba91297bec.diff
LOG
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-04T15:04:57+01:00
New Revision: f838a5e96cb15f3cd70b2f26db0b520004350c7e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f838a5e96cb15f3cd70b2f26db0b520004350c7e
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f838a5e96cb15f3cd70b2f26db0b520004350c7e.diff
L
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-04T14:07:53+01:00
New Revision: 53d433e702736f9edfee57ec2c1628c729336866
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53d433e702736f9edfee57ec2c1628c729336866
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53d433e702736f9edfee57ec2c1628c729336866.diff
L
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2025-03-04T12:56:42+01:00
New Revision: 43ec9e18938930546e63db41ecda26d3de30e4ea
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43ec9e18938930546e63db41ecda26d3de30e4ea
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/43ec9e18938930546e63db41ecda26d3de30e4ea.diff
LOG:
Author: Timm Baeder
Date: 2025-03-04T12:41:34+01:00
New Revision: 06fc7d68ff816090ea8654a5a0240aa8eb6f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/06fc7d68ff816090ea8654a5a0240aa8eb6f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/06fc7d68ff816090ea8654a5a0240aa8eb6f.diff
L
Author: Discookie
Date: 2025-03-04T10:38:06Z
New Revision: 680391f07a45272bb9bfd385cf4c6846b8be32dd
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/680391f07a45272bb9bfd385cf4c6846b8be32dd
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/680391f07a45272bb9bfd385cf4c6846b8be32dd.diff
LOG: [cl
Author: Nathan Ridge
Date: 2025-03-04T03:46:54-05:00
New Revision: 8266cd9f84b5a7d334ade7ff41393458b3789047
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8266cd9f84b5a7d334ade7ff41393458b3789047
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8266cd9f84b5a7d334ade7ff41393458b3789047.diff
Author: Mariya Podchishchaeva
Date: 2025-03-04T09:17:50+01:00
New Revision: d6942d54f677000cf713d2b0eba57b641452beb4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6942d54f677000cf713d2b0eba57b641452beb4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6942d54f677000cf713d2b0eba57b641452be
Author: Oliver Stannard
Date: 2025-03-04T08:10:22Z
New Revision: a619a2e53a9ba09ba18a047b8389bf4dd1912b72
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a619a2e53a9ba09ba18a047b8389bf4dd1912b72
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a619a2e53a9ba09ba18a047b8389bf4dd1912b72.diff
LO
96 matches
Mail list logo
