llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)
Changes
... for the dynamic blocks created for operator new calls. This way we get the
type of memory allocated right. As a side-effect, the diagnostics now point to
the std::allocator calls, which is an improvement
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118593
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tbaederr created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123900
... for the dynamic blocks created for operator new calls. This way we get the
type of memory allocated right. As a side-effect, the diagnostics now point to
the std::allocator calls, which is an improvement.
https://github.com/HighCommander4 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123818
>From 25fdf43fb182212e859aba806ab32cc25ec466af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 20:59:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][CodeComplete] Use HeuristicResolver to resolve
https://github.com/tangaac updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116771
>From 8abca09066ae8edcfb322fa01cee4ba678fc5ca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tangaac
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:43:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [LoongArch] Support sc.q instruction for 128bit cmpxchg
operation
https://github.com/tangaac deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116771
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -604,6 +610,109 @@ bool LoongArchExpandAtomicPseudo::expandAtomicCmpXchg(
return true;
}
+bool LoongArchExpandAtomicPseudo::expandAtomicCmpXchg128(
+MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI,
+MachineBasicBlock::iterator &NextMBBI) {
+ MachineInstr
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123883
>From 5427c748811041d0878dc4aec8b7b37c4241af37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 20:21:20 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] SubstituteConstraintExpressionWithoutSatisfaction
ne
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/12151
Here is the r
@@ -248,6 +248,25 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseArrayBoundExpression() {
// If we parse the bound of a VLA... we parse a non-constant
// constant-expression!
Actions.ExprEvalContexts.back().InConditionallyConstantEvaluateContext =
true;
+ // For a VLA type inside an uneval
@@ -248,6 +248,25 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseArrayBoundExpression() {
// If we parse the bound of a VLA... we parse a non-constant
// constant-expression!
Actions.ExprEvalContexts.back().InConditionallyConstantEvaluateContext =
true;
+ // For a VLA type inside an uneval
scottconstable wrote:
@sirmc @samitolvanen @Darksonn @lvwr @maurer @rcvalle A gentle reminder to
please review this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
@@ -248,6 +248,25 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseArrayBoundExpression() {
// If we parse the bound of a VLA... we parse a non-constant
// constant-expression!
Actions.ExprEvalContexts.back().InConditionallyConstantEvaluateContext =
true;
+ // For a VLA type inside an uneval
@@ -248,6 +248,25 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseArrayBoundExpression() {
// If we parse the bound of a VLA... we parse a non-constant
// constant-expression!
Actions.ExprEvalContexts.back().InConditionallyConstantEvaluateContext =
true;
+ // For a VLA type inside an uneval
@@ -604,6 +610,109 @@ bool LoongArchExpandAtomicPseudo::expandAtomicCmpXchg(
return true;
}
+bool LoongArchExpandAtomicPseudo::expandAtomicCmpXchg128(
+MachineBasicBlock &MBB, MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI,
+MachineBasicBlock::iterator &NextMBBI) {
+ MachineInstr
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include "clang/AST/StmtObjC.h"
#include "clang/AST/StmtOpenACC.h"
#include "clang/AST/StmtOpenMP.h"
+#include "clang/AST/StmtSYCL.h"
tahonermann wrote:
Hmm, looks like no reason at all. I'm guessing it was once needed for some
X-Macro usage
https://github.com/tahonermann edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122379
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ following requirements.
* Is not a C variadic function.
* Is not a coroutine.
* Is not defined as deleted or as defaulted.
+* Is not defined with a function try block.
tahonermann wrote:
The SYCL specification isn't relevant here as `sycl_k
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+//===- StmtSYCL.h - Classes for SYCL kernel calls ---*- C++
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/tahonermann commented:
> I only saw 1 unresolved, not 2? But I resolved it. Can you point out the
> other?
The other one was [this
one](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122379#discussion_r1910706213);
You gave it a thumbs up, so I went ahead and resolved it now.
https://github.com/tangaac updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116771
>From 8abca09066ae8edcfb322fa01cee4ba678fc5ca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: tangaac
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 17:43:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [LoongArch] Support sc.q instruction for 128bit cmpxchg
operation
https://github.com/pirama-arumuga-nainar approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123856
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2290,18 +2290,21 @@ CXXDeductionGuideDecl *CXXDeductionGuideDecl::Create(
ASTContext &C, DeclContext *DC, SourceLocation StartLoc,
ExplicitSpecifier ES, const DeclarationNameInfo &NameInfo, QualType T,
TypeSourceInfo *TInfo, SourceLocation EndLocation, CXXConstr
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
LGTM modulo nits.
Can we observe that through sema/pch tests?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123875
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
-target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown--"
MaskRay wrote:
Triples with unknown OS default to ELF, so this doesn't really test COFF.
You'll ha
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mc
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: quic_hchandel (hchandel)
Changes
This extension adds eight 48 bit load store instructions.
The current spec can be found at:
https://github.com/quic/riscv-unified-db/releases/latest
This patch adds assembl
https://github.com/hchandel created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123881
This extension adds eight 48 bit load store instructions.
The current spec can be found at:
https://github.com/quic/riscv-unified-db/releases/latest
This patch adds assembler only support.
>From 48e15154af7e8
@@ -1221,12 +1221,34 @@ void CGNVCUDARuntime::createOffloadingEntries() {
? static_cast(llvm::offloading::OffloadGlobalNormalized)
: 0);
if (I.Flags.getKind() == DeviceVarFlags::Variable) {
- llvm::offloading::emitOffloadingEntry(
- M
@@ -2010,6 +2032,25 @@ class CXXDeductionGuideDecl : public FunctionDecl {
/// this is an implicit deduction guide.
CXXConstructorDecl *getCorrespondingConstructor() const { return Ctor; }
+ /// Get the deduction guide from which this deduction guide was generated,
+ ///
antangelo wrote:
I have split the source deduction guide tracking into #123875, and will
continue working on fixing the remaining issues here to land P2582R1 for clang
21.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98788
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: None (antangelo)
Changes
For deduction guides generated from alias template CTAD, store the deduction
guide they were originated from. The source kind is also maintained for future
expansion in CTAD from inherited constructors.
T
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (antangelo)
Changes
For deduction guides generated from alias template CTAD, store the deduction
guide they were originated from. The source kind is also maintained for future
expansion in CTAD from inherited constructors.
This trac
https://github.com/antangelo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123875
For deduction guides generated from alias template CTAD, store the deduction
guide they were originated from. The source kind is also maintained for future
expansion in CTAD from inherited constructors.
This
https://github.com/SixWeining closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
SixWeining wrote:
I prefer #123587 that defaults to relax disabled.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zhaoqi5 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123587
>From 8608d84983580afd13a791bece3ca7b05872b36b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qi Zhao
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:09:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Driver] Pass -X and forward --no-relax to linker
for Loon
https://github.com/zhaoqi5 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123587
>From 8608d84983580afd13a791bece3ca7b05872b36b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qi Zhao
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:09:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang][Driver] Pass -X and forward --no-relax to linker
for Loon
https://github.com/zhaoqi5 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123587
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zhaoqi5 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123587
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MattPD edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123867
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/alexander-shaposhnikov approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123740
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
SixWeining wrote:
Add `--verify-machineinstrs` option as the code calls lots of `BuildMI(...)`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116771
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123719
The reason is, we thought the external explicit template instantiation
declaration as the external definition incorrectly.
---
Full diff: ht
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123871
Close https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/123719
The reason is, we thought the external explicit template instantiation
declaration as the external definition incorrectly.
>From 77cc683b9e0330baf089
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@petr-polezhaev please update the mail address. We don't like github.reply mail
address.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122606
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Given @kadircet is approved and @petr-polezhaev is marked as `first-time
contributor`, I'll merge this by assuming you don't have the commit access.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122606
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
https://github.com/Flandini updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123003
>From 7e0758d2ead53bd4288989b8b2eda218cd6dc34a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Flanders
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 12:34:50 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [analyzer] Add MemSpace trait to program state
This t
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 07d496538f5543a8eed5e207148e28e358b7cca4
1b603f7182fa7ed14bf0aeeb7a40280c990d25bf --e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Matt (MattPD)
Changes
A proposed fix for #95611 [OpenMP][SIMD] ordered has no effect in a
loop SIMD region as of LLVM 18.1.0
Changes:
- Implement new lowering behavior: Conservatively serialize "omp simd" loops
that have `omp simd order
https://github.com/farzonl approved this pull request.
I'm only reviewing commit def10ad82c6e527ba5c3aa29b76041dc94acff1d
The reasoning for the change\fix makes sense. Although I don't like the commit
message. You don't need to amend the commit, but use the github ui to fix up
the commit mess
https://github.com/MattPD created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123867
A proposed fix for #95611 [OpenMP][SIMD] ordered has no effect in a loop SIMD
region as of LLVM 18.1.0
Changes:
- Implement new lowering behavior: Conservatively serialize "omp simd" loops
that have `omp simd
farzonl wrote:
redundant is not the right word here. Irrelevant or not necessary makes more
sense in this context.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123853
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin
https://github.com/hekota updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123394
>From 1d04bfa8e1b138a13acf30c3fc46428d3b260569 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Helena Kotas
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:40:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [HLSL] Fix global resource initialization
Fixes #120636
---
https://github.com/rapidsna updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120674
>From 390d37d9706472e46a34366bcaa519d34496b888 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yeoul Na
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:20:03 +0900
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [BoundsSafety][Doc] Add BoundsSafetyAdoptionGuide.rst
---
clan
@@ -5321,6 +5321,59 @@ class BuiltinBitCastExpr final
}
};
+// Represents an unexpanded pack where the list of expressions are
+// known. These are used when structured bindings introduce a pack.
+class ResolvedUnexpandedPackExpr final
+: public Expr,
+ private llvm
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123395
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang,llvm` at step 7
"test-build-unified-tree-check-llvm".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/17567
Here is t
@@ -654,6 +716,83 @@
ExprMutationAnalyzer::Analyzer::findFunctionArgMutation(const Expr *Exp) {
return nullptr;
}
+const Stmt *
+ExprMutationAnalyzer::Analyzer::findPointeeValueMutation(const Expr *Exp) {
+ const auto Matches = match(
+ stmt(forEachDescendant(
+
https://github.com/5chmidti approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118593
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: AdityaK (hiraditya)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123856.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp (+1-5)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChain
https://github.com/hiraditya created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123856
None
>From 2a117892d87eb272d2d4b6ae9b81ee480d4f555e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AdityaK
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 16:15:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Remove references to mips within Android
---
clang/lib/Drive
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@vtz Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a
problem with a build, you
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vinicius Tadeu Zein
Date: 2025-01-21T16:12:58-08:00
New Revision: 6ab9dafec807a64a4e940bfaecc815e23454dfe8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ab9dafec807a64a4e940bfaecc815e23454dfe8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ab9dafec807a64a4e940bfaecc815e23454dfe8
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Looks great, thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121315
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian` running on `gribozavr4` while
building `clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/1
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-spir-v
Author: Deric Cheung (Icohedron)
Changes
This PR relands [#122992](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122992).
Some machines were failing to run the `reflect-error.ll` test due to the RUN
lines
```
https://github.com/Icohedron created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123853
This PR relands [#122992](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122992).
Some machines were failing to run the `reflect-error.ll` test due to the RUN
lines
```llvm
; RUN: not %if spirv-tools %{ llc -O0 -m
@@ -536,89 +536,84 @@ void CGHLSLRuntime::generateGlobalCtorDtorCalls() {
}
}
-void CGHLSLRuntime::handleGlobalVarDefinition(const VarDecl *VD,
- llvm::GlobalVariable *GV) {
- // If the global variable has resource binding, add i
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `ml-opt-rel-x86-64` running
on `ml-opt-rel-x86-64-b1` while building `clang,llvm` at step 6
"test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/185/builds/11836
Here i
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112714
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang,llvm` at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/11773
https://github.com/Shakil582 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123543
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jyknight approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121943
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/BaLiKfromUA edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123533
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3911,14 +3926,31 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildAtomicExpr(SourceRange CallRange,
SourceRange ExprRange,
}
}
- // Pointer to object of size zero is not allowed.
- if (RequireCompleteType(Ptr->getBeginLoc(), AtomTy,
- diag::err_incomplete_type))
clin111 wrote:
Looks like it was never enabled --- or tested on X86 --- since UseAA was
introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67266. Eventually the dead option was
removed with c266776. Would advise some caution with regards to register
pressure and compile time.
https://github.com/llvm/llv
@@ -13464,6 +13464,14 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnAliasDeclaration(Scope *S,
AccessSpecifier AS,
}
TemplateParameterList *TemplateParams = TemplateParamLists[0];
+// Check shadowing of a template parameter name
+for (NamedDecl *TP : TemplateParams->asArray()) {
+
https://github.com/vsapsai commented:
I've realized that the test doesn't have to be Objective-C, the failure is
reproducible in C. Curiously, we aren't hitting the assertion in
C++/Objective-C++ but I don't know why.
I wanted to try defining the enums in different scopes (e.g. in a struct) an
Icohedron wrote:
> Will a follow-up issue be created to move the useful Sema helpers into a
> common file?
I just created issue #123831 for this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122992
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/galenelias updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123010
>From 9d60d4980f1edbdd4cd4a9499f69e9d225717238 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Galen Elias
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 20:44:10 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Support BraceWrapping.AfterNamespace with
AllowShortNamesp
jroelofs wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123827
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Jon Roelofs (jroelofs)
Changes
This commit addresses some uncertainty raised in
84fa1755a5b7845ddaeaa513a3786013c76c9c88 as to which features Apple M4 has.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123827.diff
2 Fil
https://github.com/jroelofs created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123827
This commit addresses some uncertainty raised in
84fa1755a5b7845ddaeaa513a3786013c76c9c88 as to which features Apple M4 has.
>From 1a97bea824bd6a1595fba2fc394ba9469fc92f8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jon Roe
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/12118
Here is the r
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HerrCai0907 commented:
lgtm. please update the pr title and description before merging. because the
option name is changed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122127
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
https://github.com/jroelofs closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Un1q32
Date: 2025-01-21T13:16:19-08:00
New Revision: 5651544c3647910ddb9f65414b8181f2560b999c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5651544c3647910ddb9f65414b8181f2560b999c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5651544c3647910ddb9f65414b8181f2560b999c.diff
LOG: M
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123433
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
> > Shouldn't there be a pointer-vs-intty difference in the LLVM-IR here?
>
> No, because in this case tryEmitAbstract() is only using the size of the type
> that's passed in. After a few visits, it eventually calls this function:
>
> ```
> llvm::Constant *ProduceIntToIntCa
andykaylor wrote:
> > My understanding of the attribute is that it only indicates that strict
> > floating-point semantics are (potentially?) required at the call site.
>
> If strict floating-point semantics are required at this call site, they are
> are required on every relevant call in this
@@ -11610,9 +11610,10 @@ static void DiagnoseBadDeduction(Sema &S, NamedDecl
*Found, Decl *Templated,
bool TakingCandidateAddress) {
TemplateParameter Param = DeductionFailure.getTemplateParameter();
NamedDecl *ParamD;
- (ParamD = Param.dy
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109422
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Oleksandr T.
Date: 2025-01-21T22:49:24+02:00
New Revision: cac67d39362b23466708e464c00ce84abe16bece
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cac67d39362b23466708e464c00ce84abe16bece
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cac67d39362b23466708e464c00ce84abe16bece.diff
a-tarasyuk wrote:
@AaronBallman could you review these changes? thanks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
shafik wrote:
I would like to see some more compelling motivation for an extension here.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
andykaylor wrote:
> Shouldn't there be a pointer-vs-intty difference in the LLVM-IR here?
No, because in this case tryEmitAbstract() is only using the size of the type
that's passed in. After a few visits, it eventually calls this function:
```
llvm::Constant *ProduceIntToIntCast(const Expr *
1 - 100 of 454 matches
Mail list logo
