hdoc wrote:
This is rebased onto the latest rev of the main branch and should be ready to
go. We do not have commit permissions, so @AaronBallman could you please help
merge this in? Thank you :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88367
___
c
https://github.com/hdoc updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88367
>From 5a07a5d133a86b229bdfd42343820f0877735f04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hdoc
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 01:54:18 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] Attach comments to decl even if preproc directives are in
between
---
c
https://github.com/mpark closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97255
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 8598bcb9934dca16ea16d87304e00defc85d986c
01ae6c9aee33d3b2b0a00484bf7c041f6b90e710 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Michael Park (mpark)
Changes
This diff adds an overload of `clangdMain` that makes a `FeatureModuleSet`.
`clangdMain` was initially added in 56ac9d46a7c1 to allow custom builds of
clangd outside of
https://github.com/mpark created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97255
This diff adds an overload of `clangdMain` that makes a `FeatureModuleSet`.
`clangdMain` was initially added in 56ac9d46a7c1 to allow custom builds of
clangd outside of the LLVM repo that link against clangd. Curre
https://github.com/mahesh-attarde updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95904
>From 6d6619f8f7a37906ac45791487a4d63b51a48ad1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahesh-attarde
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:15:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] added regcall strct by reg support
---
clang/lib/Co
weiweichen wrote:
Here is a self contained simple repro test
cpp file:
```
#include "clang/Basic/Diagnostic.h"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticIDs.h"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticOptions.h"
#include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h"
#include "llvm/TargetParser/Host
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -29,6 +30,22 @@ struct LOCKABLE Mutex {};
struct Foo {
struct Mutex *mu_;
+ int a_value GUARDED_BY(mu_);
+
+ struct Bar {
+struct Mutex *other_mu ACQUIRED_AFTER(mu_);
+struct Mutex *third_mu ACQUIRED_BEFORE(other_mu);
+ } bar;
+
+ int* a_ptr PT_GUARDED_BY(bar
@@ -29,6 +30,22 @@ struct LOCKABLE Mutex {};
struct Foo {
struct Mutex *mu_;
+ int a_value GUARDED_BY(mu_);
+
+ struct Bar {
+struct Mutex *other_mu ACQUIRED_AFTER(mu_);
aaronpuchert wrote:
I'm not entirely sure how nested `struct`s work in C, but sh
@@ -764,12 +764,6 @@ doesn't know that munl.mu == mutex. The SCOPED_CAPABILITY
attribute handles
aliasing for MutexLocker, but does so only for that particular pattern.
-ACQUIRED_BEFORE(...) and ACQUIRED_AFTER(...) are currently unimplemented.
--
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97232
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1359,17 +1361,18 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::getMutexIDs(CapExprSet
&Mtxs, AttrType *Attr,
const Expr *Exp, const NamedDecl *D,
const CFGBlock *PredBlock,
@@ -1954,6 +1954,125 @@ struct TestTryLock {
} // end namespace TrylockTest
+// Regression test for trylock attributes with an enumerator success argument.
+// Prior versions of the analysis silently failed to evaluate success arguments
+// that were neither `CXXBoolLiteralEx
@@ -608,15 +606,31 @@ static bool checkTryLockFunAttrCommon(Sema &S, Decl *D,
const ParsedAttr &AL,
if (!AL.checkAtLeastNumArgs(S, 1))
return false;
- if (!isIntOrBool(AL.getArgAsExpr(0))) {
+ // The attribute's first argument defines the success value.
+ const Expr
https://github.com/aaronpuchert edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95290
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/aaronpuchert commented:
Don't want to give the wrong impression, I like the idea of this change a lot.
But I think we need to be clearer about the attribute, the return value, and
the relation between them. The attribute needs to be a constant expression for
sure, and it's p
@@ -756,7 +771,68 @@ void etf_fun_params(int lvar
EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(1)); // \
// Check argument parsing.
-// legal attribute arguments
+int global_int = 0;
+int* etf_fun_with_global_ptr_success() EXCLUSIVE_TRYLOCK_FUNCTION(&global_int,
&mu1); //\
+ // expected-err
https://github.com/izaakschroeder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97231
>From 31dc769c1866a4a0100dde0a3743c215a9a5f5eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Izaak Schroeder
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:33:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [libc]: add missing aarch64 headers
---
libc/confi
aaronpuchert wrote:
Thanks for looping me in and sorry for the late reply!
> However, I'm not certain we implement the analysis in an exception-aware way.
If I remember correctly, the CFG is still without exception-handling edges by
default, and support for those edges is still rudimentary and
@@ -322,24 +306,20 @@ struct hash_state {
}
};
-
-/// A global, fixed seed-override variable.
-///
-/// This variable can be set using the \see llvm::set_fixed_execution_seed
-/// function. See that function for details. Do not, under any circumstances,
-/// set or read this
joker-eph wrote:
The premerge config seems broken because of this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96282
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kovdan01 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97237
Enable the following ptrauth flags when `pauthabi` is passed as branch
protection:
- `intrinsics`;
- `calls`;
- `returns`;
- `auth-traps`;
- `vtable-pointer-address-discrimination`;
- `vtable-pointer-type-discr
mejedi wrote:
@yonghong-song @efriedma-quic Any chance we could get it merged?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/trcrsired updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96417
>From 3a78dfee50e86f10051b681b4a6dee0071b0ca78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: trcrsired
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:07:19 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Support --sysroot= for ${arch}-windows-msvc targets
I think it is
https://github.com/mstorsjo updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97232
From bc68b1bc25f7a04a0ddf2188ae26ed7853913b69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Martin=20Storsj=C3=B6?=
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:50:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Disable C++14 sized deallocation by d
https://github.com/ZijunZhaoCCK closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97129
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 4997af98a008e71a3df61707559710d1c2769839
424eb0ff6b32abcb4eede92c1b2f78a32d3b37a6 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)
Changes
This reverts 130e93cc26ca9d3ac50ec5a92e3109577ca2e702 for the MinGW target.
This avoids the issue that is discussed in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/96899 (and which is summarized in
https://github.com/mstorsjo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97232
This reverts 130e93cc26ca9d3ac50ec5a92e3109577ca2e702 for the MinGW target.
This avoids the issue that is discussed in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/96899 (and which is summarized in
the code comm
https://github.com/izaakschroeder edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/izaakschroeder updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97231
>From 31dc769c1866a4a0100dde0a3743c215a9a5f5eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Izaak Schroeder
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:33:16 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [libc]: add missing aarch64 headers
---
libc/confi
aaronpuchert wrote:
Doesn't this fit better in `Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp`? That's where we're checking
the attributes themselves and whether they make sense on a declaration. This
would seem like a good place to check against previous declarations. Though to
be fair, I don't know how late the lat
https://github.com/izaakschroeder edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97231
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/izaakschroeder created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97231
Companion to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/97191
>From 31dc769c1866a4a0100dde0a3743c215a9a5f5eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Izaak Schroeder
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 13:33:16 -0700
Subject:
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/apivovarov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97179
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
eli-schwartz wrote:
The `-export-dynamic` flag is supported by libtool, not gcc and not binutils
ld. If passed to libtool, it will cause `$export_dynamic_flag_spec` as
conditionally per-platform defined in a GNU autotools configure script to be
evaluated and passed to the compiler:
- for gcc,
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static constexpr fltSemantics semIEEEquad = {16383, -16382,
113, 128};
static constexpr fltSemantics semFloat8E5M2 = {15, -14, 3, 8};
static constexpr fltSemantics semFloat8E5M2FNUZ = {
15, -15, 3, 8, fltNonfiniteBehavior::NanOnly,
fltNanEncoding::Nega
minglotus-6 wrote:
Fixing https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/672 in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97228
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81442
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
>From 0dea95701ca4dfca9b7d0bd889003fc35aa3017e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:39:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] [NFC] [Clang] Some core issues have changed status from
ten
https://github.com/smanna12 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97220
>From 63f45c952ff8ab7df261a150355a34267e4a645c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Manna, Soumi"
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:40:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang] Prevent null pointer dereference in designated
ini
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 2051736f7bc3fb1a8daaeecc854f93604a590aba
44c309e87d2101b554321741b1c751247a5b6478 --
https://github.com/smanna12 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97220
>From 63f45c952ff8ab7df261a150355a34267e4a645c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Manna, Soumi"
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 08:40:27 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Prevent null pointer dereference in designated
ini
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules
Author: None (smanna12)
Changes
This patch addresses a use-after-move issue, reported by static analyzer tool,
by clearing the `PotentiallyInterestingDecls` deque after it has been moved to
`MaybeInterestingDecls`.
The fix ensures that t
https://github.com/smanna12 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97221
This patch addresses a use-after-move issue, reported by static analyzer tool,
by clearing the `PotentiallyInterestingDecls` deque after it has been moved to
`MaybeInterestingDecls`.
The fix ensures that the s
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-sie-win`
running on `sie-win-worker` while building `clang-tools-extra` at step 4
"clean-build-dir".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/46/builds/863
Here is the relevan
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93276
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: PeterChou1
Date: 2024-06-30T08:52:36-07:00
New Revision: a9b1e80acbb3249a245a7bbd8c8f89607bcad954
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a9b1e80acbb3249a245a7bbd8c8f89607bcad954
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a9b1e80acbb3249a245a7bbd8c8f89607bcad954.diff
LO
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
// RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t/docs/GlobalNamespace/Rectangle.html
-check-prefix=HTML-RECTANGLE
// RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t/docs/GlobalNamespace/Circle.html
-check-prefix=HTML-CIRCLE
+// JSON-INDEX: var RootPath = "{{.*}}";
ilove
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: echo "CHECK: var RootPath = \"%/t/docs\";" > %t/check.txt
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
+// RUN: clang-doc --format=html --executor=standalone -p %t %t/test.cpp
--output=%t/docs
ilovepi wrote:
```sug
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: echo "CHECK: var RootPath = \"%/t/docs\";" > %t/check.txt
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
+// RUN: clang-doc --format=html --executor=standalone -p %t %t/test.cpp
--output=%t/docs
+// RUN: FileCheck %t/check.txt -input-
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: echo "CHECK: var RootPath = \"%/t/docs\";" > %t/check.txt
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
ilovepi wrote:
I see you're trying to work around the path inconsistency issues, but that's
just an end-around
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (smanna12)
Changes
This patch adds a null check for the current method declaration before
attempting to determine if it is a designated initializer.
This prevents a potential null pointer dereference when `getCurMethodDecl()`
return
https://github.com/smanna12 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97220
This patch adds a null check for the current method declaration before
attempting to determine if it is a designated initializer.
This prevents a potential null pointer dereference when `getCurMethodDecl()`
re
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
>From a997ae70f86230200b1082c9bdc0bdf56e30b7c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:03:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the order of addInstantiatedParameters in
LambdaScopeForCallOpera
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
+// RUN: clang-doc --doxygen --executor=standalone -p %t %t/test.cpp
-output=../docs
+// RUN: FileCheck %s -input-file=%t/docs/index_json.js
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+
+// CHECK: var RootPath = "{{.*}}.
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: echo "CHECK: var RootPath = \"%t\";" > %t/check.txt
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
+// RUN: clang-doc --doxygen --executor=standalone -p %t %t/test.cpp
-output=%t/docs
+// RUN: FileCheck %t/check.txt -input-file=%t/doc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
+// RUN: echo "CHECK: var RootPath = \"%t\";" > %t/check.txt
+// RUN: cp "%s" "%t/test.cpp"
ilovepi wrote:
what is this doing? `CHECK` lines belong in the test file, generally. If you
need to split them up som
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t
+// RUN: mkdir %t
ilovepi wrote:
nit: Can be one line w/ `&&`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
Author: Youngsuk Kim
Date: 2024-06-30T10:02:49-05:00
New Revision: ac84ada9a169a72ad136ef05c2c194f594f24a37
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac84ada9a169a72ad136ef05c2c194f594f24a37
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ac84ada9a169a72ad136ef05c2c194f594f24a37.diff
LYP951018 wrote:
Sorry for disturbing... I'm trying to get the CI working. I can't figure out
why buildkite/github-pull-requests failed...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:/
https://github.com/LYP951018 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/LYP951018 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
>From a997ae70f86230200b1082c9bdc0bdf56e30b7c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:03:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the order of addInstantiatedParameters in
LambdaScopeForCallOpera
https://github.com/LYP951018 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
>From a997ae70f86230200b1082c9bdc0bdf56e30b7c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: letrec
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 21:03:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the order of addInstantiatedParameters in
LambdaScopeForCallOpera
https://github.com/PBHDK updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220
From 37292995de0c5aa87408586749795a97468d4725 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Wolf
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:16:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/25] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with
at() o
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Yupei Liu (LYP951018)
Changes
Currently, `addInstantiatedParameters` is called from the innermost lambda
outward. However, when the function parameters of an inner lambda depend on the
function parameters of an outer lambda, it can lead t
https://github.com/LYP951018 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97215
Currently, `addInstantiatedParameters` is called from the innermost lambda
outward. However, when the function parameters of an inner lambda depend on the
function parameters of an outer lambda, it can lead to
https://github.com/tschuett edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97118
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/PBHDK updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220
From 37292995de0c5aa87408586749795a97468d4725 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Wolf
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:16:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/24] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with
at() o
https://github.com/PBHDK updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220
From 37292995de0c5aa87408586749795a97468d4725 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Wolf
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:16:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/23] Enforce SL.con.3: Add check to replace operator[] with
at() o
https://github.com/MitalAshok edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct D : N::B {
#endif
} // namespace cwg2857
-namespace cwg2858 { // cwg2858: 19 tentatively ready 2024-04-05
+namespace cwg2858 { // cwg2858: 19 ready 2024-04-05
MitalAshok wrote:
The date of the proposed resolution did not change for
https://github.com/MitalAshok updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
>From 0dea95701ca4dfca9b7d0bd889003fc35aa3017e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:39:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] [NFC] [Clang] Some core issues have changed status from
ten
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97210.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+2)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td (+3)
-
https://github.com/MitalAshok created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97210
None
>From c6ee783243e1888074778e2cb6de05df41cc8333 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:55:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] Warn with -Wpre-c23-compat instead of
-Wpre-c++17
MitalAshok wrote:
CC @AaronBallman
Also the clang-format issues are intentional to fit the style of the
surrounding lines
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/c
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 7d33d4720f85fa2df7c1307bcc185017b6e4dd25
ef0072d1fc9b14f7ee657fa95f44a686b78b525a --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2653.htm
Closes #97202
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97208.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2653.htm
Closes #97202
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97208.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes
https://github.com/MitalAshok created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97208
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2653.htm
Closes #97202
>From ef0072d1fc9b14f7ee657fa95f44a686b78b525a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 12:07:54 +0100
Subje
kongy wrote:
> This is probably caused by some downstream patches in google3?
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/llvm/lib/Target/WebAssembly/WebAssemblyISelLowering.cpp
> does not contain any mentions of `M->getFunction` or `M->getContext`. You
> need to add the missing include t
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ struct A {
} // namespace cwg2858
-namespace cwg2877 { // cwg2877: 19 tentatively ready 2024-05-31
+namespace cwg2877 { // cwg2877: 19 ready 2024-05-31
Endilll wrote:
We should fix the comments as it was done in
https://github.com/cplusp
https://github.com/Endilll requested changes to this pull request.
Thank you for taking care of this!
But I'd like to emphasize that updating statuses of existing DR tests is not
just a menial task, otherwise I wouldn't even bother making the script this
strict about statuses in the first place
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void g() {
#endif
} // namespace cwg2877
-namespace cwg2881 { // cwg2881: 19 tentatively ready 2024-04-19
+namespace cwg2881 { // cwg2881: 19 ready 2024-04-19
Endilll wrote:
Since this was added, wording has changed slightly, and a new ill
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)
Changes
Also classes the "ready" status similarly to "tentatively ready" in
make_cxx_dr_status
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/CXX/
https://github.com/MitalAshok created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97200
Also classes the "ready" status similarly to "tentatively ready" in
make_cxx_dr_status
>From 0dea95701ca4dfca9b7d0bd889003fc35aa3017e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mital Ashok
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 10:39:
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
We can get zero type size (thus div by zero crash) if the region is for a
'void*' pointer.
In this patch, let's just override the void type with a char type to avoid the
crash.
Fixes
htt
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97199
We can get zero type size (thus div by zero crash) if the region is for a
'void*' pointer.
In this patch, let's just override the void type with a char type to avoid the
crash.
Fixes
https://github.com/llvm/ll
kimgr wrote:
cc @llvm-beanz -- you seem to have done a fair bit with the LLVM CMake system.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97197
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
