cor3ntin wrote:
Thanks for the new tests. did you see this comment?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86526#pullrequestreview-1976690810
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86526
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85564
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87953
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
Give @hubert-reinterpretcast a few days to possibly review, otherwise LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87930
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
cor3ntin wrote:
This needs a release note and a test in test/CXX/drs/dr28xx.cpp (and a rerun of
www/make_cxx_dr_status )
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88042
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88085
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -11444,9 +11444,12 @@ static void DiagnoseBadShiftValues(Sema& S, ExprResult
&LHS, ExprResult &RHS,
llvm::APSInt Right = RHSResult.Val.getInt();
if (Right.isNegative()) {
-S.DiagRuntimeBehavior(Loc, RHS.get(),
- S.PDiag(diag::warn_shift_neg
@@ -897,7 +897,20 @@ Instruction *InstCombinerImpl::visitTrunc(TruncInst
&Trunc) {
}
}
- return nullptr;
+ bool Changed = false;
+ if (!Trunc.hasNoSignedWrap() &&
+ ComputeMaxSignificantBits(Src, /*Depth=*/0, &Trunc) <= DestWidth) {
+Trunc.setHasNoSignedWrap
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:55:37+02:00
New Revision: 11ba795565c231a95a7e34bb0e4dff099234c736
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/11ba795565c231a95a7e34bb0e4dff099234c736
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/11ba795565c231a95a7e34bb0e4dff099234c736.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:55:36+02:00
New Revision: acff0b03167f877f783d9386014e1ebc20db1c2f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acff0b03167f877f783d9386014e1ebc20db1c2f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/acff0b03167f877f783d9386014e1ebc20db1c2f.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:55:36+02:00
New Revision: 5d1f779540517f47abb4927f4ded51cac94fd366
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d1f779540517f47abb4927f4ded51cac94fd366
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5d1f779540517f47abb4927f4ded51cac94fd366.diff
LO
Sirraide wrote:
I’ve also added a parser test for that as well just now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86526
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Sirraide wrote:
> I wanted to make you aware of this new core issue
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2876.html (which i think we should
> have tests for). Thanks
So, as of now, this
```c++
using T = void ();
using U = int;
T a = delete ("hello");
U b = delete ("hello"), c, d = delete
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-04-09T08:51:36+03:00
New Revision: c7db450e5c1a83ea768765dcdedfd50f3358d418
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7db450e5c1a83ea768765dcdedfd50f3358d418
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7db450e5c1a83ea768765dcdedfd50f3358d418.
https://github.com/orcguru deleted
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84132
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -3369,6 +3369,59 @@ SDValue
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddressAIX(SDValue Op,
bool Is64Bit = Subtarget.isPPC64();
bool HasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS = Subtarget.hasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS();
TLSModel::Model Model = getTargetMachine().getTLSModel(GV);
+ // Initialize TLS
@@ -3369,6 +3369,59 @@ SDValue
PPCTargetLowering::LowerGlobalTLSAddressAIX(SDValue Op,
bool Is64Bit = Subtarget.isPPC64();
bool HasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS = Subtarget.hasAIXSmallLocalExecTLS();
TLSModel::Model Model = getTargetMachine().getTLSModel(GV);
+ // Initialize TLS
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2024-04-09T07:04:35+02:00
New Revision: d4120477130a5f9e472753068dcc627baddc44f6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4120477130a5f9e472753068dcc627baddc44f6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d4120477130a5f9e472753068dcc627baddc44f6.diff
LO
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2024-04-09T05:03:34Z
New Revision: 62e92573d28d62ab7e6438ac34d513b07c51ce09
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62e92573d28d62ab7e6438ac34d513b07c51ce09
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/62e92573d28d62ab7e6438ac34d513b07c51ce09.diff
LO
https://github.com/danix800 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88014
>From fbd0780923d40b0d8290280731239a722a7af7a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dingfei
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 00:26:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AST][RecoveryExpr] Fix a crash on c89/c90 invalid
InitListExpr (#
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-04-08T21:20:18-07:00
New Revision: 5c056b32350e834924356b1af78504d261d24e42
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c056b32350e834924356b1af78504d261d24e42
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5c056b32350e834924356b1af78504d261d24e42.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/vgvassilev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87281
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vassil Vassilev
Date: 2024-04-09T07:14:43+03:00
New Revision: a30662fc2acdd73ca1a9217716299a4676999fb4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a30662fc2acdd73ca1a9217716299a4676999fb4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a30662fc2acdd73ca1a9217716299a4676999fb4.dif
danix800 wrote:
> LGTM but please add a release note so users know about the bug fix.
Release note added.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76619
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
https://github.com/danix800 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76619
>From 0ca1a2b2573d1f89a1b4d13cd43628a46c1e5c98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: dingfei
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 00:32:01 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [ASTMatchers] fix captureVars assertion failure on
capturesVariables
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This patch moves SYCL-related `Sema` functions into new `SemaSYCL` class,
following the recent example of OpenACC and HLSL. This is a part of the effort
to split `Sema`. Additional context can be found
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88086
This patch moves SYCL-related `Sema` functions into new `SemaSYCL` class,
following the recent example of OpenACC and HLSL. This is a part of the effort
to split `Sema`. Additional context can be found in #82217
jhuber6 wrote:
> So the error is caused by your `c++` not supporting `__has_feature`
> presumably. However I have no clue why that would happen due to this patch. I
> believe in a few days @jdoerfert will flip the switch and we won't even allow
> `libomptarget` to be built without using the ru
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Owen Pan (owenca)
Changes
Fixes #87907.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88085.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp (+2-1)
- (modified) clang/unittests/Format/TokenAnnot
https://github.com/owenca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88085
Fixes #87907.
>From 0daef6caaac5d3779cda0d4cbbf9cd2514662b92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 20:29:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] instanceof is a keyword only in
Java/Java
jhuber6 wrote:
> Hey, @jhuber. This change broke the flang build.
>
> When I revert the change, everything builds cleanly. So I reverted it in
> merge request #88083.
>
> After this change was added, I started getting messages like:
>
> ```
> [4/205] Building CXX object
> projects/openmp/lib
https://github.com/psteinfeld closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88083
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Pete Steinfeld
Date: 2024-04-08T20:20:27-07:00
New Revision: 25e3d2b0fc1e2b4df19d7f18fbdd04c154e1d0e8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25e3d2b0fc1e2b4df19d7f18fbdd04c154e1d0e8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/25e3d2b0fc1e2b4df19d7f18fbdd04c154e1d0e8.diff
jhuber6 wrote:
> Hey, @jhuber. This change broke the flang build.
>
> When I revert the change, everything builds cleanly. So I reverted it in
> merge request #88083.
>
> After this change was added, I started getting messages like:
>
> ```
> [4/205] Building CXX object
> projects/openmp/lib
https://github.com/haonanya edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
psteinfeld wrote:
Hey, @jhuber. This change broke the flang build.
When I revert the change, everything builds cleanly. So I reverted it in merge
request
After this change was added, I started getting messages like:
```
[4/205] Building CXX object
projects/openmp/libomptarget/plugins-nex
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pete Steinfeld (psteinfeld)
Changes
…irectory (#88007)"
This reverts commit 8671429151d5e67d3f21a737809953ae8bdfbfde.
This commit broke the flang build, so I'm reverting it. See the comments in
merge request #88007 for more information.
https://github.com/haonanya edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/psteinfeld created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88083
…irectory (#88007)"
This reverts commit 8671429151d5e67d3f21a737809953ae8bdfbfde.
This commit broke the flang build, so I'm reverting it. See the comments in
merge request #88007 for more information.
>Fro
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+// RUN: %clang -x c++ -fsanitize=implicit-bitfield-conversion -target
x86_64-linux -S -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
--check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-BITFIELD-CONVERSION
+// RUN: %clang -x c++ -fsanitize=implicit-integer-conversion -target
x86_64-linux -S -emit
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From c94d444b4317706c7434853c0c3490826bdbc110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
Summar
https://github.com/CRobeck updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076
>From 1e2cab61cbf46e5cc73d7ee6523dcce1a75c7549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corbin Robeck
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:58:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] add clang builtins for amdgcn s_ttrace intrinsics
---
clang/
@@ -268,17 +268,34 @@ class alignas(8) Decl {
/// }
/// void A::f(); // SemanticDC == namespace 'A'
///// LexicalDC == global namespace
- llvm::PointerUnion DeclCtx;
+ llvm::PointerIntPair<
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
+1 for more comments. I
zyn0217 wrote:
@jcsxky At the glance of the stacktrace, I suspect we probably need some
mechanism of deferral codegen while instantiating the enclosing struct. Can you
please file a separate issue?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82310
___
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From 198e77ad14ff83d2ed9ea80a1dcecafa1b1336a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
Summar
https://github.com/zyn0217 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Younan Zhang
Date: 2024-04-09T09:53:58+08:00
New Revision: f7d93373969b2b757f5d5ef5e157dabe3bb9b0ae
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7d93373969b2b757f5d5ef5e157dabe3bb9b0ae
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f7d93373969b2b757f5d5ef5e157dabe3bb9b0ae.diff
jhuber6 wrote:
> How about `llvm.offload`? This might need broader discussion but I'm fine
> either way.
I don't think it's too important here since these are effectively internal
variables. However in the future I want to combine `cuda_offload_entires` and
friends into just `llvm_offload_ent
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From 24c3253093491d0fbe297bc10cba8552b7bef665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
Summar
CRobeck wrote:
Probably want to add a test in:
clang/test/CodeGenOpenCL/builtins-amdgcn-gfx12.cl
as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
shiltian wrote:
How about `llvm.offload`? This might need broader discussion but I'm fine
either way.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
jcsxky wrote:
> > Still crash on
> > ```c++
> > template constexpr auto x = F();
> > template constexpr int a() { return 1; }
> >
> > template
> > struct A {
> > using Func = decltype(
> > [](T) {
> > return x<[] constexpr { return a(); }>;
> > // return x<[] constexpr {
https://github.com/jrtc27 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85786
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64-linux-gnu -target-feature +i -S
-emit-llvm -o - %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-UNSUPPORT-EXT
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-feature +i -S -emit-llvm -o -
%s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=
@@ -14156,6 +14157,84 @@
CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64CpuSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
return Result;
}
+llvm::SmallVector
+CodeGenFunction::EmitRISCVExtSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
+ auto BaseExtReqs = llvm::RISCV::getBaseExtensionKey(FeaturesStrs);
+ auto IMACom
@@ -14156,6 +14157,84 @@
CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64CpuSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
return Result;
}
+llvm::SmallVector
+CodeGenFunction::EmitRISCVExtSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
+ auto BaseExtReqs = llvm::RISCV::getBaseExtensionKey(FeaturesStrs);
+ auto IMACom
@@ -14156,6 +14157,84 @@
CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64CpuSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
return Result;
}
+llvm::SmallVector
+CodeGenFunction::EmitRISCVExtSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
+ auto BaseExtReqs = llvm::RISCV::getBaseExtensionKey(FeaturesStrs);
+ auto IMACom
@@ -14156,6 +14157,84 @@
CodeGenFunction::EmitAArch64CpuSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
return Result;
}
+llvm::SmallVector
+CodeGenFunction::EmitRISCVExtSupports(ArrayRef FeaturesStrs) {
+ auto BaseExtReqs = llvm::RISCV::getBaseExtensionKey(FeaturesStrs);
+ auto IMACom
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Corbin Robeck (CRobeck)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Basic/BuiltinsAMDGPU.def (+2)
- (modified) llvm/include/llvm/IR/IntrinsicsAMDGPU.td
https://github.com/CRobeck edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/CRobeck created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88076
None
>From 1e2cab61cbf46e5cc73d7ee6523dcce1a75c7549 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corbin Robeck
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:58:57 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] add clang builtins for amdgcn s_ttrace intrinsics
---
clan
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64-linux-gnu -target-feature +i -S
-emit-llvm -o - %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-UNSUPPORT-EXT
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-feature +i -S -emit-llvm -o -
%s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64-linux-gnu -target-feature +i -S
-emit-llvm -o - %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-UNSUPPORT-EXT
+// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-feature +i -S -emit-llvm -o -
%s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=
https://github.com/jhuber6 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
>From e236a4351c198f261e544970d4355f749db11fd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joseph Huber
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 19:10:37 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Offload][NFC] Remove `omp_` prefix from offloading entries
Summar
bolshakov-a wrote:
@erichkeane, @cor3ntin, @Endilll, @efriedma-quic ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85837
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jwanggit86 wrote:
Added a testcase that has flat_atomic_swap, which is an atomic without return.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 1950ebd17bbf1f2ad2a3799cd5966412ccfee9c4
651ebdc8b9875bc336aed345d61df8a9395fd6d7 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Joseph Huber (jhuber6)
Changes
Summary:
These entires are generic for offloading with the new driver now. Having
the `omp` prefix was a historical artifact and is confusing when used
for CUDA. This patch just renames them for now, future pa
https://github.com/jhuber6 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88071
Summary:
These entires are generic for offloading with the new driver now. Having
the `omp` prefix was a historical artifact and is confusing when used
for CUDA. This patch just renames them for now, future patche
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-04-08T16:51:34-07:00
New Revision: ccdebbae4d77d3efc236af92c22941de5d437e01
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccdebbae4d77d3efc236af92c22941de5d437e01
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ccdebbae4d77d3efc236af92c22941de5d437e01.diff
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87866
>From 2847b8be2e4938c03aea57609842e2fee776d916 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 21:51:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20initia?=
=?UTF-
https://github.com/MaskRay edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83774
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7238,10 +7238,15 @@ void Clang::ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const
JobAction &JA,
Args.addOptInFlag(CmdArgs, options::OPT_frelaxed_template_template_args,
options::OPT_fno_relaxed_template_template_args);
- // -fsized-deallocation is off by default,
https://github.com/aeubanks edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
aeubanks wrote:
> I'd suggest adding bitcode upgrade if it isn't too hard (I don't think it
> should be?)
done
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/aeubanks updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87906
>From 7a9df42b4c4f4f1b02dc3158d24800f3d4b68d8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arthur Eubanks
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 05:29:36 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][llvm] Remove "implicit-section-name" attribute
D334
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84651
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Max Winkler
Date: 2024-04-08T15:24:08-07:00
New Revision: f94bbfed7cf08f60e20756dce8965d2c6ed70ea1
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f94bbfed7cf08f60e20756dce8965d2c6ed70ea1
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f94bbfed7cf08f60e20756dce8965d2c6ed70ea1.diff
L
https://github.com/efriedma-quic approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84651
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
Given there isn't any target-independent way to construct such a type, it feels
sort of redundant. (A user could easily implement this themselves.) But I
can't think of a reason to avoid adding this.
Please update documentation and add a release note.
https://github.com
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88019
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Eli Friedman
Date: 2024-04-08T15:16:00-07:00
New Revision: 7ad481e76c9bee5b9895ebfa0fdb52f31cb7de77
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7ad481e76c9bee5b9895ebfa0fdb52f31cb7de77
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7ad481e76c9bee5b9895ebfa0fdb52f31cb7de77.diff
vitalybuka wrote:
ok
please paste here what ever looks like real failure from the patch
buildbot does not sent me, as I am not on the blame list
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87761
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
efriedma-quic wrote:
I'd suggest adding bitcode upgrade if it isn't too hard (I don't think it
should be?)
Otherwise looks fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87906
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87717
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Eli Friedman
Date: 2024-04-08T15:03:34-07:00
New Revision: 1950ebd17bbf1f2ad2a3799cd5966412ccfee9c4
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1950ebd17bbf1f2ad2a3799cd5966412ccfee9c4
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1950ebd17bbf1f2ad2a3799cd5966412ccfee9c4.diff
https://github.com/SimplyDanny closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87832
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Danny Mösch
Date: 2024-04-08T23:54:29+02:00
New Revision: 16b3e43a030b0322e0d81debba3d63f145c8fd0b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16b3e43a030b0322e0d81debba3d63f145c8fd0b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/16b3e43a030b0322e0d81debba3d63f145c8fd0b.diff
L
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84050
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
I'm OK with this, but would like @cor3ntin to take another look since he
engaged earlier.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87541
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman
https://github.com/urnathan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73263
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date: 2024-04-08T17:32:13-04:00
New Revision: 50a6738636d1b1dda0c5887cf0623ee084854272
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50a6738636d1b1dda0c5887cf0623ee084854272
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/50a6738636d1b1dda0c5887cf0623ee084854272.diff
https://github.com/erichkeane updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87998
>From 477ca3032a26467dfb67ef5d2f9b54bb2f958a33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erichkeane
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 07:28:50 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update __cpp_concepts macro
After discussion with a few other
Zonotora wrote:
@vitalybuka Well, this is awkward, fails due to:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/127/builds/64260
C:\b\slave\sanitizer-windows\llvm-project\compiler-rt\test\ubsan\TestCases\ImplicitConversion\bitfield-conversion.c:36:3:
error: unknown type name '_Bool'
Some other test
sdkrystian wrote:
Ping @erichkeane :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87541
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
This seems right to me, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88042
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
https://github.com/sdkrystian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88042
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian)
Changes
The approved resolution for
[CWG2858](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2858.html) changes
[[expr.prim.id.qual] p2 sentence
2](https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.id.qual#2) to read:
> A declar
1 - 100 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
