ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@mordante if we want this for 18, we need to land and backport it in this week.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82160
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
kpdev wrote:
@AaronBallman @kongy Hi! Could you please take a look at this patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78253
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
minglotus-6 wrote:
New changes since last review besides clang-formats
1. Merged profile format change from main branch.
2. In instrumentation pass, emit unsupported warnings for non-ELF object file
formats.
- Updated vtable_profile.ll and add vtable_prof_unsupported.ll as test
cases.
htt
https://github.com/minglotus-6 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mahtohappy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83124
>From 7f6bbd2a9e5ab162b0efb5c6dcca91e1d83a0bce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mahtohappy
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 03:13:51 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Clang][Sema] placement new initializes typedef array with
corre
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82291
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-02-27T22:25:55-08:00
New Revision: 4d04a40adb68f284350831911a658715134c66d8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d04a40adb68f284350831911a658715134c66d8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4d04a40adb68f284350831911a658715134c66d8.diff
arsenm wrote:
> So overall, the practical effect of the `denormal-fp-math` attribute being
> set incorrectly doesn't appear to matter.
It matters more for AMDGPU, where we need to care because some instructions
just don't respect denormals. We legalize some operations differently depending
on
https://github.com/minglotus-6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/arsenm commented:
Title should be rephrased; this doesn't have anything to do with inlining
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81058
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm
t-tye wrote:
I am not clear why new functions need to be added for this, as I think there
are existing functions that already do this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82552
>From a7d0c1cf15764ee2ccbeb609fbaf014fdbde81b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:56:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [InstallAPI] Hookup Input files & basic ASTVisitor
This patch
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sandeep Kosuri (sandeepkosuri)
Changes
- adds Parse and Sema support for the `declare target` directive inside a
function scope.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83223.diff
5 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/i
https://github.com/sandeepkosuri created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83223
- adds Parse and Sema support for the `declare target` directive inside a
function scope.
>From cbf1b4409e379309ae3d942b3dbec0964b9ee0d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sandeep Kosuri
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 202
mahtohappy wrote:
@shafik I'm not aware of which cases it was catching before, I was hoping
testing will reveal those testcases. I agree with your thinking that we might
be breaking something and and don't have test coverage for it. I'll leave this
condition as it is and add a separate check f
shafik wrote:
Can you explain which cases the `if (!ArraySize)` condition was catching before
and why the change does not effect those cases? My fear is that we are breaking
other cases but we don't have test coverage for those cases and we are missing
those breaks.
https://github.com/llvm/ll
https://github.com/wsmoses reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wsmoses wrote:
Hm actually reopening, for some reason the metadata isn't being pushed at O0.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com
dwblaikie wrote:
Some test coverage would be good to help demonstrate the issue/fix
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83175
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/torshepherd updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79867
>From 94dee94becb7d79b087e183754602e08a5c4669d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tor Shepherd
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:44:25 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [clangd] Add fix-all CodeActions
---
clang-tools-extra/clang
haoNoQ wrote:
Yes I like this perspective: "Schrödinger's need-for-pre-commit-approval" isn't
a great way to communicate 😅 I'll be more clear in the future.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists
haoNoQ wrote:
Hi! I wonder if path-sensitive analysis is useful here at all. If you simply
warn every time you see arithmetic performed on a pointer to a class with at
least one virtual method, wouldn't that be quite accurate most of the time?
At a glance, such operation only makes sense when
topperc wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> Will it be in LLVM 18? Or we need more time to examine its robustness?
The bar for LLVM 18 is pretty high at this point. I doubt this qualifies.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
c
https://github.com/wangpc-pp approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Will it be in LLVM 18? Or we need more time to examine its robustness?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83195
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown --relocation-model=pic
-enable-tlsdesc | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-pc-linu
@@ -18515,17 +18515,17 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerGlobalAddress(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return LowerGlobalOrExternal(Op, DAG, /*ForCall=*/false);
}
-static SDValue
-GetTLSADDR(SelectionDAG &DAG, SDValue Chain, GlobalAddressSDNode *GA,
- SDValue *InG
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-unknown-unknown --relocation-model=pic
-enable-tlsdesc | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=X86
MaskRay wrote:
`-unkno
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82552
>From b0cc1eeba893c24d5358cb49189da2e287daf972 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:56:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [InstallAPI] Hookup Input files & basic ASTVisitor
This p
https://github.com/brad0 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83216
>From 4409a37ff160edb3c41c7650c181a5c9a60c397b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:07:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver][RISCV] Forward --no-relax option to linker for
RISC-V on *BSD
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff bfcf7a0707592ccc7fd9e805aeb36c4da3f315a6
e9dca00cb002d223b4148d648f4f31b4cfc31d63 --
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Brad Smith (brad0)
Changes
…D and Haiku
Based on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76432
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83216.diff
4 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Free
https://github.com/brad0 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83216
…D and Haiku
Based on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76432
>From e9dca00cb002d223b4148d648f4f31b4cfc31d63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brad Smith
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 21:07:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH]
@@ -2392,14 +2392,88 @@ TEST(TransferTest, InitListExprAsUnion) {
} F;
public:
- constexpr target() : F{nullptr} {}
+ constexpr target() : F{nullptr} {
+int *null = nullptr;
+F.b; // Make sure we reference 'b' so it is modeled.
+//
@@ -2392,14 +2392,88 @@ TEST(TransferTest, InitListExprAsUnion) {
} F;
public:
- constexpr target() : F{nullptr} {}
+ constexpr target() : F{nullptr} {
+int *null = nullptr;
+F.b; // Make sure we reference 'b' so it is modeled.
+//
https://github.com/ymand edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82986
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82986
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1306,15 +1306,73 @@ float min(float __x, float __y) { return
__builtin_fminf(__x, __y); }
__DEVICE__
double min(double __x, double __y) { return __builtin_fmin(__x, __y); }
-#if !defined(__HIPCC_RTC__) && !defined(__OPENMP_AMDGCN__)
-__host__ inline static int min(int __a
https://github.com/dhoekwater closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82662
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Daniel Hoekwater
Date: 2024-02-27T17:34:48-08:00
New Revision: e9e7aeadaf0ce9d66ff352856fd2d1005b0f7d74
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e9e7aeadaf0ce9d66ff352856fd2d1005b0f7d74
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e9e7aeadaf0ce9d66ff352856fd2d1005b0f7d74.di
nathanchance wrote:
For what it's worth, this change adds several instances of
`-Wenum-enum-conversion` for the Linux kernel:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/2002. I assume this is
intentional given the nature of the change as a whole but neither the tests nor
the release note
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82552
>From b0cc1eeba893c24d5358cb49189da2e287daf972 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:56:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [InstallAPI] Hookup Input files & basic ASTVisitor
This p
https://github.com/ayermolo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ayermolo closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Alexander Yermolovich
Date: 2024-02-27T17:26:06-08:00
New Revision: dba2dd2c487d7bed7ad3b76a67fdfce464f0edbf
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dba2dd2c487d7bed7ad3b76a67fdfce464f0edbf
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/dba2dd2c487d7bed7ad3b76a67fdfce464f0ed
Author: Yaxun (Sam) Liu
Date: 2024-02-27T20:19:07-05:00
New Revision: bcbce807d76a30388b366d14051c5f80e9724dab
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bcbce807d76a30388b366d14051c5f80e9724dab
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bcbce807d76a30388b366d14051c5f80e9724dab.dif
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83214
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
wsmoses wrote:
Okay, the AnnotateAttr doesn't create LLVM string attributes, it creates LLVM
metadata, but that should sufice, closing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lis
https://github.com/wsmoses closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83059
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
⚠️ We detected that you are using a GitHub private e-mail address to contribute
to the repo.
Please turn off [Keep my email addresses
private](https://github.com/settings/emails) setting in your account.
See [LLVM
Discourse](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/hidden-em
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Alexander Yermolovich (ayermolo)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#82840
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83214.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp (+3-4)
- (modified
ayermolo wrote:
revert https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83214
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ayermolo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83214
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#82840
>From 58007120dfbc69ccfdf04ae1eb71b30e3582b435 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Yermolovich <43973793+ayerm...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 16:40:45 -0
ayermolo wrote:
> I don't know if this is correct.
>
> Maybe just add a triple to the problematic clang invocation for now and have
> this reviewed by a local expert while trunk isn't broken?
ok
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
___
cf
@@ -628,9 +628,8 @@ void CGDebugInfo::CreateCompileUnit() {
// file was specified with an absolute path.
if (CSKind)
CSInfo.emplace(*CSKind, Checksum);
- llvm::DIFile *CUFile = DBuilder.createFile(
- remapDIPath(MainFileName), remapDIPath(getCurrentDirname()), CSI
https://github.com/adrian-prantl commented:
Can you add a test for this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83175
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
nico wrote:
I don't know if this is correct.
Maybe just add a triple to the problematic clang invocation for now and have
this reviewed by a local expert while trunk isn't broken?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
___
cfe-commits mailin
https://github.com/bwendling edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83204
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ayermolo wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ayermolo wrote:
Test passes on mac
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Alexander Yermolovich (ayermolo)
Changes
This is a fix for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82840. On mac
tunning is by default LLDB. If the flag was passed in to clang after that PR it
would not have been passed in by the driver.
https://github.com/ayermolo created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83206
This is a fix for https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82840. On mac
tunning is by default LLDB. If the flag was passed in to clang after that PR it
would not have been passed in by the driver.
>From c7fb9
ayermolo wrote:
> It's been a few hours. Time to revert and analyze offline?
I think I have a fix. Just takes forever to setup and build on my laptop to
test it.
Basically I think mac defaults to LLDB tuning, and test that fails explicitly
passes the flag in.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
nico wrote:
It's been a few hours. Time to revert and analyze offline?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bwendling wrote:
The first PR attempt was here: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78526
It was NACK'ed because it used the LLVM IR representation of the structure,
which wasn't appropriate. To solve that issue, I chose to expand the
`llvm.objectsize()` builtin to contain the size and o
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Bill Wendling (bwendling)
Changes
The second argument of __builtin_dynamic_object_size controls whether it
returns the size of the whole object or the closest surrounding object.
For this struct:
stru
@@ -1201,19 +1197,22 @@ void CodeGenPGO::emitMCDCCondBitmapUpdate(CGBuilderTy
&Builder, const Expr *S,
// Extract the ID of the condition we are setting in the bitmap.
const auto &Branch = BranchStateIter->second;
assert(Branch.ID >= 0 && "Condition has no ID!");
+ asse
@@ -983,7 +979,7 @@ void CodeGenPGO::mapRegionCounters(const Decl *D) {
// for most embedded applications. Setting a maximum value prevents the
// bitmap footprint from growing too large without the user's knowledge. In
// the future, this value could be adjusted with a c
@@ -1282,8 +1283,14 @@ class SegmentBuilder {
// value for that area.
// We add counts of the regions of the same kind as the active region
// to handle the both situations.
- if (I->Kind == Active->Kind)
-Active->ExecutionCount += I->ExecutionCou
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82291
>From 0a8cfb11a601e7a6ec59489b8ac15c40136002b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:12:16 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker] Allow a variable
declaration
https://github.com/gulfemsavrun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75425
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
rniwa wrote:
Thanks for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82291
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
LGTM, looks straightforward!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82291
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/farzonl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83077
>From d4384c5ac52596eeab512574111e499f230b7db7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Farzon Lotfi
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 20:08:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [HLSL] Implementation lerp intrinsic This is the start of
implem
@@ -1503,38 +1527,53 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
}
// Create Branch Region around condition.
-createBranchRegion(S->getCond(), BodyCount,
- subtractCounters(CondCount, BodyCount));
+if (!llvm::EnableSingleByteCoverage)
+ c
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
Author: Craig Topper (topperc)
Changes
Document that we don't use the double compare and swap instructions due to ABI
concerns.
---
Patch is 21.20 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
https://github.com/topperc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83195
Document that we don't use the double compare and swap instructions due to ABI
concerns.
>From 8ed68475b43008d9c7baff7f275026cc7ada5993 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Topper
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:01:5
https://github.com/farzonl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83077
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2258,6 +2258,94 @@ class ExtractTypeForDeductionGuide
}
};
+// Build a deduction guide with the specified parameter types.
+FunctionTemplateDecl *
+buildDeductionGuide(Sema &SemaRef, TemplateDecl *OriginalTemplate,
+TemplateParameterList *TemplatePara
@@ -10598,10 +10598,36 @@ QualType
Sema::DeduceTemplateSpecializationFromInitializer(
if (TemplateName.isDependent())
return SubstAutoTypeDependent(TSInfo->getType());
- // We can only perform deduction for class templates.
+ // We can only perform deduction for class
@@ -10598,10 +10598,36 @@ QualType
Sema::DeduceTemplateSpecializationFromInitializer(
if (TemplateName.isDependent())
return SubstAutoTypeDependent(TSInfo->getType());
- // We can only perform deduction for class templates.
+ // We can only perform deduction for class
@@ -1036,7 +1041,8 @@ void EmitAssemblyHelper::RunOptimizationPipeline(
if (!actionRequiresCodeGen(Action) && CodeGenOpts.VerifyModule)
MPM.addPass(VerifierPass());
- if (Action == Backend_EmitBC || Action == Backend_EmitLL) {
+ if (Action == Backend_EmitBC || Action =
https://github.com/erichkeane commented:
No additional comments from me, if the other reviewers are happy, I'm happy
with where this is/is going.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78000
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
h
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82552
>From b0cc1eeba893c24d5358cb49189da2e287daf972 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:56:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [InstallAPI] Hookup Input files & basic ASTVisitor
This patch
https://github.com/EthanLuisMcDonough updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76587
>From 530eb982b9770190377bb0bd09c5cb715f34d484 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ethan Luis McDonough
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 20:38:38 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] Add profiling functions to libomptarget
wdunicornpro wrote:
@zygoloid Sorry about the abrupt ping but I figured you might have the best
knowledge about that part of code. Do you have any thoughts on this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81950
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commi
https://github.com/Sirraide edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/wdunicornpro edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81950
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dhoekwater updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82662
>From 11c8f1f843de68c35e8e33f992765df1bbcdbfb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Hoekwater
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:39:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver] Allow -fbasic-block-address-map for AArch64 ELF
E
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64 -fbasic-block-address-map %s -S 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PRESENT %s
+// RUN: %clang -### -target aarch64 -fbasic-block-address-map %s -S 2>&1 |
FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-PRESENT %s
dhoekwater wr
ayermolo wrote:
> Looks this breaks tests on macOS: http://45.33.8.238/macm1/79435/step_7.txt
>
> Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
> Looks this breaks tests on macOS: http://45.33.8.238/macm1/79435/step_7.txt
>
> Please take a look and revert for now if it ta
Sirraide wrote:
CC @shafik, @AaronBallman
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83187
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Sirraide)
Changes
When resolving the type of `this` inside a member function, we were attaching
all qualifiers present on the member function to the class type and then making
it a pointer; however, `__restrict`, unlike `const` and
https://github.com/Sirraide created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83187
When resolving the type of `this` inside a member function, we were attaching
all qualifiers present on the member function to the class type and then making
it a pointer; however, `__restrict`, unlike `const`
oskarwirga wrote:
> @oskarwirga I'd like to use this feature but without counter, preserving
> ubsan IDs
>
> Also I think in the current the counter has limited use: in optimized code,
> after inlining, it will have a lot of same ids, like 0, 1 from different
> functions.
>
> So I propose to
vitalybuka wrote:
oskarwirga@ I'd like to use this feature but without counter, preserving ubsan
IDs
Also I think in the current the counter has limited use: in optimized code,
after inlining, it will have a lot of same ids, like 0, 1 from different
functions.
So I propose to undo that part
nico wrote:
Looks this breaks tests on macOS: http://45.33.8.238/macm1/79435/step_7.txt
Please take a look and revert for now if it takes a while to fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82840
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.ll
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@rohit-rao Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a buil
https://github.com/speednoisemovement closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82833
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: rohit-rao
Date: 2024-02-27T15:23:00-05:00
New Revision: e5ed7b6e2fd368b722b6359556cd0125881e7638
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5ed7b6e2fd368b722b6359556cd0125881e7638
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5ed7b6e2fd368b722b6359556cd0125881e7638.diff
LOG
https://github.com/minglotus-6 converted_to_draft
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66825
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
