cor3ntin wrote:
@Rajveer100 you need us to merge that for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-02-21T08:46:47+01:00
New Revision: 351e4fa2bfe5b13073c1675a1b1693ea766c1e25
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/351e4fa2bfe5b13073c1675a1b1693ea766c1e25
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/351e4fa2bfe5b13073c1675a1b1693ea766c1e25.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82234
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Pierre-vh wrote:
> Thanks for the comments @arsenm @yxsamliu @b-sumner.
>
> By approaching a similar solution, do you mean MMRAs (#78569) ?
>
> If so, should I rebase/adapt my patch to the MMRA PR? Or will this PR be
> redundant and needs closing?
>
> @yxsamliu These concise names look good t
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82234
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ def FeatureCuMode : SubtargetFeature<"cumode",
"Enable CU wavefront execution mode"
>;
+def FeaturePreciseMemory
Pierre-vh wrote:
Just remove `m_amdgpu_Features_Group` from your option's `SimpleMFlag`, follow
the same pattern as `wavef
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM, thanks for submitting a fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82251
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hanickadot wrote:
> @hanickadot Your comments to `llvm/CoverageMapping.cpp` are not for this PR.
> See #80676 .
>
> They are my preferences.
Didn't know the context, I saw it green as added. Just ignore it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
__
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-02-20T23:02:03-08:00
New Revision: 8b23d68a621f16b6d66e68cb64b99f1221b9df2c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8b23d68a621f16b6d66e68cb64b99f1221b9df2c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8b23d68a621f16b6d66e68cb64b99f1221b9df2c.diff
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
chapuni wrote:
@hanickadot Your comments to `llvm/CoverageMapping.cpp` are not for this PR.
See #80676 .
They are my preferences.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.ll
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Wentao Zhang (whentojump)
Changes
Currently, upon seeing [unsupported
decisions](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SourceBasedCodeCoverage.html#mc-dc-instrumentation)
(more than 6 conditions, or split nesting), the post-visitor hook
`dataTrave
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Wentao Zhang (whentojump)
Changes
Currently, upon seeing [unsupported
decisions](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SourceBasedCodeCoverage.html#mc-dc-instrumentation)
(more than 6 conditions, or split nesting), the post-visitor hook
`d
https://github.com/whentojump created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82464
Currently, upon seeing [unsupported
decisions](https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SourceBasedCodeCoverage.html#mc-dc-instrumentation)
(more than 6 conditions, or split nesting), the post-visitor hook
`dataTraverseS
@@ -1959,9 +2013,44 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
subtractCounters(ParentCount, TrueCount));
}
+ void RewindDecision(unsigned Since) {
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+llvm::DenseSet SeenIDs;
+#endif
+unsigned NConds = 0;
chapuni wr
@@ -723,7 +737,15 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
if (I == CondIDs.end())
return -1;
else
- return I->second;
+ return I->second.ID;
+ }
+
+ void ccc(const Expr *CondExpr, mcdc::ConditionIDs IDs) {
chapuni wrote:
This is w-i-p. Thanks
https://github.com/chapuni commented:
Thanks for your comments and sorry for my hasty w-i-p work . I know a few rough
implementations would be there.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2471,6 +2480,23 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool
+checkUnionConstructorIntializer(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
+const CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor,
@@ -2343,17 +2349,9 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
// - if the class is a union having variant members, exactly one of them
// shall be initialized;
shafik wrote:
We need add a reference to [cwg2424]
@@ -2471,6 +2480,23 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool
+checkUnionConstructorIntializer(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
+const CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor,
@@ -2471,6 +2480,23 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
return true;
}
+static bool
+checkUnionConstructorIntializer(Sema &SemaRef, const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
shafik wrote:
I really don't like this name, I don't
@@ -2393,6 +2391,17 @@ static bool CheckConstexprFunctionBody(Sema &SemaRef,
const FunctionDecl *Dcl,
Kind))
return false;
}
+} else if (!Constructor->isDelegatingConstructor()) {
shafik wrote:
@@ -223,9 +223,130 @@ Expected CounterMappingContext::evaluate(const
Counter &C) const {
return LastPoppedValue;
}
+mcdc::TVIdxBuilder::TVIdxBuilder(const SmallVectorImpl &NextIDs,
+ int Offset)
+: Indices(NextIDs.size()) {
+ // Construc
@@ -223,9 +223,130 @@ Expected CounterMappingContext::evaluate(const
Counter &C) const {
return LastPoppedValue;
}
+mcdc::TVIdxBuilder::TVIdxBuilder(const SmallVectorImpl &NextIDs,
+ int Offset)
+: Indices(NextIDs.size()) {
+ // Construc
@@ -1959,9 +2013,44 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
subtractCounters(ParentCount, TrueCount));
}
+ void RewindDecision(unsigned Since) {
+#ifndef NDEBUG
+llvm::DenseSet SeenIDs;
+#endif
+unsigned NConds = 0;
hanickadot
@@ -223,9 +223,130 @@ Expected CounterMappingContext::evaluate(const
Counter &C) const {
return LastPoppedValue;
}
+mcdc::TVIdxBuilder::TVIdxBuilder(const SmallVectorImpl &NextIDs,
+ int Offset)
+: Indices(NextIDs.size()) {
+ // Construc
https://github.com/hanickadot requested changes to this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -723,7 +737,15 @@ struct MCDCCoverageBuilder {
if (I == CondIDs.end())
return -1;
else
- return I->second;
+ return I->second.ID;
+ }
+
+ void ccc(const Expr *CondExpr, mcdc::ConditionIDs IDs) {
hanickadot wrote:
this should be nam
https://github.com/hanickadot edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -13503,6 +13503,9 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, IncorrectCodeUnbalancedBraces) {
verifyFormat("{");
verifyFormat("#})");
verifyNoCrash("(/**/[:!] ?[).");
+ verifyNoCrash("struct X{"
+" operator iunt("
owenca wrote:
```suggestion
verifyNoCr
@@ -199,15 +214,31 @@ RValue
CodeGenFunction::EmitAMDGPUDevicePrintfCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) {
}
llvm::Value *Arg = A.getRValue(*this).getScalarVal();
+if (isString(A.getType().getTypePtr()) && CGM.getLangOpts().OpenCL)
ssahasra wrote:
The typ
@@ -198,15 +213,31 @@ RValue
CodeGenFunction::EmitAMDGPUDevicePrintfCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) {
}
llvm::Value *Arg = A.getRValue(*this).getScalarVal();
+if (isString(A.getType().getTypePtr()) && CGM.getLangOpts().OpenCL)
+ Arg = Builder.CreateAddrSpaceCast(
@@ -178,17 +181,29 @@ RValue
CodeGenFunction::EmitNVPTXDevicePrintfCallExpr(const CallExpr *E) {
E, this, GetVprintfDeclaration(CGM.getModule()), false);
}
+// Deterimines if an argument is a string
+static bool isString(const clang::Type *argXTy) {
ssa
https://github.com/phoebewang edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82422
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2099,9 +2099,11 @@ static __inline__ __m128i __DEFAULT_FN_ATTRS
_mm_add_epi64(__m128i __a,
}
/// Adds, with saturation, the corresponding elements of two 128-bit
-///signed [16 x i8] vectors, saving each sum in the corresponding element
of
-///a 128-bit result ve
@@ -3817,7 +3817,7 @@ void
TokenAnnotator::calculateFormattingInformation(AnnotatedLine &Line) const {
do {
Tok = Tok->Next;
} while (Tok && Tok->isNot(TT_OverloadedOperatorLParen));
-if (!Tok)
+if (!Tok || !Tok->Next)
4vtomat wrote:
Rebase
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77560
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
> The OOM is not limited to `guessLanguage()`. [...] It occurs even if you
> rename the header files to .cpp files and clang-format the renamed files
> directly.
I'm aware of that.
However, for clangd users, a crucial difference between `guessLanguage()` vs.
other code
Author: Owen Pan
Date: 2024-02-20T21:51:51-08:00
New Revision: 04fbc461e0fd1c6f2b014761e9c03ca80d17b33b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04fbc461e0fd1c6f2b014761e9c03ca80d17b33b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/04fbc461e0fd1c6f2b014761e9c03ca80d17b33b.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/owenca closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82278
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vikramRH wrote:
The new set of changes adds following changes,
1. The iteration over vector elements now happens using vector size from the
format specifier as reference, this is inline with runtime implementation and
helps handling undefined behavior when we have a mismatch.
2. The error flag
jcsxky wrote:
> @jcsxky Do you have more test cases other than the one from #76674? I wonder
> what'll happen if constraint checking is involved.
Do you mean `concept`? If yes, I will have a try.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80802
___
cf
haoNoQ wrote:
Ooo interesting. I want to spend a bit more time thinking whether this has to
go into every callback, maybe it can be a set-and-forget thing? (Probably not.)
Also it might be a good idea to cache only statements that may ever get
directly queried. (This seems to be exactly necess
hstk30-hw wrote:
Some project use `Werror` strictly,
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/306 add the
`-no-deprecated-warn` option,
but we can't pass the flags from clang to llvm-mc, change the makefile to use
`llvm-mc` to generate obj just for some file is inconvenience.
https://
https://github.com/cyndyishida updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82293
>From bd648b50002a64ec098ff450cc6dacc0bc6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyndy Ishida
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:06:30 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert " [clang][InstallAPI] Introduce basic driver to
wr
@@ -983,7 +979,7 @@ void CodeGenPGO::mapRegionCounters(const Decl *D) {
// for most embedded applications. Setting a maximum value prevents the
// bitmap footprint from growing too large without the user's knowledge. In
// the future, this value could be adjusted with a c
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81335
>From efa382134783898ab2613f13f46dfc3384a3795e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:51:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ObjC] Add pre-commi
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81335
>From efa382134783898ab2613f13f46dfc3384a3795e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:51:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ObjC] Add pre-commi
https://github.com/AtariDreams updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81335
>From efa382134783898ab2613f13f46dfc3384a3795e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose <83477269+ataridre...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:51:15 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [ObjC] Add pre-commi
https://github.com/ilinpv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82378
>From 7ada935c9000e915acc9433341e8d4317ff158d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Iliin
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 02:01:04 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [AArch64] Implement __builtin_cpu_supports, compiler-rt
tests.
@@ -886,28 +886,16 @@ llvm::ARM::FPUKind arm::getARMTargetFeatures(const Driver
&D,
} else {
// Assume pre-ARMv6 doesn't support unaligned accesses.
//
-// ARMv6 may or may not support unaligned accesses depending on the
-// SCTLR.U bit, which is architecture
https://github.com/rniwa updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82209
>From 1d53adbe50d8afb7c91e8b393c64d6f590256602 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 21:47:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Support RefAllowingPartiallyDestroyed and
RefPtrAllow
@@ -103,15 +103,18 @@ std::optional isRefCountable(const CXXRecordDecl* R)
return hasRef && hasDeref;
}
+bool isRefType(const std::string &name) {
+ return name == "Ref" || name == "RefAllowingPartiallyDestroyed" ||
+ name == "RefPtr" || name == "RefPtrAllowingParti
@@ -983,7 +979,7 @@ void CodeGenPGO::mapRegionCounters(const Decl *D) {
// for most embedded applications. Setting a maximum value prevents the
// bitmap footprint from growing too large without the user's knowledge. In
// the future, this value could be adjusted with a c
https://github.com/kees approved this pull request.
Working as expected for me!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Nico Weber
Date: 2024-02-20T20:24:32-05:00
New Revision: 84ed55e11f8d8f434395f869a1caa8485dd0c187
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/84ed55e11f8d8f434395f869a1caa8485dd0c187
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/84ed55e11f8d8f434395f869a1caa8485dd0c187.diff
LO
nico wrote:
Also failing here https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/259/builds/126 and
here https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/139/builds/59858
Given that the bots have been broken for a few hours now, I'll revert.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82298
__
nico wrote:
The test is failing at least on my bot:
http://45.33.8.238/linux/131314/step_7.txt
I'm guessing this is some unicode/sed thing? It's a pretty vanilla linux
machine.
(It uses a non-standard non-supported build system, but at least from a
distance that looks unrelated?)
https://gi
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -1404,6 +1486,47 @@ void StreamChecker::evalFeofFerror(const FnDescription
*Desc,
}
}
+void StreamChecker::evalFileno(const FnDescription *Desc, const CallEvent
&Call,
+ CheckerContext &C)
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -268,6 +268,16 @@ void test_clearerr(FILE *F) {
// expected-warning@-1{{FALSE}}
}
+void test_fileno(FILE *F) {
+ errno = 0;
+ int A = fileno(F);
+ clang_analyzer_eval(F != NU
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/benshi001 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/benshi001 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81842
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kees wrote:
This doesn't seem to do anything for me with the Linux kernel's -next branch
(which supports -sio as `CONFIG_UBSAN_SIGNED_WRAP=y`). e.g. I see no behavioral
difference with test_ubsan.ko nor the expected atomic overflows.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432
https://github.com/rniwa closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82156
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Ryosuke Niwa
Date: 2024-02-20T17:12:24-08:00
New Revision: 031f9f331723e6bebc405ffdee4b8a87a5fc0472
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/031f9f331723e6bebc405ffdee4b8a87a5fc0472
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/031f9f331723e6bebc405ffdee4b8a87a5fc0472.diff
rniwa wrote:
Yeah, indeed. Thank you for the review!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82156
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -103,15 +103,18 @@ std::optional isRefCountable(const CXXRecordDecl* R)
return hasRef && hasDeref;
}
+bool isRefType(const std::string &name) {
+ return name == "Ref" || name == "RefAllowingPartiallyDestroyed" ||
+ name == "RefPtr" || name == "RefPtrAllowingParti
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
LGTM! I have one stylistic nitpick.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commit
@@ -103,15 +103,18 @@ std::optional isRefCountable(const CXXRecordDecl* R)
return hasRef && hasDeref;
}
+bool isRefType(const std::string &name) {
+ return name == "Ref" || name == "RefAllowingPartiallyDestroyed" ||
+ name == "RefPtr" || name == "RefPtrAllowingParti
https://github.com/haoNoQ edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82209
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chapuni edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81037
>From c9dc3ca27e6978a3b6595d094e32cbd9cd102f64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fangrui Song
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 12:56:05 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [Driver] Improve error when a compiler-rt library is not
found
BS
https://github.com/MaskRay closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82424
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Fangrui Song
Date: 2024-02-20T16:54:27-08:00
New Revision: 4ca0480a4fefe25c2f6e36c04f02998af79274a0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ca0480a4fefe25c2f6e36c04f02998af79274a0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4ca0480a4fefe25c2f6e36c04f02998af79274a0.diff
https://github.com/jwanggit86 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ def FeatureCuMode : SubtargetFeature<"cumode",
"Enable CU wavefront execution mode"
>;
+def FeaturePreciseMemory
jwanggit86 wrote:
A possible fix is to check `hasFlag` after calling `handleTargetFeaturesGroup`,
and if the check is true
https://github.com/jwanggit86 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/79236
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -167,6 +167,10 @@ def FeatureCuMode : SubtargetFeature<"cumode",
"Enable CU wavefront execution mode"
>;
+def FeaturePreciseMemory
jwanggit86 wrote:
@Pierre-vh With the suggested change, the func `getAMDGPUTargetFeatures` looks
something like the follow
Atousa wrote:
humble ping @AaronBallman
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80939
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/MaskRay approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82436
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Joseph Huber
Date: 2024-02-20T18:12:27-06:00
New Revision: 53e96984b6dbb9d8ff55d2ccd0c27ffc1d27315f
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53e96984b6dbb9d8ff55d2ccd0c27ffc1d27315f
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/53e96984b6dbb9d8ff55d2ccd0c27ffc1d27315f.diff
https://github.com/Artem-B approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82436
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/llvm-beanz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82395
>From 558dd6182a4dc6fc5c5383358cac422289a7a90b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bieneman
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:01:16 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [HLSL][Doc] Add doc about expected differences
This docu
https://github.com/barcharcraz ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/haoNoQ approved this pull request.
Ooo this is much cleaner!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82156
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/JustinStitt edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -70,6 +77,7 @@ void test1(void) {
// WRAPV: add i8 {{.*}}, 1
JustinStitt wrote:
How's
[1d9cb0a](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432/commits/1d9cb0aca8985aa1636780b3ff9a863962cc2d57)
look?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432
__
https://github.com/JustinStitt updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82432
>From b02b09b9eb4f9a8ac60dd077d95c67b959db3b70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Justin Stitt
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:21:02 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] support fwrapv with signed int overflow sanitizer
---
cl
@@ -886,28 +886,16 @@ llvm::ARM::FPUKind arm::getARMTargetFeatures(const Driver
&D,
} else {
// Assume pre-ARMv6 doesn't support unaligned accesses.
//
-// ARMv6 may or may not support unaligned accesses depending on the
-// SCTLR.U bit, which is architecture
@@ -305,6 +305,16 @@ X86 Support
Arm and AArch64 Support
^^^
+- ARMv6+ targets now default to allowing unaligned access, except Armv6-M, and
+ Armv8-M without the Main Extension. Baremetal targets should check that the
+ new default will work with their s
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82400
>From 20634c2f54ae667ee8374d12e58e582aa6cdd051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:34:57 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] =?UTF-8?q?[=F0=9D=98=80=F0=9D=97=BD=F0=9D=97=BF]=20in?=
=?UTF-8
https://github.com/damyanp approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82395
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Bigcheese closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82298
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Michael Spencer
Date: 2024-02-20T15:20:40-08:00
New Revision: 3ff805540173b83d73b673b39ac5760fc19bac15
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ff805540173b83d73b673b39ac5760fc19bac15
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/3ff805540173b83d73b673b39ac5760fc19bac15.dif
https://github.com/Bigcheese updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82298
>From b60972ed9183dd9e2deb3860f7732dc87bdfc84e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Spencer
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:05:25 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Canonicalize -D and -U flags
Canonicalize `-D` and `-U` flag
@@ -70,6 +77,7 @@ void test1(void) {
// WRAPV: add i8 {{.*}}, 1
MaskRay wrote:
L72 needs a `// CATCH_WRAP: getelementptr i32, ptr`
Actually, since -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow and -fwrapv
-fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow share so many checks. Perhaps
https://github.com/ahoppen approved this pull request.
Thanks for fixing!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82396
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
erichkeane wrote:
> Ok gotcha thanks! In any case, I'll do my best to handle this more gracefully
> in the future. Your advice is always appreciated!
Perfect! I'll try to be better about this in the future as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80371
__
1 - 100 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
