kartcq wrote:
ping @efriedma-quic @xgupta
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75141
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rikhuijzer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76292
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rikhuijzer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76292
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/rikhuijzer edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76292
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/kadircet edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75128
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -821,7 +821,8 @@ void SymbolCollector::setIncludeLocation(const Symbol &S,
SourceLocation DefLoc,
// Use the expansion location to get the #include header since this is
// where the symbol is exposed.
- IncludeFiles[S.ID] = SM.getDecomposedExpansionLoc(DefLoc).first;
https://github.com/kadircet approved this pull request.
thanks and sorry for leaving this out there, I was busy with other things and
then OOO.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75128
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
htt
https://github.com/lifengxiang1025 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76497
>From 4ae12256cfe621e3051ac4deee60cd1da6c54a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lifengxiang
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:57:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Propeller] Add new flag option
'-basic-block-sections
https://github.com/rikhuijzer updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76292
>From 0ff5a0ec09f7c26824bd90e6c7656222ee2448ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rik Huijzer
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 16:32:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [mlir][vector] Fix invalid `LoadOp` indices being created
---
Zingam wrote:
Thank you very much for the review. I'll wait a few days for addional feedback
before I land this PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74994
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/
https://github.com/lifengxiang1025 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76497
>From 4ae12256cfe621e3051ac4deee60cd1da6c54a65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lifengxiang
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:57:54 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Propeller] Add new flag option
'-basic-block-sections
brad0 wrote:
@MaskRay Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71157
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
@sam-mccall ping~ what's the fate of the patch?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/66462
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
petrhosek wrote:
This appears to have broken the LSan build which is now failing with the
following error:
```
FAILED:
compiler-rt/lib/lsan/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.lsan_osx_dynamic.dir/lsan_malloc_mac.cpp.o
/Volumes/Work/s/w/ir/x/w/llvm_build/./bin/clang++
--target=x86_64-apple-darwin22.6.0
--s
https://github.com/jamesg-nz edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76673
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -366,8 +366,14 @@ bool ContinuationIndenter::mustBreak(const LineState
&State) {
const auto &CurrentState = State.Stack.back();
if (Style.BraceWrapping.BeforeLambdaBody && Current.CanBreakBefore &&
Current.is(TT_LambdaLBrace) && Previous.isNot(TT_LineComment)) {
-
https://github.com/SixWeining closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SixWeining edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/SixWeining edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74990
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 approved this pull request.
LGTM with nits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -944,6 +944,9 @@ TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_pack_vector_int128,
"V1LLLiULLiULLi", "", "vsx")
// Set the floating point rounding mode
BUILTIN(__builtin_setrnd, "di", "")
+// Barrier for instruction motion
+BUILTIN(__builtin_ppc_fence, "v", "")
chenzheng1030 w
https://github.com/chenzheng1030 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76495
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -944,6 +944,9 @@ TARGET_BUILTIN(__builtin_pack_vector_int128,
"V1LLLiULLiULLi", "", "vsx")
// Set the floating point rounding mode
BUILTIN(__builtin_setrnd, "di", "")
+// Barrier for instruction motion
chenzheng1030 wrote:
Can we add some comments here to
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
@@ -17132,6 +17132,10 @@ static bool ConvertAPValueToString(const APValue &V,
QualType T,
case BuiltinType::WChar_U: {
unsigned TyWidth = Context.getIntWi
schenka0 wrote:
I struggled to rebase my changes around some merges and accidently included
additional changes at one point which triggered the llvmbot to add extra tags.
Sorry!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76668
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -813,6 +813,21 @@ TEST(SourceCodeTests, isKeywords) {
EXPECT_FALSE(isKeyword("override", LangOpts));
}
+TEST(SourceCodeTests, isSpelledInSource) {
+ Annotations Test(R"cpp(
+int abc = 1;
+)cpp");
+
+ ParsedAST AST = TestTU::withCode(Test.code()).build();
+
https://github.com/schenka0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76668
>From fd5e586d807fa4532f26188822ac5790202673bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: schenka0 <154034018+schen...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 01:31:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Check for invalid SLo
benshi001 wrote:
I am not familiar with swift. So is there an official document for the SWIFT
specific ABI on AVR? I think this is necessary, just like C++:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/avr-gcc.
And what's more, tests are required to be committed with functional changes,
this is a requirement for
dtcxzyw wrote:
> Can you please fix or revert
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/24592 ?
Should be fixed by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7e405eb722e40c79b7726201d0f76b5dab34ba0f.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/24613
https://github.com/llvm/
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/changkhothuychung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75902
>From 4939edb1cb2b73f9c60c4cce0803fab4888beb6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=E2=80=9C
jamesg-nz wrote:
> I think that's not the right way to fix the issue.
>
> Why are the 2 lines formatted differently? It seems to me that this fixes the
> symptom, not the cause.
Because for the line where brackets are used it meets the condition in the next
`if` statement down:
https://githu
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?= ,
=?utf-8?q?“Nhat?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/changkhothuychung updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75902
>From 4939edb1cb2b73f9c60c4cce0803fab4888beb6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=E2=80=9CNhat?=
Date: Mon, 1
ddpagan wrote:
Ping.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/72417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
SixWeining wrote:
LGTM. I have checked with
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Machine-Constraints.html. 'G' stands for
"A floating point constant 0.0". But I'd like to wait others' opinion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76561
___
cfe-
https://github.com/benshi001 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76561
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benshi001 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76561
>From 75164dccb2697ad5468700a9f23a0bc7d8ab49e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:58:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][AVR] Restrict range of assembly constraint 'G'
According to
benshi001 wrote:
> LGTM
Thanks for your help!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76671
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -22965,6 +22965,84 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, EmptyLinesInLambdas) {
"};");
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, BreakBeforeLambdaBodyWrapping) {
+ verifyFormat("connect([]() {\n"
+ " foo();\n"
+ " bar();\n"
+ "});");
+
+ auto Style
https://github.com/jamesg-nz updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76673
>From 04885844162b5390d8041a44a1895ad6ac160228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Grant <42079499+jamesg...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 20:27:41 +1300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Fi
dtcxzyw wrote:
> > Yeah, we should skip this inference for functions with the sanitize_memory
> > attribute.
>
> I will post a patch later.
Candidate patch: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76691
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76553
rjmccall wrote:
> That makes a lot of sense. Thank you John. I guess here are my thoughts. As I
> understand it, the `SwiftABIInfo` by default does something like "if
> something can be passed in 4 registers or fewer then pass by register,
> otherwise pass indirectly"? I think that sweet spot
dtcxzyw wrote:
> Yeah, we should skip this inference for functions with the sanitize_memory
> attribute.
I will post a patch later.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.
nikic wrote:
Yeah, we should skip this inference for functions with the sanitize_memory
attribute.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
dtcxzyw wrote:
> Can you please fix or revert
> https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/24592 ?
Thank you for reporting this! I will check the error log.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
vitalybuka wrote:
Another problem is that there was assumption that definition and declaration
will be consistent, for msan is a part of ABI.
Clang will generate them consistently for all modules, with declaration and
definition of the function.
Is possible that after this patch some definitio
vitalybuka wrote:
```
This patch deduces noundef attributes for return values.
IIUC, a function returns noundef values iff all of its return values are
guaranteed not to be undef or poison.
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76553
___
cfe-c
vitalybuka wrote:
Can you please fix or revert
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/74/builds/24592 ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76688
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
Pushed as 7619050cd7c3715f34c1d13ea048c092299037bb and
8ee3dfd74653e30f48dd9f49ba24f43547e6a549 respectively.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76688
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.or
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-01-01T22:00:32+01:00
New Revision: 8ee3dfd74653e30f48dd9f49ba24f43547e6a549
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ee3dfd74653e30f48dd9f49ba24f43547e6a549
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8ee3dfd74653e30f48dd9f49ba24f43547e6a549.diff
Author: Balazs Benics
Date: 2024-01-01T22:00:32+01:00
New Revision: 7619050cd7c3715f34c1d13ea048c092299037bb
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7619050cd7c3715f34c1d13ea048c092299037bb
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7619050cd7c3715f34c1d13ea048c092299037bb.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74994
>From 6e26ca239c49e1b7d9ab72217db7339e92df163f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 14:16:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/18] [libc++][span] P2821R5: span.at()
---
libcxx/include/span
Rajveer100 wrote:
@cor3ntin
Could you help me in closing this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70594
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
LGTM! Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76688
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76671
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76671
>From 0c586914ac977920140472d172ee357dea43f2c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Shi
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:48:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Improve 'errno' modeling of 'mkdtemp'
---
.../C
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ class InvalidatedIteratorChecker
check::PreStmt,
check::PreStmt> {
- std::unique_ptr InvalidatedBugType;
+ const BugType InvalidatedBugType{this, "Iterator invalidated",
+ "Misuse of
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balazs Benics (steakhal)
Changes
---
Patch is 28.26 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76688.diff
14 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/StaticAna
https://github.com/steakhal created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76688
None
>From 70c03932cad401f477674881050a8f0c4b573cdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:59:46 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer][NFC] Take StringRef by value
---
.../Check
https://github.com/steakhal closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -52,10 +52,13 @@ class SimpleStreamChecker : public Checker {
- CallDescription OpenFn, CloseFn;
+ const CallDescription OpenFn{{"fopen"}, 2};
+ const CallDescription CloseFn{{"fclose"}, 1};
steakhal wrote:
Here is why we can't have CallDescriptions constex
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76655
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -52,10 +52,13 @@ class SimpleStreamChecker : public Checker {
- CallDescription OpenFn, CloseFn;
+ const CallDescription OpenFn{{"fopen"}, 2};
+ const CallDescription CloseFn{{"fclose"}, 1};
steakhal wrote:
Well, it seems like `StringRef` is not constexpr f
@@ -17,19 +17,18 @@
#include "MPITypes.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
namespace clang {
namespace ento {
namespace mpi {
class MPIBugReporter {
public:
- MPIBugReporter(const CheckerBase &CB) {
-Unma
@@ -31,14 +31,14 @@ class InvalidatedIteratorChecker
check::PreStmt,
check::PreStmt> {
- std::unique_ptr InvalidatedBugType;
+ const BugType InvalidatedBugType{this, "Iterator invalidated",
+ "Misuse of
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/philnik777 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74994
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/philnik777 approved this pull request.
Other than the test this LGTM.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74994
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/schenka0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76668
>From fd5e586d807fa4532f26188822ac5790202673bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: schenka0 <154034018+schen...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 01:31:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Check for invalid SLo
11happy wrote:
I have added the tests as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/11happy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76680
>From 3c8dfcf96e732f4546f8019c0111fd873b233162 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: 11happy
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 19:53:45 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Changed Checks from TriviallyCopyable to
TriviallyCopyConstructible
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
I think that's not the right way to fix the issue.
Why are the 2 lines formatted differently? It seems to me that this fixes the
symptom, not the cause.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76675
___
cfe-commits mailing
@@ -22965,6 +22965,84 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, EmptyLinesInLambdas) {
"};");
}
+TEST_F(FormatTest, BreakBeforeLambdaBodyWrapping) {
+ verifyFormat("connect([]() {\n"
+ " foo();\n"
+ " bar();\n"
+ "});");
+
+ auto Style
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76632
>From 1165b11477ab59122a4db35221fcefe3c9505387 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zingam
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 17:34:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/16] [libc++][streams] P1759R6: Native handles and file
streams
I
https://github.com/schenka0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76668
>From fd5e586d807fa4532f26188822ac5790202673bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: schenka0 <154034018+schen...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 01:31:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Check for invalid SLocEnt
H-G-Hristov wrote:
This test is failing but I have no idea how to fix it:
@github-actions
Build and Test libc++ / stage3 (generic-no-localization, libcxx-runners-8-set,
OFF) (pull_request) Failing after 1m
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/7377144646/job/20072043476?pr=76632#s
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76632
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/hstk30-hw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75440
>From ce9db667e6567532fe119ff8d793281215f223dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hstk30-hw
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 15:40:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] feat: arm_acle.h add Coprocessor Instrinsics
---
clang/lib/Basic/
Endilll wrote:
> Sure I can , I have also tested the code that was giving erroneous warnings,
> so should I add that example as well??
Yes. Clang has a special mode which check which diagnostics are emitted:
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#verifying-diagnostics
https://github
11happy wrote:
Sure I can , I have also tested the code that was giving erroneous warnings, so
should I add that example as well??
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
@@ -302,3 +302,64 @@ extern __typeof__(__builtin_expect(0, 0)) bi0;
// Strings
int array1[__builtin_strlen("ab\0cd")];
int array2[(sizeof(array1)/sizeof(int)) == 2? 1 : -1];
+
+typedef double vector4double __attribute__((__vector_size__(32)));
+typedef float vector4float __attr
@@ -302,3 +302,64 @@ extern __typeof__(__builtin_expect(0, 0)) bi0;
// Strings
int array1[__builtin_strlen("ab\0cd")];
int array2[(sizeof(array1)/sizeof(int)) == 2? 1 : -1];
+
+typedef double vector4double __attribute__((__vector_size__(32)));
+typedef float vector4float __attr
Endilll wrote:
Can you add some tests?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76680
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -302,3 +302,64 @@ extern __typeof__(__builtin_expect(0, 0)) bi0;
// Strings
int array1[__builtin_strlen("ab\0cd")];
int array2[(sizeof(array1)/sizeof(int)) == 2? 1 : -1];
+
+typedef double vector4double __attribute__((__vector_size__(32)));
+typedef float vector4float __attr
https://github.com/schenka0 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76668
>From c9e2b9ad57aa9bac52324c91fe6d4ec1aa39ff41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: schenka0 <154034018+schen...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2024 01:31:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Check for invalid SLo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Bhuminjay Soni (11happy)
Changes
**Overview:**
This pull request fixes #47355 where in the Clang compiler's
range-loop-analysis incorrectly checks for trivial copyability instead of
trivial copy constructibility, leading to erroneous warn
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it i
https://github.com/11happy created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76680
**Overview:**
This pull request fixes #47355 where in the Clang compiler's
range-loop-analysis incorrectly checks for trivial copyability instead of
trivial copy constructibility, leading to erroneous warnings.
@@ -302,3 +302,64 @@ extern __typeof__(__builtin_expect(0, 0)) bi0;
// Strings
int array1[__builtin_strlen("ab\0cd")];
int array2[(sizeof(array1)/sizeof(int)) == 2? 1 : -1];
+
+typedef double vector4double __attribute__((__vector_size__(32)));
+typedef float vector4float __attr
@@ -10895,6 +10899,138 @@ bool VectorExprEvaluator::VisitUnaryOperator(const
UnaryOperator *E) {
return Success(APValue(ResultElements.data(), ResultElements.size()), E);
}
+static bool EvaluateVectorOrLValue(APValue &Result, EvalInfo &Info,
+
https://github.com/H-G-Hristov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73617
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+//===--===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apac
https://github.com/sdkrystian edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sdkrystian wrote:
Ping @erichkeane
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76677
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Krystian Stasiowski (sdkrystian)
Changes
This diagnoses unexpanded packs in the _unqualified-id_ of a function template
specialization's _declarator-id_, e.g.:
```cpp
template
struct A
{
template
void f(
https://github.com/sdkrystian created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76677
This diagnoses unexpanded packs in the _unqualified-id_ of a function template
specialization's _declarator-id_, e.g.:
```cpp
template
struct A
{
template
void f();
template<>
void f(); // err
@@ -10895,6 +10899,138 @@ bool VectorExprEvaluator::VisitUnaryOperator(const
UnaryOperator *E) {
return Success(APValue(ResultElements.data(), ResultElements.size()), E);
}
+static bool EvaluateVectorOrLValue(APValue &Result, EvalInfo &Info,
+
@@ -302,3 +302,64 @@ extern __typeof__(__builtin_expect(0, 0)) bi0;
// Strings
int array1[__builtin_strlen("ab\0cd")];
int array2[(sizeof(array1)/sizeof(int)) == 2? 1 : -1];
+
+typedef double vector4double __attribute__((__vector_size__(32)));
+typedef float vector4float __attr
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
