[PATCH] D45815: [libclang] Allow skipping function bodies in preamble only

nik added a comment. Do I miss something? I've uploaded a new diff/version and state is still "(X) Requested Changes to Prior Diff". Waiting for review. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45815 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commi

[PATCH] D41537: Optionally add code completion results for arrow instead of dot

yvvan added a comment. Ping https://reviews.llvm.org/D41537 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46180: [clang-format] Refactor #include insertion/deletion functionality into a class.

ioeric added a comment. Friendly ping. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46180 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D45476: [C++2a] Implement operator<=> CodeGen and ExprConstant

EricWF added inline comments. Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:8931 + /*ConstArg*/ true, false, false, false, false); + auto *CopyCtor = cast_or_null(SMI.getMethod()); + rjmccall wrote: > Sorry, I didn't realize you'd go off and writ

[PATCH] D46286: [Driver] Don't warn about unused inputs in config files

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rC331504: [Driver] Don't warn about unused inputs in config files (authored by mstorsjo, committed by ). Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46286 Files: lib/Driver/Driver.cpp test/Driver

r331504 - [Driver] Don't warn about unused inputs in config files

Author: mstorsjo Date: Thu May 3 23:05:58 2018 New Revision: 331504 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331504&view=rev Log: [Driver] Don't warn about unused inputs in config files This avoids warnings about unused linker parameters, just like other flags are ignored if they're from con

[PATCH] D45476: [C++2a] Implement operator<=> CodeGen and ExprConstant

rjmccall added inline comments. Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:8931 + /*ConstArg*/ true, false, false, false, false); + auto *CopyCtor = cast_or_null(SMI.getMethod()); + Sorry, I didn't realize you'd go off and write this code manu

[PATCH] D45131: [AST] Refactor UnaryTransformType into TransformTraitType supporting non-unary transforms

EricWF planned changes to this revision. EricWF marked 7 inline comments as done. EricWF added inline comments. Comment at: include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h:5262-5266 +AST_MATCHER(Type, unaryTransformType) { + if (const auto *T = Node.getAs()) +return T->getNumArgs()

[PATCH] D46286: [Driver] Don't warn about unused inputs in config files

sepavloff accepted this revision. sepavloff added a comment. With additional changes the fix is OK. LGTM. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46286 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-com

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

jdenny added inline comments. Comment at: lib/AST/DeclPrinter.cpp:180-181 if (isFirst) { - if(TD) -SubPolicy.IncludeTagDefinition = true; + if (TD) +SubPolicy.TagSpecifierAs = TD; SubPolicy.SuppressSpecifiers = false; rsmith

[PATCH] D46374: Add support for ObjC property name to be a single acronym.

Wizard marked 3 inline comments as done. Wizard added inline comments. Comment at: test/clang-tidy/objc-property-declaration.m:24 @property(assign, nonatomic) int enableGLAcceleration; +@property(assign, nonatomic) int ID; @end benhamilton wrote: > Please add a

[PATCH] D46374: Add support for ObjC property name to be a single acronym.

Wizard updated this revision to Diff 145145. Wizard added a comment. resolve comments Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D46374 Files: clang-tidy/objc/PropertyDeclarationCheck.cpp test/clang-tidy/objc-property-declaration-custom.m test/clang-tidy/objc-property-

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

rsmith added inline comments. Comment at: lib/AST/DeclPrinter.cpp:180-181 if (isFirst) { - if(TD) -SubPolicy.IncludeTagDefinition = true; + if (TD) +SubPolicy.TagSpecifierAs = TD; SubPolicy.SuppressSpecifiers = false; rsmith

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

rsmith added inline comments. Comment at: lib/AST/DeclPrinter.cpp:180-181 if (isFirst) { - if(TD) -SubPolicy.IncludeTagDefinition = true; + if (TD) +SubPolicy.TagSpecifierAs = TD; SubPolicy.SuppressSpecifiers = false; aaron.b

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

aaron.ballman added inline comments. Comment at: lib/AST/DeclPrinter.cpp:180-181 if (isFirst) { - if(TD) -SubPolicy.IncludeTagDefinition = true; + if (TD) +SubPolicy.TagSpecifierAs = TD; SubPolicy.SuppressSpecifiers = false;

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

jdenny added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45463#1087174, @rsmith wrote: > > TagSpecifierAs expands sizeof(PrintingPolicy) from 8 to 16 bytes. My > > concern is the comments on PrintingPolicy about how PrintingPolicy is > > intended to be small. My guess it that 16 bytes is still smal

[PATCH] D45532: [StaticAnalyzer] Checker to find uninitialized fields after a constructor call

NoQ added inline comments. Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/UninitializedObjectChecker.cpp:258-260 +Report->addNote(NoteBuf, +PathDiagnosticLocation::create(FieldChain.getEndOfChain(), + Context.get

Re: [libcxxabi] r331150 - Move _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_UNEXPECTED_FUNCTIONS macro to build system

Yes, it did. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.linaro.org > On May 3, 2018, at 3:48 PM, Nico Weber wrote: > > r331450 should hopefully fix this. > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Nico Weber wrote: > tzik, can you take a look what's up on those bots? > > On Tue, May 1, 2018, 5:48 AM Maxim Ku

[PATCH] D46415: [analyzer] pr36458: Fix retrieved value cast for symbolic void pointers.

NoQ created this revision. NoQ added reviewers: dcoughlin, xazax.hun, a.sidorin, george.karpenkov, szepet, rnkovacs. Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, baloghadamsoftware. Through C cast magic it's possible to put a raw void pointer into a variable of non-void pointer type. It is fine - gene

[PATCH] D46410: [Target] Diagnose mismatch in required CPU for always_inline functions

craig.topper added a comment. From the backend codegen perspective it would be fine if the callees instruction features were a subset. So it really depends on why the user wrote the different arch on the callee in the first place. If they did it because of one of the various tuning flags in the

r331496 - [analyzer] NFC: Remove unused parameteer of StoreManager::CastRetrievedVal().

Author: dergachev Date: Thu May 3 17:53:41 2018 New Revision: 331496 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331496&view=rev Log: [analyzer] NFC: Remove unused parameteer of StoreManager::CastRetrievedVal(). Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Store.h

[PATCH] D46410: [Target] Diagnose mismatch in required CPU for always_inline functions

echristo added a comment. I like the idea of a front end warning, but had believed that a subset of cpu features should be allowed to be inlined into something that's a superset and it sounds like you don't agree? Your thoughts here? -eric https://reviews.llvm.org/D46410 __

[PATCH] D45679: [clang-tidy] Add a helper function isModified, that checks whether an expression is modified within a statement.

shuaiwang updated this revision to Diff 145121. shuaiwang marked 4 inline comments as done. shuaiwang added a comment. Addressed review comments, notably added check for DeclRefExpr to volatile variables. Repository: rCTE Clang Tools Extra https://reviews.llvm.org/D45679 Files: clang-tidy

[PATCH] D45679: [clang-tidy] Add a helper function isModified, that checks whether an expression is modified within a statement.

shuaiwang added inline comments. Comment at: clang-tidy/utils/ExprMutationAnalyzer.cpp:82-83 +const auto *E = RefNodes.getNodeAs("expr"); +if (findMutation(E)) + return E; + } aaron.ballman wrote: > Why does this not return the result of `findMutati

[PATCH] D46241: [CodeGen] Recognize more cases of zero initialization

rsmith added inline comments. Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp:1413 + } else if (!Init->isEvaluatable(CE.CGM.getContext())) { +return false; + } else if (InitTy->hasPointerRepresentation()) { sepavloff wrote: > rjmccall wrote: > > Aren't the null-

[PATCH] D45860: [Coroutines] Catch exceptions in await_resume

GorNishanov accepted this revision. GorNishanov added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45860 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

rsmith added a comment. > TagSpecifierAs expands sizeof(PrintingPolicy) from 8 to 16 bytes. My concern > is the comments on PrintingPolicy about how PrintingPolicy is intended to be > small. My guess it that 16 bytes is still small enough, but perhaps Richard > Smith, who wrote that comment, kn

[PATCH] D46386: Adding __atomic_fetch_min/max intrinsics to clang

rjmccall added a comment. Given that these are overloaded builtins, why are there separate builtins for `min` and `umin`? If this is a Clang extension, it needs to be documented in our extensions documentation. The documentation should describe the exact ordering semantics, to the extent we w

[PATCH] D45131: [AST] Refactor UnaryTransformType into TransformTraitType supporting non-unary transforms

rsmith added inline comments. Comment at: include/clang/AST/TypeLoc.h:1992-1993 + unsigned getExtraLocalDataAlignment() const { +static_assert(alignof(TransformTraitTypeLoc) >= alignof(TypeSourceInfo *), + "not enough alignment for tail-allocated data"); +

[PATCH] D46410: [Target] Diagnose mismatch in required CPU for always_inline functions

craig.topper created this revision. craig.topper added reviewers: echristo, erichkeane. If an always inline function requests a different CPU than its caller we should probably error. If the callee CPU has features that the caller CPU doesn't we would already error for the feature mismatch, but

[PATCH] D45470: Emit an error when mixing and

vsapsai added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45470#1087026, @jfb wrote: > This isn't bad, so I'd go with it, but separately I imagine that we could > implement the suggestion in http://wg21.link/p0943 and expose it even before > C++20? Not sure we do this much, but I'd argue that befor

[PATCH] D46363: Follow-up to r331378. Update tests to allow to use C atomics in C++.

vsapsai added a comment. Thanks for the quick review. Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D46363 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46363: Follow-up to r331378. Update tests to allow to use C atomics in C++.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL331484: Follow-up to r331378. Update tests to allow to use C atomics in C++. (authored by vsapsai, committed by ). Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, delcypher. Changed prior to commit: https://rev

[PATCH] D46286: [Driver] Don't warn about unused inputs in config files

mstorsjo added a comment. @sepavloff - does the additional change to this one also look fine to you? https://reviews.llvm.org/D46286 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D45476: [C++2a] Implement operator<=> CodeGen and ExprConstant

EricWF added inline comments. Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp:1002 + return EmitFinalDestCopy( + E->getType(), CGF.MakeNaturalAlignAddrLValue(Select, E->getType())); +} EricWF wrote: > rjmccall wrote: > > Is there something in Sema actually validating

[PATCH] D45470: Emit an error when mixing and

jfb added a comment. This isn't bad, so I'd go with it, but separately I imagine that we could implement the suggestion in http://wg21.link/p0943 and expose it even before C++20? Not sure we do this much, but I'd argue that before that fix stdatomic.h is just useless anyways, so it's a fine bre

[PATCH] D45131: [AST] Refactor UnaryTransformType into TransformTraitType supporting non-unary transforms

EricWF marked 12 inline comments as done. EricWF added a comment. Ping. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45131 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D45463: [AST] Print correct tag decl for tag specifier

jdenny updated this revision to Diff 145092. jdenny removed a reviewer: jbcoe. jdenny added a comment. Rebased. Ping. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45463 Files: include/clang-c/Index.h include/clang/AST/PrettyPrinter.h lib/AST/DeclPrinter.cpp lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp test/Misc/ast-print-e

r331483 - [X86] Make __builtin_ia32_directstore_u32 and __builtin_ia32_movdir64b 'nothrow'

Author: ctopper Date: Thu May 3 14:01:35 2018 New Revision: 331483 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331483&view=rev Log: [X86] Make __builtin_ia32_directstore_u32 and __builtin_ia32_movdir64b 'nothrow' These builtins snuck in while I was in the middle of adding nothrow to the other

r331482 - [CodeGenFunction] Use the StringRef::split function that takes a char separator instead of StringRef separator. NFC

Author: ctopper Date: Thu May 3 14:01:33 2018 New Revision: 331482 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331482&view=rev Log: [CodeGenFunction] Use the StringRef::split function that takes a char separator instead of StringRef separator. NFC The char separator version should be a little

[PATCH] D45476: [C++2a] Implement operator<=> CodeGen and ExprConstant

EricWF added inline comments. Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprAgg.cpp:1002 + return EmitFinalDestCopy( + E->getType(), CGF.MakeNaturalAlignAddrLValue(Select, E->getType())); +} rjmccall wrote: > Is there something in Sema actually validating that the comparis

[PATCH] D45931: [ASTMatchers] Don't garble the profiling output when multiple TU's are processed

lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1086665, @alexfh wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1084503, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1083192, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > > > Thank you for looking at this. > > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm

[PATCH] D46374: Add support for ObjC property name to be a single acronym.

Wizard added inline comments. Comment at: clang-tidy/objc/PropertyDeclarationCheck.cpp:222 + [MatchedDecl](std::string const &s) { +return s == MatchedDecl->getName(); + })) { benhamilton wrote: > `s` is a reg

[PATCH] D46406: [docs] Fix typos in the Clang User's Manual.

jgalenson created this revision. jgalenson added reviewers: hans, sylvestre.ledru. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46406 Files: docs/UsersManual.rst Index: docs/UsersManual.rst === --- docs/UsersManual.rst +++ d

[PATCH] D45093: [AST] Fix -ast-print for _Bool when have diagnostics

jdenny updated this revision to Diff 145078. jdenny edited the summary of this revision. jdenny added a comment. Rebased. Added example to summary. Ping. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45093 Files: include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h include/clang/Sema/Sema.h lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp lib/Sema/Se

[PATCH] D45835: Add new driver mode for dumping compiler options

aaron.ballman updated this revision to Diff 145077. aaron.ballman added a comment. Updated to remove the contentious parts, though I still hope to add those back in. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45835 Files: include/clang/Basic/Features.def include/clang/Driver/CC1Options.td include/clang/F

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

vsk added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46403#1086923, @cmtice wrote: > Ok, I'll work on making this CFI-specific and adding a test case. Sounds good, thanks! I'd suggest modifying test/Driver/fsanitize-blacklist.c for your purposes. It should be possible to pair an empty resource di

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

cmtice added a comment. Ok, I'll work on making this CFI-specific and adding a test case. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46403 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46386: Adding __atomic_fetch_min/max intrinsics to clang

delena added inline comments. Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:3098 + case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_fetch_umax: +IsMinMax = true; +Form = Arithmetic; jfb wrote: > Should `__sync_fetch_and_min` and others also set `IsMinMax`? __sync_fetch_and_min is no

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

cmtice updated this revision to Diff 145073. cmtice added a comment. Tried to upload the diff from the correct location. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46403 Files: lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp Index: lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp ==

[PATCH] D46049: [OpenCL] Add constant address space to __func__ in AST

yaxunl accepted this revision. yaxunl added a comment. LGTM. Thanks! https://reviews.llvm.org/D46049 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

vsk requested changes to this revision. vsk added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. Toolchain vendors aren't currently required to provide default blacklists for every sanitizer clang supports. We don't ship a default ubsan blacklist on macOS, so this patch would break ub

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

pfultz2 updated this revision to Diff 145072. pfultz2 added a comment. Rename flag to `AllowEnablingAnalyzerAlphaCheckers`. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159 Files: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.cpp clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.h clang-tidy/tool/ClangTidyMain.cpp t

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

pfultz2 added inline comments. Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.h:80-82 + /// \brief Turns on experimental alpha checkers from the static analyzer. + llvm::Optional AllowEnablingAlphaChecks; + alexfh wrote: > Since this will only be configurable via a fl

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

lebedev.ri added a comment. Test? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46403 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46050: [Frontend] Avoid running plugins during code completion parse

thakis added inline comments. Comment at: test/Frontend/plugins.c:7 + +// RUN: c-index-test -code-completion-at=%s:6:1 -load %llvmshlibdir/PrintFunctionNames%pluginext -add-plugin print-fns %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-COMPLETION-WITHOUT-PLUGINS %s +// REQUIRES: plugins,

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

lebedev.ri added a comment. Also, please upload the correct patch, from the root of the repo, not from the directory of the file. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46403 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http:/

[PATCH] D46393: Remove explicit cfg-temporary-dtors=true

NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Thanks! Just curious - did these flags bother you? Cause we never really care about cleaning up run lines after flipping the flag, so we have a lot of such stale flags in our tests. We could start

[PATCH] D46403: [CFI] Force LLVM to die if the implicit blacklist files cannot be found.

cmtice created this revision. cmtice added a reviewer: pcc. Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits. Currently LLVM CFI tries to use an implicit blacklist file, currently in /usr/lib64/clang//share. If the file is not there, LLVM happily continues, which causes CFI to add checks to files/functio

[PATCH] D46042: Cap vector alignment at 16 for all Darwin platforms

rjmccall added a comment. I think we should seriously consider making alignment attributes on typedefs (and maybe some other attributes like may_alias) actual type qualifiers that are preserved in the canonical type, mangled, and so on. It would be an ABI break, but it'd also solve a lot of pr

[PATCH] D46386: Adding __atomic_fetch_min/max intrinsics to clang

jfb added inline comments. Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp:3098 + case AtomicExpr::AO__atomic_fetch_umax: +IsMinMax = true; +Form = Arithmetic; Should `__sync_fetch_and_min` and others also set `IsMinMax`? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.

[PATCH] D46042: Cap vector alignment at 16 for all Darwin platforms

ahatanak added a comment. > Note that this sort of attribute is stripped from template arguments in > template substitution, so there's a possibility that code templated over > vectors will produce inadequately-aligned objects. I was wondering whether there is a warning clang issues when the al

[clang-tools-extra] r331475 - Simplify test clang-tidy-__clang_analyzer__macro.cpp

Author: zinovy.nis Date: Thu May 3 11:31:39 2018 New Revision: 331475 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331475&view=rev Log: Simplify test clang-tidy-__clang_analyzer__macro.cpp Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/clang-tidy-__clang_analyzer__macro.cpp Modified:

[PATCH] D46325: [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility with clang static analyzer. 2nd try.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL331474: [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility… (authored by zinovy.nis, committed by ). Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, klimek. Changed prior to commit: h

[clang-tools-extra] r331474 - [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility with clang static analyzer

Author: zinovy.nis Date: Thu May 3 11:26:39 2018 New Revision: 331474 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331474&view=rev Log: [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility with clang static analyzer This macro is widely used in many well-known projects,

[PATCH] D45702: [clang-tidy] Add a new check, readability-redundant-data-call, that finds and removes redundant calls to .data().

shuaiwang added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45702#1086250, @aaron.ballman wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45702#1085890, @shuaiwang wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45702#1085224, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > > > > Have you run this over any large code bases to see wheth

[PATCH] D46325: [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility with clang static analyzer. 2nd try.

zinovy.nis added a comment. Thanks Alexander for your feedback! https://reviews.llvm.org/D46325 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46325: [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility with clang static analyzer. 2nd try.

alexfh accepted this revision. alexfh added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LG. Thank you! https://reviews.llvm.org/D46325 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

[PATCH] D46325: [clang-tidy] Define __clang_analyzer__ macro for clang-tidy for compatibility with clang static analyzer. 2nd try.

zinovy.nis updated this revision to Diff 145059. zinovy.nis added a comment. - Added comments on why setting `ProgramAction` explicitly. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46325 Files: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp test/clang-tidy/clang-tidy-__clang_analyzer__macro.cpp Index: test/clang-tidy/clang-tidy

[PATCH] D45931: [ASTMatchers] Don't garble the profiling output when multiple TU's are processed

lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1086665, @alexfh wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1084503, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1083192, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > > > Thank you for looking at this. > > > > > > In https://reviews.llvm

[PATCH] D46398: [ASTImporterTest] Fix potential use-after-free

a.sidorin created this revision. a.sidorin added reviewers: xazax.hun, martong, szepet, jingham. Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, rnkovacs. `buildASTFromCodeWithArgs()` accepts `llvm::Twine` as `Code` argument. However, if the argument is not a C string or std::string, the argument is being

[PATCH] D46241: [CodeGen] Recognize more cases of zero initialization

sepavloff marked an inline comment as done. sepavloff added inline comments. Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp:1403 + if (auto *IL = dyn_cast_or_null(Init)) { +if (InitTy->isConstantArrayType()) { + for (auto I : IL->inits()) rjmccall wrote: >

[PATCH] D46394: [clang-cl] Print /showIncludes to stderr, if used in combination with /E, /EP or /P

fxb added a comment. I'll have a look at these issues tomorrow and submit a new patch then. Thanks for all your help so far! https://reviews.llvm.org/D46394 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailm

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1086627, @alexfh wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1086493, @aaron.ballman wrote: > > > I think the premise is a bit off the mark. It's not that these are not for > > the common user -- it's that they're simply not ready

[PATCH] D46241: [CodeGen] Recognize more cases of zero initialization

sepavloff updated this revision to Diff 145049. sepavloff marked an inline comment as done. sepavloff added a comment. Small simplification Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46241 Files: lib/CodeGen/CGExprConstant.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/cxx11-initializer-aggregate.cpp Index:

[PATCH] D46370: [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rC331469: [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG (authored by jdenny, committed by ). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46370?vs=144949&id=145047#toc Repository: rC Clang

r331468 - Revert r331466: [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG"

Author: jdenny Date: Thu May 3 10:22:01 2018 New Revision: 331468 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331468&view=rev Log: Revert r331466: [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG" Sorry, forgot to add commit log attributes. Modified: cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/target_teams_d

r331469 - [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG

Author: jdenny Date: Thu May 3 10:22:04 2018 New Revision: 331469 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331469&view=rev Log: [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG Reviewed by: ABataev Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46370 Modified: cfe/trunk/test/OpenM

[PATCH] D46394: [clang-cl] Print /showIncludes to stderr, if used in combination with /E, /EP or /P

erichkeane requested changes to this revision. erichkeane added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. When building this, it didn't build since you'd reused the name. I changed the variable to be named "Dest" instead of "Destination" That said, the test suite now fails on Cl

r331466 - [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG

Author: jdenny Date: Thu May 3 10:15:44 2018 New Revision: 331466 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331466&view=rev Log: [OPENMP] Fix test typos: CHECK-DAG-N -> CHECK-N-DAG Modified: cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/target_teams_distribute_firstprivate_codegen.cpp cfe/trunk/test/OpenMP/

[PATCH] D46013: [ARM] Conform to AAPCS when passing overaligned composites as arguments

chill added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46013#1084440, @efriedma wrote: > I'd like to see some tests for __attribute((packed)). Thanks, indeed it does not work correctly on packed structures. Back to the drawing board ... Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46013

[PATCH] D45931: [ASTMatchers] Don't garble the profiling output when multiple TU's are processed

alexfh added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1084503, @lebedev.ri wrote: > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1083192, @lebedev.ri wrote: > > > Thank you for looking at this. > > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1083184, @alexfh wrote: > > > > > From a user's perspective I'd p

[PATCH] D46187: [Analyzer] getRegisteredCheckers(): handle debug checkers too.

alexfh added a comment. What's the use case for debug CSA checkers in clang-tidy? Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46187 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

alexfh requested changes to this revision. alexfh added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1086493, @aaron.ballman wrote: > I think the premise is a bit off the mark. It's not that these are not for > the common user -- it's that they're

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

xbolva00 added inline comments. Comment at: clang-tidy/tool/ClangTidyMain.cpp:195 +/// This option Enables alpha checkers from the static analyzer, that are +/// experimental. This option is set to false and not visible in help, because lebedev.ri wrote: > xbol

[PATCH] D26054: Use `getFileLoc()` instead of `getSpellingLoc()` in the ASTImporter

a.sidorin added a comment. I see,t hank you. Please feel free to submit a patch - it seems like you already have a nice test case that shows the difference between two import options. https://reviews.llvm.org/D26054 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cf

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

lebedev.ri added inline comments. Comment at: clang-tidy/tool/ClangTidyMain.cpp:195 +/// This option Enables alpha checkers from the static analyzer, that are +/// experimental. This option is set to false and not visible in help, because xbolva00 wrote: > This

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

pfultz2 added a comment. > When something is merged into Clang trunk, the expectation is that it will be > production quality or will be worked on rapidly to get it to production > quality, which is somewhat orthogonal to getting user feedback. I don't know > that I have the full history of all

[PATCH] D46394: [clang-cl] Print /showIncludes to stderr, if used in combination with /E, /EP or /P

fxb added a comment. @erichkeane That would be great! Thanks! https://reviews.llvm.org/D46394 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D46394: [clang-cl] Print /showIncludes to stderr, if used in combination with /E, /EP or /P

erichkeane accepted this revision. erichkeane added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. This looks fine to me. Let me know if you need me to commit this for you. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46394 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cf

[PATCH] D46394: [clang-cl] Print /showIncludes to stderr, if used in combination with /E, /EP or /P

fxb updated this revision to Diff 145030. fxb added a comment. Updated the code to use an enum called `ShowIncludesDestination` https://reviews.llvm.org/D46394 Files: include/clang/Frontend/DependencyOutputOptions.h lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp lib/Frontend/CompilerInstance.cpp lib/F

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

aaron.ballman added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159#1086553, @pfultz2 wrote: > > I think the premise is a bit off the mark. It's not that these are not for > > the common user -- it's that they're simply not ready for users at all. > > Then why was it merged into clang in the first

[PATCH] D33537: [clang-tidy] Exception Escape Checker

alexfh requested changes to this revision. alexfh added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. It looks like you've missed some comments or uploaded a wrong patch. Comment at: clang-tidy/bugprone/ExceptionEscapeCheck.cpp:105 +const TypeVec throwsException(con

[PATCH] D46159: [clang-tidy] Add a flag to enable alpha checkers

pfultz2 updated this revision to Diff 145029. pfultz2 added a comment. Rename flag to `allow-enabling-alpha-checks` and removed the option from the clang-tidy file. https://reviews.llvm.org/D46159 Files: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.cpp clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions

[PATCH] D33844: [clang-tidy] terminating continue check

alexfh requested changes to this revision. alexfh added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. There are still outstanding comments. https://reviews.llvm.org/D33844 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://li

[PATCH] D36610: [Tooling] Add option to getFullyQualifiedName using a custom PritingPolicy

saugustine added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D36610#1083952, @mikhail.ramalho wrote: > Ping. Given that richard smith is the only non-approver, and that he hasn't responded, and that I contributed this code, I'm going to make an executive decision and say that this is OK to submit.

[PATCH] D40937: [clang-tidy] Infinite loop checker

alexfh requested changes to this revision. alexfh added inline comments. This revision now requires changes to proceed. Comment at: clang-tidy/bugprone/InfiniteLoopCheck.h:37 +private: + bool updateSequence(Stmt *FunctionBody, ASTContext &ASTCtx); + const Stmt *PrevFunctionBody

[PATCH] D46115: [ASTImporter] properly import SrcLoc of Attr

r.stahl added a comment. Maybe this is a user error of CrossTU, but it seemed to import a FuncDecl with attributes, causing the imported FuncDecl to have all those attributes twice. That's why I thought merging would maybe make sense. However I did not encounter any issue with the duplicate att

[clang-tools-extra] r331461 - Added trailing periods.

Author: alexfh Date: Thu May 3 09:01:49 2018 New Revision: 331461 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331461&view=rev Log: Added trailing periods. Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst URL: http://llvm.org/v

[clang-tools-extra] r331460 - Add a trailing period in release notes.

Author: alexfh Date: Thu May 3 08:59:39 2018 New Revision: 331460 URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=331460&view=rev Log: Add a trailing period in release notes. Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_check.py Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/add_new_chec

  1   2   >