On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 2:31 AM Gregory Farnum wrote:
> There are versioning and dependency issues (both of packages, and compiler
> toolchain pieces) which mean that the existing reef releases do not build
> on Debian. Our upstream support for Debian has always been inconsistent
>
i think, to b
That's really useful to know, thanks Daniel.
On 15/11/2023 19:07, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 11/15/23 19:52, Daniel Baumann wrote:
for 18.2.0, there's only one trivial thing needed:
https://git.progress-linux.org/packages/graograman-backports-extras/ceph/commit/?id=ed59c69244ec7b81ec08f7a2d1a1f0a
On 11/15/23 19:52, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> for 18.2.0, there's only one trivial thing needed:
> https://git.progress-linux.org/packages/graograman-backports-extras/ceph/commit/?id=ed59c69244ec7b81ec08f7a2d1a1f0a90e765de0
or, for mainline inclusion, an alternative depends would be suitable too:
Bu
On 11/15/23 19:31, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> There are versioning and dependency issues
for 18.2.0, there's only one trivial thing needed:
https://git.progress-linux.org/packages/graograman-backports-extras/ceph/commit/?id=ed59c69244ec7b81ec08f7a2d1a1f0a90e765de0
then, the packages build fine/as-i
There are versioning and dependency issues (both of packages, and compiler
toolchain pieces) which mean that the existing reef releases do not build
on Debian. Our upstream support for Debian has always been inconsistent
because we don’t have anybody dedicated or involved enough in both Debian
and
On 13/11/2023 16:28, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 11/13/23 17:14, Luke Hall wrote:
How is it that Proxmox were able to release Debian12 packages for Quincy
quite some time ago?
because you can, as always, just (re-)build the package yourself.
I guess I was just trying to point out that there see
On 11/13/23 17:14, Luke Hall wrote:
> How is it that Proxmox were able to release Debian12 packages for Quincy
> quite some time ago?
because you can, as always, just (re-)build the package yourself.
> My understanding is that they change almost nothing in their packages
> and just roll them to f
How is it that Proxmox were able to release Debian12 packages for Quincy
quite some time ago?
https://download.proxmox.com/debian/ceph-quincy/dists/
My understanding is that they change almost nothing in their packages
and just roll them to fit with their naming schema etc.
On 01/11/2023 07:
Hi,
On 13/11/2023 10:42, Chris Palmer wrote:
And another big +1 for debian12 reef from us. We're unable to upgrade to
either debian12 or reef.
I've been keeping an eye on the debian12 bug, and it looks as though it
might be fixed if you start from the latest repo release.
My expectation is th
e:
+1 for a debian 12 release.
We are also looking forward to it.
Thanks for your efforts.
BR
Wolfgang
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matthew Darwin
Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2023 18:36
An: ceph-users@ceph.io
Betreff: [ceph-users] Re: Debian 12 support
We are still waiting on
+1 for a debian 12 release.
We are also looking forward to it.
Thanks for your efforts.
BR
Wolfgang
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matthew Darwin
Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. November 2023 18:36
An: ceph-users@ceph.io
Betreff: [ceph-users] Re: Debian 12 support
We are still waiting on debian
We are still waiting on debian 12 support. Currently our ceph is
stuck on debian 11 due to lack of debian 12 releases.
On 2023-11-01 03:23, nessero karuzo wrote:
Hi to all ceph community. I have a question about Debian 12 support for ceph
17. I didn’t find repo for that release athttps://down
12 matches
Mail list logo
