RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so maybe someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? Since it is mainly a port it isn't that much to highlight, but what *is* in and what is *not in* is the main thing imo.

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Many thanks for your sustained, herculian effort Boudewijn!

Jenkins-kde-ci: calligra master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 185 - Still Unstable!

2017-01-05 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/calligra%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/185/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 08:33:29 + Build duration: 38 min CHANGE SET Revision 8d2383d29beaaad1ebb0b9de2b73589a8b964cdc b

Re: Version stuff in CMakeLists.txt

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 08:59, Dag wrote: > Had a closer look at this, and there is some cmake logic when generating > calligraversion.h: > Any 3.0.x unstable (alpha/beta/rc) will get version 2.99.x. (3.1.x will be > 3.0.x, etc) > Afaics this scheme only works when a minor version is increased, e.g

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 10:03, Dag wrote: > Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: > >> I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so maybe >> someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? >> > Since it is mainly a port it isn't that much to highlight, but what *i

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape just made a > release that highlights a port to GTK+3 as an important news. Um... The version inkscape just released isn

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape just made a > > release that highlights a port to GTK+3 as an

NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL ! NO MAİL !

2017-01-05 Thread Ali Demir
2017-01-05 12:12 GMT+02:00 Jaroslaw Staniek : > > > On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> >> > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will >> > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape jus

Re: Version stuff in CMakeLists.txt

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-01-05 10:50: On 5 January 2017 at 08:59, Dag wrote: Had a closer look at this, and there is some cmake logic when generating calligraversion.h: Any 3.0.x unstable (alpha/beta/rc) will get version 2.99.x. (3.1.x will be 3.0.x, etc) Afaics this scheme only works w

Re: Version stuff in CMakeLists.txt

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 11:12, Dag wrote: > Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-01-05 10:50: > >> On 5 January 2017 at 08:59, Dag wrote: >> >> Had a closer look at this, and there is some cmake logic when >>> generating calligraversion.h: >>> Any 3.0.x unstable (alpha/beta/rc) will get version 2.99.x.

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > > > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape just

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 11:32, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > > > > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > > > >

Re: Version stuff in CMakeLists.txt

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-01-05 11:29: On 5 January 2017 at 11:12, Dag wrote: Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-01-05 10:50: On 5 January 2017 at 08:59, Dag wrote: Had a closer look at this, and there is some cmake logic when generating calligraversion.h: Any 3.0.x unstable (alpha/beta/r

Re: Version stuff in CMakeLists.txt

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Ahh, just dawned on me where I went wrong. A bug fix release will *always* be stable so... no problem. Thanks for your patience, Jaroslaw. Dag skrev den 2017-01-05 11:43: Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-01-05 11:29: On 5 January 2017 at 11:12, Dag wrote: Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2017-01-0

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Camilla Boemann
Sure but I did say in my draft that we are porting and that it sets a bright new future – but really for the average user it doesn’t matter much what kind of tools we use – it’s what it means for the user that is important From: calligra-devel [mailto:calligra-devel-boun...@kde.org] On Behalf

Jenkins-kde-ci: calligra master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 186 - Still Unstable!

2017-01-05 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/calligra%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/186/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:16:08 + Build duration: 47 min CHANGE SET Revision 3a3ee7863b65313f573593bf868584f829b725f2 b

Jenkins-kde-ci: calligra master kf5-qt5 » Linux,gcc - Build # 187 - Failure!

2017-01-05 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD FAILURE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/calligra%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/187/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 12:04:16 + Build duration: 22 min CHANGE SET Revision c769476b16068a82c20e195134e7c32ae7c7a081 by

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 12:25, Camilla Boemann wrote: > Sure but I did say in my draft that we are porting and that it sets a > bright new future – but really for the average user it doesn’t matter much > what kind of tools we use – it’s what it means for the user that is > important > ​Yes, I thin