Release Blockers for Krita 2.8

Hi! Today we were triaging bugs in Krita for the release. Link to the original file: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g1aTyapuFmKy7t8IRbR7PKQOOmiU-W0kuoSIWaiR0pk/edit# Here is the list with which we ended-up. General Blockers: Bug 325659 - All s

Review Request 115352: Fix the Stroke and Shape Id of the Pencil Tool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115352/ --- Review request for Calligra. Repository: calligra Description ---

Re: Review Request 115352: Fix the Stroke and Shape Id of the Pencil Tool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115352/#review48464 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Camilla Boemann On Jan. 28, 2014, 1:03

Re: Release Blockers for Krita 2.8

hi ! good list ; About bug 330400 on "would be also nice to fix" list; ( https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330400 ) , the fix is in the bug report ( not a patch , just written ). I would like to add ( if possible ) to the list , those bugs affecting brushes and rendering : Bug 329026 "Weird br

Re: Review Request 115352: Fix the Stroke and Shape Id of the Pencil Tool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115352/ --- (Updated Jan. 28, 2014, 1:37 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 115352: Fix the Stroke and Shape Id of the Pencil Tool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115352/#review48466 --- This review has been submitted with commit e9bca7e1276b639213

Re: Release Blockers for Krita 2.8

We're going to add Calligra 2.8 package to the KDE 4.12 release on KDE-windows installer ... Specifically for Krita it would be nice to have https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115110/ reviewed, as it allows the MinGW build (this is currently being applied as a patch for 2.8-beta1 tarball on emerge).

Re: Release Blockers for Krita 2.8

Hi, Andrius! This patch is looks ok for me, but I'd really like Friedrich to look at it (I'm not good at cmake syntax myself). I'll try to ask him tonight and then we'll shipit the patch :) On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Andrius da Costa Ribas < andrius...@gmail.com> wrote: > We're going to a