shear/skew transformation errors

2012-04-05 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, tl;dr There are unclear differences in skew transform handling in ODF and SVG, at least loading SVG with skewX/Y is broken. Expert input needed. I got pointed to the fact that there are problems with loading SVG files with shearing transformations, e.g. seen with the coords-trans-03-t from

Re: shear/skew transformation errors

2012-04-05 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 15:45:42 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau: > Hi, > > tl;dr There are unclear differences in skew transform handling in ODF and > SVG, at least loading SVG with skewX/Y is broken. Expert input needed. > > > I got pointed to the fact that there are problems with loadi

is calligra 2.4 good to go ?

2012-04-05 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
Hi, Does anyone has any objection to the tagging of 2.4.0 tomorrow ? -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel

Re: is calligra 2.4 good to go ?

2012-04-05 Thread C. Boemann
On Thursday 05 April 2012 18:34:55 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone has any objection to the tagging of 2.4.0 tomorrow ? Well, No but I'll commit some fixes tonight ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.

Re: is calligra 2.4 good to go ?

2012-04-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 05 April 2012 Apr, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone has any objection to the tagging of 2.4.0 tomorrow ? > I've disabled a few things for windows... maybe some more tomorrow morning. But yes, good to go! -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.

Re: is calligra 2.4 good to go ?

2012-04-05 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Thursday 05 Apr 2012, C. Boemann wrote: > On Thursday 05 April 2012 18:34:55 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone has any objection to the tagging of 2.4.0 tomorrow ? > > Well, No but I'll commit some fixes tonight Would it be better wait an extra week ? -- Cyrille Berger

Re: is calligra 2.4 good to go ?

2012-04-05 Thread C. Boemann
On Thursday 05 April 2012 19:20:05 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Thursday 05 Apr 2012, C. Boemann wrote: > > On Thursday 05 April 2012 18:34:55 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Does anyone has any objection to the tagging of 2.4.0 tomorrow ? > > > > Well, No but I'll commit so

Re: is calligra 2.4 good to go ?

2012-04-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thursday 05 April 2012 Apr, C. Boemann wrote: > On Thursday 05 April 2012 19:20:05 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > On Thursday 05 Apr 2012, C. Boemann wrote: > > > On Thursday 05 April 2012 18:34:55 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Does anyone has any objection to the tag

commits to master

2012-04-05 Thread C. Boemann
Hi In Berlin last year we agreed that we would move to a 4 month release cycle and in order to do that we promised ourselves we would keep master in a releasable state only merging things when it was ready to be released. I don't think we have taken that to heart yet. Master is currently broken