[calligra/calligra/2.9] /: Fix some unittests

2015-02-24 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Git commit 6a89e5345da2217575fabaa78bcc321d35726403 by Boudewijn Rempt. Committed on 24/02/2015 at 15:23. Pushed by rempt into branch 'calligra/2.9'. Fix some unittests CCMAIL:calligra-devel@kde.org CCMAIL:kimages...@kde.org See below for the breakdown. Most of the remaining fa

failing unittests

2012-11-20 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Hi, Without wanting to engage in finger-pointing... Here's an overview of unittests that fail in master and in 2.6, with a note who I think is responsible for fixing them, if I could figure that out. Having the Jenkins shout UNSTABLE at us every build is unpleasant, so let's try t

Failed unittests

2012-05-24 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
This I don't get... The build bot tells us there are only 13 failing tests, and that number has been stable for a long time (too long...) But if I run the tests myself I get this The following tests FAILED: 2 - words-part-TestRdf (Failed) 3 - words-part-TestKoBookmark (Faile

Re: breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-07 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Monday 07 March 2011, C. Boemann wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2011 06:40:15 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > _If_ we want to be able to release master as a reasonably stable snapshot, > > we really have to be better about our unittests. Even if the unittests

Re: breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-07 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Monday 07 March 2011, Arjen Hiemstra wrote: > On Monday 07 March 2011 06:40:15 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > 183 - libs-widgets-zoomhandler_test (Failed) > > > > Arjen: you were going to fix this test -- please do that today! > > > > Yeah, I fixed it today though I'm not entirely happy w

Re: breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-07 Thread Arjen Hiemstra
On Monday 07 March 2011 06:40:15 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > 183 - libs-widgets-zoomhandler_test (Failed) > > Arjen: you were going to fix this test -- please do that today! > Yeah, I fixed it today though I'm not entirely happy with the solution. There is a zoomcontroller_test where I wan

Re: breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-07 Thread C. Boemann
On Monday 07 March 2011 06:40:15 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Hi, > > _If_ we want to be able to release master as a reasonably stable snapshot, > we really have to be better about our unittests. Even if the unittests > test something that is being refactored anyway in a branch, we

Re: breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-07 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
And lets not forget: libs-komain-TestActionTest Random failures, had been happening for as long as this test has existed. -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calli

Re: breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-07 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Monday 07 March 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > I'm not sure how I can figure out who committed the changes that broke the > test -- Cyrille, do you know how I can figure that out? The problem is that most of those failures happened while the buildbot configuration was not stable. And some of t

breaking unittests is BAD

2011-03-06 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Hi, _If_ we want to be able to release master as a reasonably stable snapshot, we really have to be better about our unittests. Even if the unittests test something that is being refactored anyway in a branch, we should _NOT_ break those tests. Currently we have the following failures

Re: unittests

2011-02-08 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Monday 07 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > On Monday 07 February 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > Hm... Maybe the project http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=KOffice > > should be renamed... > > I have set it up here: http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=Calligra and > ask for th

Re: unittests

2011-02-08 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Tuesday 08 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Actually, the test have fails to build and run, for a week. I have put a > workaround in the test script, so hopefully next time someone push a > commit, we will get fresh results :) And here are the fresh results as promised: http://my.cda

Re: unittests

2011-02-08 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tuesday 08 February 2011, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote: > Actually, the test have fails to build and run, for a week. I have put a > workaround in the test script, so hopefully next time someone push a commit, > we will get fresh results :) Cool! I've got most of this week to work on our autobu

Re: unittests

2011-02-08 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
Actually, the test have fails to build and run, for a week. I have put a workaround in the test script, so hopefully next time someone push a commit, we will get fresh results :) -- Cyrille Berger Skott ___ calligra-devel mailing list calligra-devel@k

Re: unittests

2011-02-07 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
On Monday, February 07, 2011 13:08:17 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > 218 - libs-flake-TestShapeGroupCommand (Failed) I fixed this test. The tests where totally wrong no idea if that ever could have worked. Thorsten ___ calligra-devel mailing list cal

Re: unittests

2011-02-07 Thread Dag Andersen
Mandag 07 februar 2011 13:08:17 skrev Boudewijn Rempt: > Hm... Maybe the project http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=KOffice > should be renamed... But worse, we have a lot of failing tests there. A > local run shows: Not quite what I see here. Could you mail me the logfile? > > > The following

Re: unittests

2011-02-07 Thread Cyrille Berger Skott
On Monday 07 February 2011, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Hm... Maybe the project http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=KOffice > should be renamed... I have set it up here: http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=Calligra and ask for the upgrade to a new plan so that the continuous build can be run the

unittests

2011-02-07 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Hm... Maybe the project http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=KOffice should be renamed... But worse, we have a lot of failing tests there. A local run shows: The following tests FAILED: 7 - words-part-frame-TestDocumentLayout (Failed) 10 - words-part-TestRdf (Failed)