Then leave it blank indeed and wait for 3.1 branch to happen. Nearly there :)
Jonathan
On 31 August 2017 at 14:20, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 31 August 2017 at 14:58, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>> kexi has no stable translations. I think it should be set to use the
>> 3.0 branch? Is that rig
On 31 August 2017 at 14:58, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> kexi has no stable translations. I think it should be set to use the
> 3.0 branch? Is that right?
Jonathan,
Today yes, it could. Or: if we could we'd have this done already. But
dependencies we develop (kdb, kproperty, kreport) are not marke
kexi has no stable translations. I think it should be set to use the
3.0 branch? Is that right?
Jonathan
