On 23 June 2012 14:20, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 23 June 2012 14:17, C. Boemann wrote:
>> Fine with me
>>
>> and regarding the shapes, I was going to make exceptions for formula and
>> chart. And I'm insisting on Textshape under Words as it's so closely related,
>> and for the same reason conn
On 23 June 2012 14:17, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2012 14:12:27 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 22 June 2012 14:16, C. Boemann wrote:
>> > I've updated the css according to my comments and made lists for every
>> > application / major shape
>> >
>> > As far as I'm concerned we are good
On Saturday 23 June 2012 14:12:27 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 22 June 2012 14:16, C. Boemann wrote:
> > I've updated the css according to my comments and made lists for every
> > application / major shape
> >
> > As far as I'm concerned we are good to go, and I will start populating
> > the Word
On 22 June 2012 14:16, C. Boemann wrote:
> I've updated the css according to my comments and made lists for every
> application / major shape
>
> As far as I'm concerned we are good to go, and I will start populating the
> Words list tonight.
I have usability suggestion: move the git parameter (n
On 21 June 2012 18:23, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2012 12:31:57 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>> On 20 June 2012 08:53, C. Boemann wrote:
>> > No No. We don't need filtering or anything. Just an update version of
>> > what we had. Updated meaning that it handles the extra column for
>> >
On Thursday 21 June 2012 18:23:36 C. Boemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2012 12:31:57 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> > On 20 June 2012 08:53, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > No No. We don't need filtering or anything. Just an update version of
> > > what we had. Updated meaning that it handles the extra col
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 12:31:57 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 08:53, C. Boemann wrote:
> > No No. We don't need filtering or anything. Just an update version of
> > what we had. Updated meaning that it handles the extra column for
> > version and a narrow column (1 char) for link to
On 20 June 2012 12:31, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 08:53, C. Boemann wrote:
>
>> No No. We don't need filtering or anything. Just an update version of what we
>> had. Updated meaning that it handles the extra column for version and a
>> narrow
>> column (1 char) for link to git.
>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:31:57 +0200, Jaroslaw Staniek
wrote:
> - MOST VISIBLE CHANGE: added Component column, so all items can be now
> put in a single table what gives ability to sort the table globally
> (useful to get version/status plans overview)
>
> Please give you feedback :)
Looks good.
I
On 20 June 2012 08:53, C. Boemann wrote:
> No No. We don't need filtering or anything. Just an update version of what we
> had. Updated meaning that it handles the extra column for version and a narrow
> column (1 char) for link to git.
OK, so here's my proposed solution:
http://community.kde.o
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 08:23:29 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 22:52, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:43:31 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> >> On Sunday 17 Jun 2012, C. Boemann wrote:
> >> > Now while in theory I like it, I also dislike that the height of each
> >> > e
On 19 June 2012 22:52, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:43:31 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> On Sunday 17 Jun 2012, C. Boemann wrote:
>> > Now while in theory I like it, I also dislike that the height of each
>> > entry thus will grow to more than one line of text.
>>
>> That said th
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:43:31 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> On Sunday 17 Jun 2012, C. Boemann wrote:
> > Now while in theory I like it, I also dislike that the height of each
> > entry thus will grow to more than one line of text.
>
> That said the branch could be simply replaced by just the li
On Monday 18 Jun 2012, Markus wrote:
> Why not use Bugzilla as Martin Gräßlin explained in his "bko" series?
While in theory it sounds better, and I personnaly use a task tracker in other
projects for that purpose as well. I have the feeling that bugzilla is not
suited for the task. Even the bug
On Sunday 17 Jun 2012, C. Boemann wrote:
> Now while in theory I like it, I also dislike that the height of each entry
> thus will grow to more than one line of text.
That said the branch could be simply replaced by just the link. I just did the
change on the webpage and it now takes one line. And
Am Sonntag 17 Juni 2012, 12:51:54 schrieb C. Boemann:
> And since I use it for Words, lib, plugins and the features I work on, I
> don't want to carry around a lot of cruft, making it hard to use this page
> in a fast efficient manner.
Why not use Bugzilla as Martin Gräßlin explained in his "bko"
Hi
We have the http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.5/Feature_Plan
and Cyrille has suggested that we move to not have one page per version, but
instead have an extra column for the targeted version.
His suggestion also has a column for showing a possible public branch.
Here is the link
17 matches
Mail list logo
