On Friday, April 29, 2011 14:41:36 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have an opinion on the subject, however, we have to reach a
> conclusion *soon*. As mentioned in an earlier mail, I can still tag right
> before the text layout merge, however, the later I do that, the more
> useless
Hi,
I don't have an opinion on the subject, however, we have to reach a conclusion
*soon*. As mentioned in an earlier mail, I can still tag right before the text
layout merge, however, the later I do that, the more useless the release is.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
Ursprüngliche Nachricht -
Betreff: Re: The snapshot and the new text layout code.
Von: t...@exit0.net
Datum: Do, 28.04.2011, 11:58
An: i...@lysator.liu.se
"Calligra Suite developers and users mailing
> Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear
> people
> expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be merged
> before the snapshot. This worries me.
No need to worry.
I totally agree that the text layout change is a very important change.
Also I ha
I have updated the schedule to reflect this delay:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.4/Release_Plan#2.3.71
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
I also agree. If it really is a matter of days rather than weeks. It really
would be a shame to miss one of the biggest and most noticeable change in
words. Not to mention missing the whole application, which would in my
opinion be a big problem PR wise.
Pierre
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM, E
On Thursday 28 April 2011 10:57:55 Inge Wallin wrote:
> Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear
> people expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be
> merged before the snapshot. This worries me.
>
> We do the snapshots for two reasons:
>
> 1.
Hi,
2011/4/28 Inge Wallin :
> Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear people
> expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be merged
> before the snapshot. This worries me.
>
> We do the snapshots for two reasons:
>
> 1. To get feedback on what we
Today is officially the tagging for 2.4 or 3.0 snapshot 1. And I hear people
expressing the opinion that the new text layout code should not be merged
before the snapshot. This worries me.
We do the snapshots for two reasons:
1. To get feedback on what we have now.
2. To show some activity an
