>
> I'm sorry, but I actually see no other way than what I did, but I do
> apologize
> for not having waited longer.
>
>
Although I think that the new text layout should be included in the
snapshot, I do agree with Thorsten here that the branch should have got a
better review process.
Basically say
On Thursday 28 April 2011 16:41:30 Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thursday, April 28, 2011 13:26:22 C. Boemann wrote:
> > The text layout branch has landed in master
> >
> > Please continue work in master or your own branches from now on!
>
> I have to say that I'm a bit disappointed o
On Thursday 28 April 2011, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> Merging such a big change only 2.5 hours there was a mail about what
> people think is not the nicest thing to do.
On a side note, if the result of the other conversation was to tag the
snapshot before the text layout, I can still tag using a
Hello,
On Thursday, April 28, 2011 13:26:22 C. Boemann wrote:
> The text layout branch has landed in master
>
> Please continue work in master or your own branches from now on!
>
I have to say that I'm a bit disappointed on how this thing went. I think for
features big as that and which affect
The text layout branch has landed in master
Please continue work in master or your own branches from now on!
Best regards
Casper
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/calligra-devel
