On Friday August 25 2017 07:33:43 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi,
>> Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
>> use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
>> is due to short-hashes which are used by Git/Reviewboard in diffs now
>> having collision
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:20 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Friday August 25 2017 07:33:43 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Rene,
>
>>> Note that due to how Reviewboard stores diffs and reproduces them for
>>> use, some reviews may have decayed and may no longer be readable. This
>>> is due to s
On 25/08/2017 5:41 AM, "Albert Astals Cid" wrote:
El dijous, 24 d’agost de 2017, a les 21:07:49 CEST, Ben Cooksley va
escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
> Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
> of code reviews.
El dijous, 24 d’agost de 2017, a les 21:07:49 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
> Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
> of code reviews.
>
> Phase 1: Commences September 2: All repositori
Hi all,
The following is Sysadmin's suggested plan for the retirement of
Reviewboard now that Phabricator is fully up and running for hosting
of code reviews.
Phase 1: Commences September 2: All repositories are closed for
accepting new reviews on Reviewboard. A notice is added to the top of
the