Two weeks ago or so Inge put it nicely on #calligra IMHO:
There are 3 phases of the port:
1. Initial port of buildsystem (done now, thanks Boud)
2. Readding everything to build (minimal port, using kdelibs4support)
3. Porting away from kdelibs4support and other deprecated stuff
So seems in the
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> Nice thanks.
> I see 28% of changes are non-whitespace.
> Forcing {} for if/else is good.
>
> Could we please exclude dirs that contain forked code that would be
> compared to external copies?
> One comes to my mind: kexi/migration/mdb/src
Please directories that should be excluded to a list at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jhq6oXuXKvTilJhcoS6FVKO7yYRu2yCgBS9ojhc2QRU/edit?usp=sharing
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
Nice thanks.
I see 28% of changes are non-whitespace.
Forcing {} for if/else is good.
Could we p
Nice thanks.
I see 28% of changes are non-whitespace.
Forcing {} for if/else is good.
Could we please exclude dirs that contain forked code that would be
compared to external copies?
One comes to my mind: kexi/migration/mdb/src/mdbtools/. Anything else?
For the future I'd use the tool as a local
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Other than that it seems to me no one now strongly rejects
* astyle-kdelibs being applied to all of Calligra code
* doing that in master
* right before the port starts.
Does this sounds like something that will make most people happy and least
On 3 March 2015 at 23:18, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 22:49:54 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> On 27 February 2015 at 01:36, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> wrote:
>> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:39:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> >> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01
Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 19:03:30 schrieb Thorsten Zachmann:
> Hello,
>
> > I say it should be done now, and be done to 2.9 too
> >
> > And I almost don't think maintainers should be able to say no. The long
> > term goal of having a clean codebase is more important than short term
> > issue
Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 22:49:54 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 27 February 2015 at 01:36, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:39:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> >> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Am Dienstag, 2
On 27 February 2015 at 01:36, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:39:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 12:18:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> >> On 24 February 2015 at
On 27 February 2015 at 19:03, Thorsten Zachmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>>
>> I say it should be done now, and be done to 2.9 too
>>
>> And I almost don't think maintainers should be able to say no. The long term
>> goal of having a clean codebase is more important than short term issue
>> with git blam
Hello,
>
> I say it should be done now, and be done to 2.9 too
>
> And I almost don't think maintainers should be able to say no. The long term
> goal of having a clean codebase is more important than short term issue
> with git blame (have a separate permanent checkout before this revision
> wh
On Friday 27 February 2015 01:21:56 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 15:41:33 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > My 2 cents :)
> > >
> > > 1) astyle
> > >
> > > Last time astyle was applied to Krita code (
On 2015-02-27 01:21, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
If not using astyle on calligra/2.9, then it should be better only
applied at
the end of the porting, close to 3.0 release, to not complicate forward
porting of commits to calligra/2.9. Would you agree?
Perhaps also even only after 3.0, during
Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:39:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 12:18:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> >> On 24 February 2015 at 11:24, Mario Fux wrote:
> >> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 08.51:
Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 08:33:25 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> >> As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step,
> >> but I'm not su
Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 15:41:33 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Dmitry Kazakov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > My 2 cents :)
> >
> > 1) astyle
> >
> > Last time astyle was applied to Krita code (something around 2010-2011, it
> > was applied partially?) I really didn't like the re
Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:21:14 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> >> * rename all krita files to the calligra standard. (cc -> cpp, underscore
> >> -> CamelCaps)
> >>
> >> *
Thanks,
Added
https://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/3.0/Porting_Plan#Patches_to_merge
Please update.
@Roman - your 2 patches are there
@Wojtek - I'll review your patch very soon, let's get it pushed on time
On 25 February 2015 at 01:03, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Started to docum
On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 12:18:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> On 24 February 2015 at 11:24, Mario Fux wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 08.51:56 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> >> On 24 February 2015 at 03:55, Friedrich
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step,
but I'm not sure what the right moment or place is. It might even
something to do in the 2.9 branch aft
On Wednesday 25 February 2015 01:01:57 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> > As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step,
> > but I'm not sure what the right moment or place is. It might even
> > something
Started to document all the things written on
https://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/3.0/Porting_Plan
Please review, update & comment also there :)
Cheers
Friedrich
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.or
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 09:47:41 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step,
> but I'm not sure what the right moment or place is. It might even
> something to do in the 2.9 branch after tagging...
>
> * replace all header guards with
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 08:51:56 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 24 February 2015 at 03:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> > 4. Remove these subdirs:
> >3rdparty/kdchart/
> >3rdparty/kdchartpatches/
> >3rdparty/kdgantt/
> >3rdparty/kdganttpatches/
> >libs/koproperty/
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 12:18:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 24 February 2015 at 11:24, Mario Fux wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 08.51:56 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> >> On 24 February 2015 at 03:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> >> > To not have people step on each other toes an
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015, 08.51:56 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 24 February 2015 at 03:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
Morning
[snip]
> > Reasoning:
> > --
> > Calligra has over 4 M lines (claims openhub.net, not counted myself), so
> > expecting one person to do all the ini
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Tomas Mecir wrote:
2015-02-24 3:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau :
PS: Tomas, you had done some initial buildsystem porting experients,
right?
Would you be willing to be the person to do the initial porting steps?
Hmm, do we have more Tomases? Because I d
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
On 24 February 2015 at 09:47, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Sorry, I have to interline in Jaroslaw's answer -- apparently I lost my
copies of the original mail, or they never arrived :-(
As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up s
On 24 February 2015 at 09:47, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Sorry, I have to interline in Jaroslaw's answer -- apparently I lost my
> copies of the original mail, or they never arrived :-(
>
> As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step,
> but I'm not sure what the right mo
Sorry, I have to interline in Jaroslaw's answer -- apparently I lost my
copies of the original mail, or they never arrived :-(
As a sidenote, I also want to take the opportunity to do a clean-up step,
but I'm not sure what the right moment or place is. It might even
something to do in the 2.9
30 matches
Mail list logo
