2015-03-06 20:05 GMT+01:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau :
> Am Freitag, 6. März 2015, 08:07:07 schrieb Elvis Stansvik:
> > 2015-03-06 1:16 GMT+01:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > so I spent quite some time scanning the sources, below is what I found
> as
> > > TODO.
> > >
> > > So t
Am Freitag, 6. März 2015, 07:50:34 schrieb C. Boemann:
> > filters/words/msword-odf/wv2
> > from what I heard this can be considered a fork already.
> > but for now I would still treat it as 3rdparty lib,
> > until the further fate of this lib has been discussed
> > -> filters/words/msword-odf/3rdp
Am Freitag, 6. März 2015, 08:07:07 schrieb Elvis Stansvik:
> 2015-03-06 1:16 GMT+01:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau :
> > Hi,
> >
> > so I spent quite some time scanning the sources, below is what I found as
> > TODO.
> >
> > So the idea still is: put 3rd-party code into a subdir "3rdparty" and put
>
On 6 March 2015 at 01:16, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so I spent quite some time scanning the sources, below is what I found as
> TODO.
>
> So the idea still is: put 3rd-party code into a subdir "3rdparty" and put
> generated and committed code into a subdir "generated", either loca
2015-03-06 1:16 GMT+01:00 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau :
> Hi,
>
> so I spent quite some time scanning the sources, below is what I found as
> TODO.
>
> So the idea still is: put 3rd-party code into a subdir "3rdparty" and put
> generated and committed code into a subdir "generated", either locally or
> filters/words/msword-odf/wv2
> from what I heard this can be considered a fork already.
> but for now I would still treat it as 3rdparty lib,
> until the further fate of this lib has been discussed
> -> filters/words/msword-odf/3rdparty/wv2
it's very much a fork or rather a takeover and will rema
Hi,
so I spent quite some time scanning the sources, below is what I found as
TODO.
So the idea still is: put 3rd-party code into a subdir "3rdparty" and put
generated and committed code into a subdir "generated", either locally or
globally. This allows automatted handling of such code files i
Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2015, 17:22:53 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:
> Hi,
>
> You've got a good point... I think we need a list to start with.
Yes. A start of the list would be all the things noted in the scratchpad about
using astyle-kdelibs.
Have not yet invested my little spare time in coming up
Hi,
You've got a good point... I think we need a list to start with. One
problem I already see is g'mic, which is 3rd party, but not a library and
so is included directly in the g'mic plugin subtree. But I guess we could
and should rename the directory it's in to 3rd party.
On Thu, 5 Mar 201
