Onsdag den 25. april 2012 09:10:14 Adam Pigg skrev:
you have identified the same issue i did 2 years ago :-)
I can't check right now, but i think the existing odt generator arranges the
items in a table.
True
Perhaps there is space for both types of output?
Yes, but when to use which? Ahh,
you have identified the same issue i did 2 years ago :-)
I can't check right now, but i think the existing odt generator arranges
the items in a table. Perhaps there is space for both types of output? The
html generator works like this..there are 2, one that outputs as a table,
the other outputs
Søndag den 22. april 2012 16:35:34 Adam Pigg skrev:
> Dag
>
> In Plan, i see you have your own ODT renderer. It appears to be more
> featureful than the one in libs/koreport, so perhaps you could move it
> there?
Done, branch: report_odt_danders
> Can you post a sample of what kind of ODT it prod
On Monday 23 April 2012 09:15:56 Dag wrote:
> Søndag den 22. april 2012 16:35:34 Adam Pigg skrev:
> > Dag
> >
> > In Plan, i see you have your own ODT renderer.
>
> Yes, I tried to make something that words could cope with and that at
> least looked similar to the generated report.
>
> > It app
Søndag den 22. april 2012 16:35:34 Adam Pigg skrev:
> Dag
>
> In Plan, i see you have your own ODT renderer.
Yes, I tried to make something that words could cope with and that at least
looked similar to the generated report.
> It appears to be more
> featureful than the one in libs/koreport, so
