On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:55:37 +0200, Inge Wallin
wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 20:01:48 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
>> I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
>>
>> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
>>
>> Don't fill that just yet :)
>>
>> Is that ok with you ? A
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 20:01:48 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
>
> Don't fill that just yet :)
>
> Is that ok with you ? And if there is someone with some wikimedia-fu who
> want to make
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 20:01:48 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
>
> http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
>
> Don't fill that just yet :)
>
> Is that ok with you ? And if there is someone with some wikimedia-fu who
> want to make it
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
Don't fill that just yet :)
Is that ok with you ? And if there is someone with some wikimedia-fu who want
to make it pretty, that would be app
I have started a page with the new feature plan style:
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Feature_Plan
Don't fill that just yet :)
Is that ok with you ? And if there is someone with some wikimedia-fu who want
to make it pretty, that would be appreciated.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 Apr, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> I wonder if the current format of features plan should be kept. The reason
> we use the current format is that we had soft freezes (when no new features
> are started), so we needed a way to keep track on what needed to be
> finished.
>
> To me
On 17 April 2012 16:44, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> I wonder if the current format of features plan should be kept. The reason
> we use the current format is that we had soft freezes (when no new features
> are started), so we needed a way to keep track on what needed to be
> finished.
>
> To me it wo
I wonder if the current format of features plan should be kept. The reason
we use the current format is that we had soft freezes (when no new features
are started), so we needed a way to keep track on what needed to be
finished.
To me it would seem better to have a singe page, with the following
i
