Hi Ganesh
thanks for the analysis. I guess I'm partly at fault then. I blame git too ;)
I'll try and see if i can restore it to working order
big thanks
Casper
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 19:10:03 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote:
> Casper,
>
> I just took a quick look at this and here is the analysis
>
Casper,
I just took a quick look at this and here is the analysis
- A vast majority ( all ? ) of the test failures are due to failures
in saving delete changes.
- According to the original code, deleted fragments are inserted into
the document before a save and removed after a save.
- The code to
Hi Ganesh
As soon as possible. We have seen a lot of issues with the changetracking to
the point of us regretting that we have merged it into master. It's too late
to revert it now, but getting things fixed has a very high priority.
best regards
Casper
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 17:38:20 Ganesh
Casper,
I have been on travel on haven't had a chance to look ( also the
situation is going to be same for the next 10 days ). If you could
give me a target date by when you would like to see this fixed, I will
squeeze some time to fix this.
Thanks,
Ganesh
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:03 PM, C. Boe
Hi
is this still an issue and, Ganesh have you had a chance to look.
best regards
Casper
On Monday 16 May 2011 18:50:45 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looks like saving of delete changes in broken ( and probably not
> related to the random failures ). Will take a look at it.
> Can this wai
Hi,
Looks like saving of delete changes in broken ( and probably not
related to the random failures ). Will take a look at it.
Can this wait till the weekend for a fix ?
Thanks,
Ganesh
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Cyrille Berger Skott
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I now get "permanent" failure in the un
Hi,
I now get "permanent" failure in the unit test:
http://my.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=6063659&build=187759
It seems it happened after the merge of the new text layout.
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-devel@kde.o
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 21:00:45 Ganesh Paramasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott
>
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 April 2011, you wrote:
> >> Though I have not been able to re-produce the problem here, I think I
> >> have fixed the problem ( More than one unit-
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Cyrille Berger Skott
wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2011, you wrote:
>> Though I have not been able to re-produce the problem here, I think I
>> have fixed the problem ( More than one unit-test were having the same
>> test-name and at a previous occasion this was ca
On Tuesday 12 April 2011, you wrote:
> Though I have not been able to re-produce the problem here, I think I
> have fixed the problem ( More than one unit-test were having the same
> test-name and at a previous occasion this was causing the unit-tests
> to behave strangely ).
>
> Please let me kn
Hi,
Though I have not been able to re-produce the problem here, I think I
have fixed the problem ( More than one unit-test were having the same
test-name and at a previous occasion this was causing the unit-tests
to behave strangely ).
Please let me know if this problem surfaces again.
Thanks a
Cyrille,
Will take a look at this today evening and get back to you...
- Ganesh
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Cyrille Berger Skott
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get random failures in kotext-odf-TestChangeTracking, sometimes it passes,
> sometimes it fails, and I have two different failures:
>
> http:
Hi,
I get random failures in kotext-odf-TestChangeTracking, sometimes it passes,
sometimes it fails, and I have two different failures:
http://my.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=5674086&build=176936
http://my.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=5675430&build=176953
--
Cyrille Berger Skott
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
