Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
ent:* 5. januar 2017 11:45 > *To:* Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list < > calligra-devel@kde.org> > *Subject:* Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature > > > > > > > > On 5 January 2017 at 11:32, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jar

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Camilla Boemann
Behalf Of Jaroslaw Staniek Sent: 5. januar 2017 11:45 To: Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list Subject: Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature On 5 January 2017 at 11:32, Boudewijn Rempt mailto:b...@valdyas.org> > wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 5 Jan

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 11:32, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > > > > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > > > >

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > > > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > > > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape just

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 11:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape just made a > > release that highlights a port to GTK+3 as an

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > IMHO ​If it's not​ marked as a big thing, the media and users will > definitely mark this as not important and move over. Inkscape just made a > release that highlights a port to GTK+3 as an important news. Um... The version inkscape just released isn

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 January 2017 at 10:03, Dag wrote: > Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: > >> I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so maybe >> someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? >> > Since it is mainly a port it isn't that much to highlight, but what *i

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Many thanks for your sustained, herculian effort Boudewijn!

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-05 Thread Dag
Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so maybe someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? Since it is mainly a port it isn't that much to highlight, but what *is* in and what is *not in* is the main thing imo.

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Dag
2017 13:46 To: Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list Subject: RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so maybe someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? I was thi

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Camilla Boemann
Subject: RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: > I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so > maybe someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? I was thinking something like this for the packagers: A new

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Dag
Camilla Boemann skrev den 2017-01-03 12:59: I have prepared a release announcement, but it doesn't say much so maybe someone has suggestions as to what we should highlight? I was thinking something like this for the packagers: A new version of Calligra has been released and files can be found

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2017-01-03 11:57: > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > > > > > > > Looks fine, it's a go from me! > > > > > > Okay -- as soon as someone has done a release announcement, I'll > > > up

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2017-01-03 11:57: > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > > > > > > > Looks fine, it's a go from me! > > > > > > Okay -- as soon as someone has done a release announcement, I'll > > > up

RE: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Camilla Boemann
empt Sent: 3. januar 2017 11:58 To: Calligra Suite developers and users mailing list Subject: Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > > > Looks fine, it's a go from me! > > Okay -- as soon as someon

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Dag
Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2017-01-03 11:57: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > Looks fine, it's a go from me! Okay -- as soon as someone has done a release announcement, I'll upload and we can publish. I was thinking like this: You upload, I notify p

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > > > Looks fine, it's a go from me! > > Okay -- as soon as someone has done a release announcment, I'll > upload and we can publish. Oh, and I've put the public key here: https://share.kde.org/index.php/s/fJ99V5mZvuyD

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 3 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > Looks fine, it's a go from me! Okay -- as soon as someone has done a release announcment, I'll upload and we can publish. > > Dag skrev den 2017-01-02 13:49: > > Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2017-01-02 13:12: > > > I've updated the tarball and the sig -- the tarbal

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-03 Thread Dag
Looks fine, it's a go from me! Dag skrev den 2017-01-02 13:49: Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2017-01-02 13:12: I've updated the tarball and the sig -- the tarball is now 58M Yes, looks better, I'm running a clean build now to test. On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017,

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-02 Thread Dag
Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2017-01-02 13:12: I've updated the tarball and the sig -- the tarball is now 58M Yes, looks better, I'm running a clean build now to test. On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Weird... I just let the script do its

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-02 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
I've updated the tarball and the sig -- the tarball is now 58M On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > > Weird... I just let the script do its work, and then sign manually. So it > > should compress the tarball. Even weirder, when I tried today,

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-02 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Weird... I just let the script do its work, and then sign manually. So it > should compress the tarball. Even weirder, when I tried today, it suddenly > started asking for my key's passphrase for checking out the translations > a zillion times. Hm, loo

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-02 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Weird... I just let the script do its work, and then sign manually. So it should compress the tarball. Even weirder, when I tried today, it suddenly started asking for my key's passphrase for checking out the translations a zillion times. On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Dag wrote: > Hi, Boudewijn > Happy new

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2017-01-02 Thread Dag
Hi, Boudewijn Happy new year. The tarball seems ok, except it is not compressed. The create_tarball script also uses the -a (or --armor) option to sign. Cheers, Dag Boudewijn Rempt skrev den 2016-12-28 15:05: Hi, I've finally figured out how to fix gpg-agent, so next to http://valdyas.org/~b

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2016-12-29 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Interestingly that gives a Bad gpg signature. What did you use to > make the signature? > > The command I use is > gpg2 --armor --detach-sign -o foo.tar.xz.sig foo.tar.xz gpg2 --output calligra-3.0.0.1.tar.xz.sig --detach-sig calligra-3.0.0.1.tar.

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2016-12-29 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 29 Dec 2016, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > On 28 December 2016 at 14:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > http://valdyas.org/~boud/0x58b9596c722ea3bd.asc > > gpg --send-key 722ea3bd > > should make it appear on keyservers and you can link to it > > e.g. https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=v

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2016-12-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Interestingly that gives a Bad gpg signature. What did you use to make the signature? The command I use is gpg2 --armor --detach-sign -o foo.tar.xz.sig foo.tar.xz Jonathan On 28 December 2016 at 14:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Hi, > > I've finally figured out how to fix gpg-agent, so next to >

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2016-12-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 28 December 2016 at 14:05, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > http://valdyas.org/~boud/0x58b9596c722ea3bd.asc gpg --send-key 722ea3bd should make it appear on keyservers and you can link to it e.g. https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xEC94D18F7F05997E

Re: 3.0.0.1 tarball + signature

2016-12-28 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Share.kde.org exists to share files or put on depot with the permissions hidden from world readable On Wednesday, 28 December 2016, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Hi, > > I've finally figured out how to fix gpg-agent, so next to > > http://valdyas.org/~boud/calligra-3.0.0.1.tar.xz > > there's now also