On dinsdag 3 december 2019 15:54:53 CET Carl Schwan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to know if we could change the Qt dependency from Qt 5.3 to Qt 5.9
> at least.
>
> I think some parts already depends on Qt 5.7 at least. For example in
> Calligra Gemini, there is
> a dependency to Kirigami, that
Hello,
I wanted to know if we could change the Qt dependency from Qt 5.3 to Qt 5.9 at
least.
I think some parts already depends on Qt 5.7 at least. For example in Calligra
Gemini, there is
a dependency to Kirigami, that depends on Qt Quick Control 2 introduced in Qt
5.7.
I suppose there are t
Ok, thanks all, we'll stay put on 5.3 fttb.
Although I would be veeery suprised if it actually compiles, new stuff
seems to just creep in.
Anybody has a 5.3 system available?
Cheers,
Dag
Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2019-01-15 21:25:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 21:13, Adam Pigg wrote:
Sailfish wil
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 21:13, Adam Pigg wrote:
> Sailfish will shortly (tm) be upgrading to 5.9 so that wont block for
> much longer i hope. My understanding is they are working out the
> legal issues around the license changes ... technically the port is
> ready. I dont really understand the i
Sailfish will shortly (tm) be upgrading to 5.9 so that wont block for
much longer i hope. My understanding is they are working out the
legal issues around the license changes ... technically the port is
ready. I dont really understand the issue myself!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 12:01, René J.V. Ber
On Tuesday January 15 2019 12:53:03 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> If there's no reason to force upgrade, I would not. Also (guess what) LTS
> distros seem refuse to upgrade without users doing extra steps.
Amen to that!
I'm very annoyed by the fact that KF5 Frameworks just moved to Qt 5.10, for no
r
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 12:44, wrote:
> Any reason not to require qt 5.9?
> We are at 5.3 atm.
>
Not strictly related to calligra.git but similar case for KEXI/KEXI
frameworks: it is caused by Sailfish depending on such older Qt.
If there's no reason to force upgrade, I would not. Also (guess wh
Any reason not to require qt 5.9?
We are at 5.3 atm.
Am Mittwoch, 10. August 2016, 14:27:06 CEST schrieb Dag:
> I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
> which qt version will be used in the release?
I personally would not mind bumping the minimal required versions to Qt 5.6
and KF5 5.16 at least.
Reasoning:
No
On Wednesday August 10 2016 14:49:35 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>I think traditionally even 5.6+ -only things shall be ifdef'd.
>
>I am sure 5.7+ things *should* be and the code should compile with 5.5.
>(Assuming we're targeting LTS distros and alike that may even have 5.3,
>which is a reasonable mi
On
Behalf Of
Dag
Sent: 10. august 2016 14:27
To: calligra-devel@kde.org
Subject: Qt version
I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
which qt version will be used in the release?
Cheers, Dag
--
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek
KDE:
: A world-wide network of software engineer
ugust 2016 14:27
> To: calligra-devel@kde.org
> Subject: Qt version
>
> I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
> which qt version will be used in the release?
>
> Cheers, Dag
>
>
--
regards, Jaroslaw Staniek
KDE:
: A world-wide network
My build machine (debian) is still 5.6 so until they are at 5.7 I cannot
agree to bumping higher than 5.6
-Original Message-
From: calligra-devel [mailto:calligra-devel-boun...@kde.org] On Behalf Of
Dag
Sent: 10. august 2016 14:27
To: calligra-devel@kde.org
Subject: Qt version
I added a
I added a 5.7 specific thing recently, which prompts the question:
which qt version will be used in the release?
Cheers, Dag
14 matches
Mail list logo
