Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Wednesday, February 08, 2012 15:16:47 Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/08/2012 02:54 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > > On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > >> On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/08/201

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > > If e.g. Secret Service cannot be useful without DBus, then it has no > place on platforms that use other means than DBus, it's simple I > see no reason to fix it outside of Secret Service itself. > > The idea is to be able to compile

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 8 February 2012 15:56, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> >> >> > I talked about this with Holger Schöder at FOSDEM. >> >> >> >> What's you opinion - where is QtMobility in this which has the same >> >> purpose? >> >> If possible - we su

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> > I talked about this with Holger Schöder at FOSDEM. > >> > >> What's you opinion - where is QtMobility in this which has the same > >> purpose? > >> If possible - we sure do not want to have this as KDE-only thing. > > > > > > Are you

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 8 February 2012 13:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> >> On 8 February 2012 11:50, Pau Garcia i Quiles >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> And yes, well, of course there

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/08/2012 02:54 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/08/2012 09:47 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sa

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/08/2012 09:47 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: An example would be the "Accounts" ap

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/08/2012 02:01 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/08/2012 09:47 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: An example would be the "Accounts" application shipped per default with the N9 that

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/08/2012 09:47 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > >> An example would be the "Accounts" application shipped per default with > >> the N9 that is using Telepathy offers additional

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/08/2012 01:30 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek > wrote: On 8 February 2012 11:50, Pau Garcia i Quiles mailto:pgqui...@elpauer.org>> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/08/2012 09:47 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: An example would be the "Accounts" application shipped per default with the N9 that is using Telepathy offers additional plugins via the store. Imagine how great it could have been if the "Do

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > On 8 February 2012 11:50, Pau Garcia i Quiles > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt > wrote: > >> > >> And yes, well, of course there are platform-local ways of ipc, on > windows > >> and android that we mi

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 8 February 2012 11:50, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> >> And yes, well, of course there are platform-local ways of ipc, on windows >> and android that we might want to use instead of dbus, if there is demand >> for it. >> > > I talked

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Wednesday 08 February 2012 Feb, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > An example would be the "Accounts" application shipped per default with > the N9 that is using Telepathy offers additional plugins via the store. > Imagine how great it could have been if the "Documents" application (aka > Calligra on t

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/07/2012 11:00 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 7 February 2012 22:31, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/07/2012 08:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 7 February 2012 20:34, Sebastian Sauerwrote: On 02/07/2012 03:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: I

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 7 February 2012 22:31, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/07/2012 08:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> >> On 7 February 2012 20:34, Sebastian Sauer  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/07/2012 03:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > I am not sure about the

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/07/2012 08:54 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 7 February 2012 20:34, Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/07/2012 03:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: I am not sure about the plugin idea. Plugins are good if there are alternative means implemented support

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 7 February 2012 20:41, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/07/2012 08:25 PM, Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 07:59:55 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote: >>> >>> On 02/07/2012 02:52 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > > What

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 7 February 2012 20:34, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/07/2012 03:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> >> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: >> >>> I am not sure about the plugin idea. Plugins are good if there are >>> alternative means implemented supporting the same interface - here the >

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/07/2012 08:25 PM, Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 07:59:55 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote: On 02/07/2012 02:52 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote: What I would like to do is to introduce in Calligra a way to completely disable any use

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/07/2012 03:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: I am not sure about the plugin idea. Plugins are good if there are alternative means implemented supporting the same interface - here the generic local communication. Is that the case here? How about comp

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Tuesday, February 07, 2012 07:59:55 PM Sebastian Sauer wrote: > On 02/07/2012 02:52 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > >> What I would like to do is to introduce in Calligra a way to > >> completely disable any use of dbus. The target would be to 1) make

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 02/07/2012 02:52 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote: What I would like to do is to introduce in Calligra a way to completely disable any use of dbus. The target would be to 1) make Calligra compile with #define QT_NO_DBUS and 2) make Calligra optionally co

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 7 February 2012 15:09, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > >> I am not sure about the plugin idea. Plugins are good if there are >> alternative means implemented supporting the same interface - here the >> generic local communication. >> Is that the case here?

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: I am not sure about the plugin idea. Plugins are good if there are alternative means implemented supporting the same interface - here the generic local communication. Is that the case here? How about complexity that would not pay off? Compile switche

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On 7 February 2012 14:52, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote: > >> What I would like to do is to introduce in Calligra a way to completely >> disable any use of dbus. The target would be to 1) make Calligra compile >> with #define QT_NO_DBUS and 2) make Calligra opt

Re: Making dbus optional in Calligra

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Sebastian Sauer wrote: What I would like to do is to introduce in Calligra a way to completely disable any use of dbus. The target would be to 1) make Calligra compile with #define QT_NO_DBUS and 2) make Calligra optionally compile without support for dbus even if Qt-dbus i

Making dbus optional in Calligra

What I would like to do is to introduce in Calligra a way to completely disable any use of dbus. The target would be to 1) make Calligra compile with #define QT_NO_DBUS and 2) make Calligra optionally compile without support for dbus even if Qt-dbus is available. The idea is to address one of