On 3 September 2015 at 12:00, Cyrille Berger wrote:
> On 2015-08-31 15:38, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
>>
>> I am OK with Monday. We'd need to adjust to this day when we prepare
>> releases. E.g. tagging was on Saturday so far, now it would make sense
>> just after the Monday BIC, right?
>
>
> Actuall
On 2015-08-31 15:38, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
I am OK with Monday. We'd need to adjust to this day when we prepare
releases. E.g. tagging was on Saturday so far, now it would make sense
just after the Monday BIC, right?
Actually it would make sense to do it before the breakage, so that all
the
I am OK with Monday. We'd need to adjust to this day when we prepare
releases. E.g. tagging was on Saturday so far, now it would make sense just
after the Monday BIC, right?
Also, am I allowed to delete the kexi-framework* branches in the
calligra.git origin?
On 31 August 2015 at 15:32, Friedrich
Am Montag, 31. August 2015, 12:46:30 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> Partial response, no time for more now.
>
> On 31 August 2015 at 12:15, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>
> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 31. August 2015, 02:29:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> > > >> For people building largely by hand, I'd introd
Partial response, no time for more now.
On 31 August 2015 at 12:15, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Am Montag, 31. August 2015, 02:29:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> > >> For people building largely by hand, I'd introduce a support for
> > >> specific case: a
> > >> find_package wrapper that ch
Am Montag, 31. August 2015, 02:29:29 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 31 August 2015 at 01:46, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 30. August 2015, 23:21:59 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> >> On 28 August 2015 at 19:10, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > wit
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 31 August 2015 at 01:46, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, 30. August 2015, 23:21:59 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>>> On 28 August 2015 at 19:10, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > with KDb, KProperty
On 31 August 2015 at 01:46, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 30. August 2015, 23:21:59 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
>> On 28 August 2015 at 19:10, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > with KDb, KProperty and KReport, a few libs/frameworks have been already
>> > split off
Am Sonntag, 30. August 2015, 23:21:59 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek:
> On 28 August 2015 at 19:10, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > with KDb, KProperty and KReport, a few libs/frameworks have been already
> > split off during the port of Calligra to Qt5/KF5.
> >
> > And they pose a ch
On 28 August 2015 at 19:10, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with KDb, KProperty and KReport, a few libs/frameworks have been already split
> off during the port of Calligra to Qt5/KF5.
>
> And they pose a challenge that needs to be solved quickly:
> traditionally we have had no ABI guara
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
What do you think? Would this work for you as well?
I'd say that having a regular bump day would indeed be the best idea,
say every Saturday morning. That would also work if we still decide
to split of other calligra libraries so they can
Hi,
with KDb, KProperty and KReport, a few libs/frameworks have been already split
off during the port of Calligra to Qt5/KF5.
And they pose a challenge that needs to be solved quickly:
traditionally we have had no ABI guarantuee in Calligra even in patch releases
and of course also not during
12 matches
Mail list logo
