On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:01:48 +0100, Boudewijn Rempt
wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
>> > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake
>> tools.
>> > At the moment we have two tools for gradient,
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > >
On Wednesday 19 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake
> >
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake
> tools.
> > > At the moment we have two tools for gradient, path
On Wednesday 19 January 2011, C. Boemann wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake tools.
> > At the moment we have two tools for gradient, path and freehand.
> Combining gradient,pattern tools to one, and combini
On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> We should think about the possibility to remove some of the flake tools.
> At the moment we have two tools for gradient, path and freehand.
Combining gradient,pattern tools to one, and combining path and freehand tools
is very much on my wishlist.
On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
>
> A second toolbox wouldn't reduce inconsistency. I would have to be at the
> top where the problem would still be the same, or at the bottom where it
> would be like my solution.
>
If it's at the top, there's at least a clear separation.
> >
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created a new branch (krita-toolbox-langkamp) to propose a change
> to
> > the toolbox. Currently the flake tools are on top of the other ones in
> all
> > application
On Tuesday 18 January 2011, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a new branch (krita-toolbox-langkamp) to propose a change to
> the toolbox. Currently the flake tools are on top of the other ones in all
> applications. In Krita those tools are only secondary to the painting tools,
> so it
Hi,
I have created a new branch (krita-toolbox-langkamp) to propose a change to
the toolbox. Currently the flake tools are on top of the other ones in all
applications. In Krita those tools are only secondary to the painting tools,
so it can be confusing to the users that the shape tools are on to
11 matches
Mail list logo