D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-03-13 Thread Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
leinir added a comment. For those who mentioned they would like part of the splitty-outy thing: Please pop over here and take a look and make a comment or five and let's get this under way - https://phabricator.kde.org/T12815 :) REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-03-13 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
tcanabrava abandoned this revision. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0, danders Cc: danders, rjvbb, awilcox, dcaliste, leinir, asturmlechner, ognarb, anthonyfieroni, Calligra-Devel-list, davidllewellynjones, cochise, vand

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-03-13 Thread Dag Andersen
danders added a reviewer: danders. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0, danders Cc: danders, rjvbb, awilcox, dcaliste, leinir, asturmlechner, ognarb, anthonyfieroni, Calligra-Devel-list, davidllewellynjones, cochise, vande

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-03-12 Thread Dag Andersen
danders added a comment. @tcanabrava please abondone this. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0 Cc: danders, rjvbb, awilcox, dcaliste, leinir, asturmlechner, ognarb, anthonyfieroni, Calligra-Devel-list, davidllewellynjo

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-03-09 Thread Dag Andersen
danders added a comment. Ooops, seems I fixed this (+ 0.83) in separate commits, so this can be closed. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0 Cc: danders, rjvbb, awilcox, dcaliste, leinir, asturmlechner, ognarb, anthonyf

Re: D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-01-13 Thread René J . V . Bertin
> I am a firm +1 on splitting Calligra +++ At the very least, the build system should be able to generate the shared parts as well as the different components (wordprocessor, spreadsheet, ...) separately (and depending on the installed shared libraries, for the components). Once that's done it

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2020-01-13 Thread A. Wilcox
awilcox added a comment. See Poppler's site for what distros/OSes have which versions. I think dropping pre-62 may be safe. Definitely not 72. I am a firm +1 on splitting Calligra and as a distro maintainer we would be happy to provide testing for it

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-28 Thread Damien Caliste
dcaliste added a comment. I like the idea of trying to move away from the monolythic release. Not that my opinion matters much, but I'm willing to help in the endeavor. I'll try to participate in tasks in that direction as much as my free time will allow it. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISIO

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-26 Thread Carl Schwan
ognarb added a comment. In D26050#583223 , @leinir wrote: > In D26050#583007 , @ognarb wrote: > > > In D26050#582981 , @asturmlechner wrote: > > > > > I

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-26 Thread Anthony Fieroni
anthonyfieroni added a comment. I'm pretty sure Krita devs think about when they split application out of Calligra repo and make its own copy of libs, flakes, etc. So beneficial of splitting libs in their own release plan will be for all applications. That will a huge work pretty underrated

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-26 Thread Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen
leinir added a comment. In D26050#583007 , @ognarb wrote: > In D26050#582981 , @asturmlechner wrote: > > > In D26050#578862 , @anthonyfieroni wrote: > >

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-25 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
asturmlechner added a comment. In D26050#583007 , @ognarb wrote: > In D26050#582981 , @asturmlechner wrote: > > > In D26050#578862 , @anthonyfieroni wrote:

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-25 Thread Carl Schwan
ognarb added a comment. In D26050#582981 , @asturmlechner wrote: > In D26050#578862 , @anthonyfieroni wrote: > > > Maybe we can drop 62, but not 72. > > > If this is for master I don't see why

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-25 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
asturmlechner added a comment. In D26050#578862 , @anthonyfieroni wrote: > Maybe we can drop 62, but not 72. If this is for master I don't see why we could keep anything pre-0.79. Distros already have to patch the hell out of 3.1.0 which

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-25 Thread Carl Schwan
ognarb added a comment. Doesn't compile for me with Poppler 81. So I created a small patch on top of your patch F7835712: poppler-81.patch REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-16 Thread Anthony Fieroni
anthonyfieroni added a comment. Maybe we can drop 62, but not 72. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0 Cc: anthonyfieroni, Calligra-Devel-list, davidllewellynjones, dcaliste, ognarb, cochise, vandenoever

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-16 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
tcanabrava created this revision. Herald added a project: Calligra: 3.0. Herald added a subscriber: Calligra-Devel-list. tcanabrava requested review of this revision. REVISION SUMMARY Perhaps it's time to drop poppler 62 support? Perhaps it's time to drop poppler 72 support? We still have

D26050: Fix build with poppler 82

2019-12-16 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
tcanabrava added a reviewer: Calligra: 3.0. REPOSITORY R8 Calligra REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D26050 To: tcanabrava, #calligra:_3.0 Cc: Calligra-Devel-list, davidllewellynjones, dcaliste, ognarb, cochise, vandenoever