On Donnerstag 29 September 2011 13:17:27 Inge Wallin wrote:
> No, one developer is not enough. They have some form of simple vote
> procedure but I haven't worked out the details yet.
Bugzilla has a voting feature. Why not simply look at those?
___
cal
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 13:17:27 PM Inge Wallin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 29, 2011 13:13:35 C. Boemann wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 September 2011 12:59:19 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > > LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is
> > > made dependent on what they deem
On Thursday 29 September 2011 13:38:49 Markus Slopianka wrote:
> > trouble with these kind of things is that it becomes a "who can shout the
> > loudest" contest.
> >
> > So if there was a good way to measure it i would agree, but nomination by
> > one annoyed user is not it imho.
>
> Well, crash
> trouble with these kind of things is that it becomes a "who can shout the
> loudest" contest.
>
> So if there was a good way to measure it i would agree, but nomination by
> one annoyed user is not it imho.
Well, crashers and data losses are good candidates.
On Thursday, September 29, 2011 13:13:35 C. Boemann wrote:
> On Thursday 29 September 2011 12:59:19 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is made
> > dependent on what they deem the most annoying bugs at any given time. I
> > think this is a good i
On Thursday 29 September 2011 12:59:19 Inge Wallin wrote:
> LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is made
> dependent on what they deem the most annoying bugs at any given time. I
> think this is a good idea that we could imitate, especially when we are
> getting close t
LibreOffice has an interesting thing. They have a meta bug that is made
dependent on what they deem the most annoying bugs at any given time. I think
this is a good idea that we could imitate, especially when we are getting
close to the release..
Here is the link if anybody wants to check it
