Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 4 September 2016 at 17:28, Adam Pigg wrote: > I wonder how we can utilise one of the new container distribution formats > such as > ​​ > flatpak or snap for distributing betas. Probably need to do some > research, would be handy to not rely on distros for pushing out betas, or > have users bu

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 4 September 2016 at 10:06, Dag wrote: > Can't give you much advice on releases ;) > but +1 for stable releases, so we can avoid the odd regression we've seen > in the past. > KReport / KProperty is used in Plan so would be nice to have any planned > API/ABI changes in before release. > > OK, D

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Adam Pigg
I wonder how we can utilise one of the new container distribution formats such as flatpak or snap for distributing betas. Probably need to do some research, would be handy to not rely on distros for pushing out betas, or have users building from source. On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 at 09:06 Dag wrote: >

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Dag
Can't give you much advice on releases ;) but +1 for stable releases, so we can avoid the odd regression we've seen in the past. KReport / KProperty is used in Plan so would be nice to have any planned API/ABI changes in before release. Cheers, Dag Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2016-08-31 10:45:

3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-08-31 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Hello, KDE Akademy[1] is starting so I thought it might be a good point to push the Beta release button for Kexi and related frameworks: KDb KProperty KReport (depends on KProperty) tl;dr: - we need source distribution of Kexi and the 3 frameworks to get more users and contributors - we need to f