GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/calligra%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/217/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 04:52:25 +
Build duration: 39 min
CHANGE SET
Revision 4bc4a45c66b11f6eacd97654bad2350f0f086747 b
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 07:45:15 +1300
Ben Cooksley wrote:
[snip]
>
> I think that we need some cleanup on the old reviews (Albert Astal Cid
> started
> some time ago) and more important strongly tell new users (and old
> users) to use Phabricator. I don't think that anyone wants to lose
> the work, b
On Wednesday February 01 2017 23:03:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> You'd be surprised (yes i have a script that actually applies the MRs and
> lots
> of them even very old apply).
Old also doesn't mean unmaintained. I have a number of RRs that I keep rebasing
because I'm still waiting for a gre
El dijous, 2 de febrer de 2017, a les 7:45:15 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> Anything older than that usually won't apply to the code anymore.
You'd be surprised (yes i have a script that actually applies the MRs and lots
of them even very old apply).
Cheers,
Albert
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:56:52 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin
> wrote:
>> > On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>> > >From this point fo
On 2/02/2017 12:41 AM, "Luigi Toscano" wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 10:31:44 CET Francis Herne wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to reply-all and only sent to kdevelop-devel...
>
> -
>
> Hi,
>
> First off, there's a lot of postponed, or at least possibly-useful,
> work on ReviewBoard whi
On 1/02/2017 10:38 PM, "René J.V. Bertin" wrote:
On Wednesday February 1 2017 22:16:50 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>We'd still have to keep the software running, and up to date (to avoid
>it becoming a security risk).
Running yes, but if log-in is disabled at the core and not linked to the
central LDAP
Sorry, forgot to reply-all and only sent to kdevelop-devel...
-
Hi,
First off, there's a lot of postponed, or at least possibly-useful,
work on ReviewBoard which would be lost. Some of this is from newish
contributors who might be discouraged - e.g. the author of
https://git.reviewbo
Completely agreeing with Rene, Luigi and Milian.
All this sounds very sad to me.
Phabricator is indeed very powerful and better for management stuff.
But Differential is not even merely comparable to RB by ease of use, mail
notifications, review immediateness and usage speed...
> On Tuesday, Janu
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 7:56:52 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin
wrote:
> > On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Rene,
>
> > >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from
> >>
> >>Review
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 10:31:44 CET Francis Herne wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to reply-all and only sent to kdevelop-devel...
>
> -
>
> Hi,
>
> First off, there's a lot of postponed, or at least possibly-useful,
> work on ReviewBoard which would be lost. Some of this is from newish
On Wednesday, 1 February 2017 11:52:01 CET Alexander Zhigalin wrote:
> Completely agreeing with Rene, Luigi and Milian.
> All this sounds very sad to me.
> Phabricator is indeed very powerful and better for management stuff.
> But Differential is not even merely comparable to RB by ease of use, mai
On Wednesday February 1 2017 22:16:50 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>We'd still have to keep the software running, and up to date (to avoid
>it becoming a security risk).
Running yes, but if log-in is disabled at the core and not linked to the
central LDAP service or whatever it is you use, what significa
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:26 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Wednesday February 1 2017 20:59:46 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>>
>>While I have yet to test it, Reviewboard does use quite a bit of AJAX
>>and other dynamic resources - so I won't be surprised to find out that
>>the usual mechanisms fo
On Wednesday February 1 2017 20:59:46 Ben Cooksley wrote:
Hi
>
>While I have yet to test it, Reviewboard does use quite a bit of AJAX
>and other dynamic resources - so I won't be surprised to find out that
>the usual mechanisms for creating static copies of sites don't produce
>a workable result.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Ben Cooksley ha scritto:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin
>> wrote:
>>> On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi Rene,
>>
>>>
>>> >From this point forward, communities should be moving
16 matches
Mail list logo
