Re: kdiagram in calligra project component?

2016-09-04 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi Jarosław, Am Montag, 5. September 2016, 01:03:32 CEST schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > Hi, > Background: The kde:sysadmin/repo-metadata git repo now replaces the > project.kde.org stuff. > I am moving kdb, kreport and kproperty repo metadata to projects/calligra > from playground/libs as I see them

Re: kdiagram in calligra project component?

2016-09-04 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 5 September 2016 at 01:03, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Hi, > Background: The kde:sysadmin/repo-metadata git repo now replaces the > project.kde.org stuff. > I am moving kdb, kreport and kproperty repo metadata to > ​​ > projects/calligra from playground/libs > ​Actually I invented ​projects/cal

kdiagram in calligra project component?

2016-09-04 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Hi, Background: The kde:sysadmin/repo-metadata git repo now replaces the project.kde.org stuff. I am moving kdb, kreport and kproperty repo metadata to projects/calligra from playground/libs as I see them more fit to the new location and they are, well, developed within our master project Calligra

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 4 September 2016 at 17:28, Adam Pigg wrote: > I wonder how we can utilise one of the new container distribution formats > such as > ​​ > flatpak or snap for distributing betas. Probably need to do some > research, would be handy to not rely on distros for pushing out betas, or > have users bu

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 4 September 2016 at 10:06, Dag wrote: > Can't give you much advice on releases ;) > but +1 for stable releases, so we can avoid the odd regression we've seen > in the past. > KReport / KProperty is used in Plan so would be nice to have any planned > API/ABI changes in before release. > > OK, D

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Adam Pigg
I wonder how we can utilise one of the new container distribution formats such as flatpak or snap for distributing betas. Probably need to do some research, would be handy to not rely on distros for pushing out betas, or have users building from source. On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 at 09:06 Dag wrote: >

Re: 3.0 Beta releases, compatibility

2016-09-04 Thread Dag
Can't give you much advice on releases ;) but +1 for stable releases, so we can avoid the odd regression we've seen in the past. KReport / KProperty is used in Plan so would be nice to have any planned API/ABI changes in before release. Cheers, Dag Jaroslaw Staniek skrev den 2016-08-31 10:45: