---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126797/
---
(Updated Jan. 19, 2016, 8:55 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126797/#review91297
---
Ship it!
This is fine, please go ahead and commit.
- Ben
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>
>> Reason that I ask is that due to the split of Calligra into several repos
>> (see background^) the layout in the repo structure does no longer properly
>> reflect the project organis
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> (calligra-devel, kexi-devel, kimageshop mailinglists only for heads-up,
> please remove from reply, discussion only on kde-core-devel should be fine)
>
> 4 months ago there was the thread "Proposal to improving KDE S
On 18 January 2016 at 20:27, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
>
> Reason that I ask is that due to the split of Calligra into several repos
>> (see background^) the layout in the repo structure does no longer properly
>> reflect the project organisatio
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Reason that I ask is that due to the split of Calligra into several repos (see
background^) the layout in the repo structure does no longer properly reflect
the project organisation. Right now there are three active repos in the
calligra/ re
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126797/
---
(Updated Jan. 18, 2016, 7:42 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra and Ben Co
Hi,
(calligra-devel, kexi-devel, kimageshop mailinglists only for heads-up,
please remove from reply, discussion only on kde-core-devel should be fine)
4 months ago there was the thread "Proposal to improving KDE Software
Repository Organization" on this mailinglist.
What happened to that plan?
On 18 January 2016 at 14:12, René J.V. wrote:
> On Monday January 18 2016 12:47:59 C. Boemann wrote:
>
> >Well what you would get is a really empty document then - not pages, no
> font,
> >no margins, no nothing - all of those decisions is what is stored in a
> >template. Having to code all those
On Monday January 18 2016 12:47:59 C. Boemann wrote:
>Well what you would get is a really empty document then - not pages, no font,
>no margins, no nothing - all of those decisions is what is stored in a
>template. Having to code all those decisions just for the sake of not loading
>a file with
On Monday 18 January 2016 11:28:17 René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday January 18 2016 10:05:32 boemann wrote:
> >One thing tohugh - it shouldn't be an empty document - I wan to get away
> >from this as we need all sorts ofinitial setup, and i want to remove the
> >custom dialog for the same reaso
On Monday January 18 2016 10:05:32 boemann wrote:
>One thing tohugh - it shouldn't be an empty document - I wan to get away from
>this as we need all sorts ofinitial setup, and i want to remove the custom
>dialog for the same reason - but anyway the default startup document should be
>the blan
boemann added a subscriber: boemann.
boemann added a comment.
I fully support this - but I was tol long ago that it actually isn't so easy to
do as it will depend on where things are installed or so - but perhabs now that
we use json it has become easier.
One thing tohugh - it shouldn't be an e
13 matches
Mail list logo
