Re: After 2.9.7

2015-08-28 Thread Cyrille Berger
On Friday 28 August 2015 15:43:12 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Well, we started the discussion with the idea that making separate repos > for the libraries and applications was going to be useful. That rather > soon turned into a discussion of the problems we have making our libraries > fit for purpose

RE: Big reformat of sources before unfreeze of master (was: Re: Schedule to switch back to master for feature development)

2015-08-28 Thread Camilla Boemann
-Original Message- Camilla, you also looked into that reformatting, no? Could you collect further experiences how to do that? I looked into a small program that could format the initializer list - but forgot all about it - I can look at it again on Tuesday - but it was meant to be ru

Heads-up: "master" get's Qt5/KF5-based, "frameworks" end-of-line on Aug. 29th

2015-08-28 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, if you have any pending commits for "master" or "frameworks", please get them in in the next hours. Because on Saturday, Aug. 29th somewhen after Noon CET, "frameworks" will be merged into "master" and cease to exist. And "master" that way will start to depend on Qt5/KF5. I will send an u

Big reformat of sources before unfreeze of master (was: Re: Schedule to switch back to master for feature development)

2015-08-28 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Freitag, 28. August 2015, 15:48:39 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > * after that: > > 2.9 only bugfixes, no more features > > master unfrozen, so open for features and porting from kdelibs4support > > I also would like to cleanup the coding s

Re: Schedule to switch back to master for feature development (was: Re: After 2.9.7)

2015-08-28 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Freitag, 28. August 2015, 15:48:39 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > In the meantime for everyone I would propose to turn Boud's other proposal > > about turning frameworks into master and open it back for development in > > this schedule: > > >

Handling of splitted Calligra repos and API changes

2015-08-28 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, with KDb, KProperty and KReport, a few libs/frameworks have been already split off during the port of Calligra to Qt5/KF5. And they pose a challenge that needs to be solved quickly: traditionally we have had no ABI guarantuee in Calligra even in patch releases and of course also not during

Jenkins-kde-ci: calligra calligra-2.9 stable-qt4 » Linux,All,gcc - Build # 211 - Still Unstable!

2015-08-28 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/calligra%20calligra-2.9%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc/211/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:46:52 + Build duration: 47 min CHANGE SET Revision 4eb9f

Jenkins-kde-ci: calligra calligra-2.9 stable-qt4 » Linux,All,gcc - Build # 210 - Still Unstable!

2015-08-28 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/calligra%20calligra-2.9%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc/210/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,Variation=All,compiler=gcc Date of build: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:36:39 + Build duration: 49 min CHANGE SET Revision dff62

Re: Schedule to switch back to master for feature development (was: Re: After 2.9.7)

2015-08-28 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: I fear splitting git repos, unless done brutally, will take some time to be well prepared (and also needs an agreement who to do it of all involved). So hoping to do that already next week might be ambitious :) Well, sure. But postponing it

Re: After 2.9.7

2015-08-28 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Cyrille Berger wrote: On 2015-08-27 09:57, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: For Krita, and I hate to say this, it probably makes sense to fork our shared libraries. The office-apps maintainers can then strip out all the krita-specific stuff, and for Krita, we can strip out the stuff

Re: After 2.9.7

2015-08-28 Thread Cyrille Berger
On 2015-08-27 09:57, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: For Krita, and I hate to say this, it probably makes sense to fork our shared libraries. The office-apps maintainers can then strip out all the krita-specific stuff, and for Krita, we can strip out the stuff that only makes sense for office applicati