Re: Rewriting Flow & formulashape for 3.0? (Re: Qt5 Port Status)

2015-04-09 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2015, 11:20:37 schrieb Yue Liu: > I agree we should port first then add new things, I'll drop ownership of > formulashape for now and continue working on libmathview. Ok, good we agree :) Will pick that shape tonight and see to make it build in the frameworks branch (unles

Re: Rewriting Flow & formulashape for 3.0? (Re: Qt5 Port Status)

2015-04-09 Thread Yue Liu
I agree we should port first then add new things, I'll drop ownership of formulashape for now and continue working on libmathview. For Flow it's just a kopageapp wrapper and a docker plugin that works in all calligra apps, so the "re-write" actually means to move the plugin code from Flow folder t

Re: Review Request 123295: Kexi find dialog size improvements.

2015-04-09 Thread Jarosław Staniek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123295/#review78717 --- Almost OK! kexi/main/kexifinddialog.cpp (line 127)

Re: Review Request 123295: Kexi find dialog size improvements.

2015-04-09 Thread Roman Shtemberko
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123295/ --- (Updated Апрель 9, 2015, 12:52 п.п.) Review request for Calligra, Adam Pi

Re: Review Request 123295: Kexi find dialog size improvements.

2015-04-09 Thread Roman Shtemberko
> On Апрель 8, 2015, 1:31 п.п., Jarosław Staniek wrote: > > kexi/main/kexifinddialog.ui, line 419 > > > > > > It seems these widgets are no longer in the tab order list, no idea why > > Designer did that. Let's

Review Request 123307: KoProperty -> KProperty everywhere in Calligra

2015-04-09 Thread Jarosław Staniek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123307/ --- Review request for Calligra, Andrius da Costa Ribas, Inge Wallin, Kamil Łys

Re: KDE4Macros.cmake needed in 3.x?

2015-04-09 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: Hi, Using cmake 2.8.12 I encountered an unsupported CMP0026 error because of this line in /CMakeLists.txt cmake_policy(SET CMP0026 OLD) Adding if(NOT ${CMAKE_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 3.0.0) would fix this. OK to push? I guess so But first, is KDE4Ma

KDE4Macros.cmake needed in 3.x?

2015-04-09 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Hi, Using cmake 2.8.12 I encountered an unsupported CMP0026 error because of this line in /CMakeLists.txt cmake_policy(SET CMP0026 OLD) Adding if(NOT ${CMAKE_VERSION} VERSION_LESS 3.0.0) would fix this. OK to push? But first, is KDE4Macros.cmake needed? -- regards, Jaroslaw Staniek KDE: : A wo

Re: Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 9 April 2015 at 11:07, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2015, 10:53:20 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> I see - so would you say it's better to have Building for 2.x and >> Building/New for 3.x for now (for these who do not read the bold text >> notes)? > > What about not "

Re: Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Yes... People don't read warnings, in my experience. On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: I see - so would you say it's better to have Building for 2.x and Building/New for 3.x for now (for these who do not read the bold text notes)? On 9 April 2015 at 10:49, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Er

Re: Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2015, 10:53:20 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > I see - so would you say it's better to have Building for 2.x and > Building/New for 3.x for now (for these who do not read the bold text > notes)? What about not "Building/New", but "Building 3.x"... And for future versions we al

Re: Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
I see - so would you say it's better to have Building for 2.x and Building/New for 3.x for now (for these who do not read the bold text notes)? On 9 April 2015 at 10:49, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Er... > > It's much, much, much too early for that in my opinion! While most people > who want to buil

Re: Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Er... It's much, much, much too early for that in my opinion! While most people who want to build krita probably are using Deevad's cat guide, there is still a fair number who use this page. And I really don't want to face a daily round of "I followed https://community.kde.org/Calligra/Buildin

Re: What's new in KReport & KProperty & Predicate

2015-04-09 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Please publish the patch as an attachment as we did before. We're waiting for admins and systems to synchronize everything. Sure, I don't touch kreport to avoid conflicts :) Just updating calligra frameworks branch to reflect changes that happened to koproperty. On 9 April 2015 at 08:01, Adam Pig

Re: Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Related thing, For the needs of Kexi contributors there's a Dependencies section in the Kexi Port space [1]. Feel free to verify that one. I am aware such instructions, once tested enough, will eventually land within the https://community.kde.org/Calligra/Building. [1] https://community.kde.org/K

Building instructions cloned

2015-04-09 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Hi, I've cloned the building instructions from [1] https://community.kde.org/Calligra/Building to [2] https://community.kde.org/Calligra/Building/Old, so the current WIP instructions for Calligra 3.x stay at [1] and the old for 2.x is properly archived. [1] so far isn't a working build manual of c