[Port blocker] Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

Am Dienstag, 3. März 2015, 23:37:02 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > First let's verify if astyle-kdelibs changes only whitespace. Okay, I propose that we wait with the porting start until this got sorted out. No pressing need to really start porting today, 2-3 more days don't hurt here, and there ar

Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

And: - astyle-kdelibs is for public libs. Decision whether it is applied to apps and private libs belongs to the given team. - Please verify if it really 100% works as kdelibs coding style requires. I built 2.05.1 earlier this year (not just a binary from opensuse) and it was broken. For example

Re: [Kexi-devel] RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

First let's verify if astyle-kdelibs changes only whitespace. On 3 March 2015 at 23:29, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 19:03:30 schrieb Thorsten Zachmann: >> Hello, >> >> > I say it should be done now, and be done to 2.9 too >> > >> > And I almost don't think ma

Re: RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

On 3 March 2015 at 23:18, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 22:49:54 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> On 27 February 2015 at 01:36, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau > wrote: >> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:39:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: >> >> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01

Re: RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 19:03:30 schrieb Thorsten Zachmann: > Hello, > > > I say it should be done now, and be done to 2.9 too > > > > And I almost don't think maintainers should be able to say no. The long > > term goal of having a clean codebase is more important than short term > > issue

Re: RFC: plan for starting the Qt5/KF5 port

Am Freitag, 27. Februar 2015, 22:49:54 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > On 27 February 2015 at 01:36, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015, 09:39:27 schrieb Jaroslaw Staniek: > >> On 25 February 2015 at 01:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau > > > > wrote: > >> > Am Dienstag, 2

Re: Review Request 119368: Added shortcuts for performing actions on report's items in Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119368/#review76970 --- kexi/plugins/reports/kexireportdesignview.cpp

Re: Review Request 119368: Added shortcuts for performing actions on report's items in Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119368/#review76969 --- Ship it! Works well! (when there's one section displayed) So

Re: Review Request 119368: Added shortcuts for performing actions on report's items in Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119368/ --- (Updated Mar 3, 2015, 9:43 po południu) Review request for Calligra, Adam

Re: Review Request 119368: Added shortcuts for performing actions on report's items in Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119368/#review76968 --- I think revision #3 is put by mistake here, should be elsewher

Re: Review Request 119368: Added shortcuts for performing actions on report's items in Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119368/ --- (Updated Mar 3, 2015, 4:44 po południu) Review request for Calligra, Adam

Re: Kexi porting: kproperty and kreport still in scratch repos for now

I did not forget about kreport. I have a linear history in src/ already. Please expect the repo updated after 2.9.1 tagging. On 27 February 2015 at 21:12, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > For the record, one of the commands that have put my SSD on fire for a > few hours (Calligra has 95k commits): > > g