---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121572/
---
Review request for Calligra and Boudewijn Rempt.
Bugs: 331791
http://
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121509/
---
(Updated Gru 16, 2014, 11:26 po południu)
Review request for Calligra, Ad
> On Dec. 16, 2014, 7:51 p.m., Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Maybe we can move the check for whether the canvas is the same to the
> > KoCanvasObserver code?
setCanvas is called from another place too, i put the check there so that one
doesn't have to remember to make the same check everytime one
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121559/#review72136
---
Ship it!
Maybe we can move the check for whether the canvas i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121559/#review72130
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sven Langkamp
On Dez. 16, 2014, 4:26 n
On Monday 15 December 2014 13:04:53 Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> * Carbon and Plan is known to be in this situation already.
> * Calligra Author and Braindump were the new kids labeled as
> experimental and are now in this group too.
For braindump, I will clarify. I feel like the application has hit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121559/
---
(Updated Dec. 16, 2014, 4:26 p.m.)
Review request for Calligra.
Summary
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121559/
---
Review request for Calligra.
Repository: calligra
Description
---
> On Dec. 16, 2014, 11:20 a.m., Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > It looks good to me. I'm not sure it should be applied at the start though
> > -- I'm wondering whether it makes sense to build everything when we're
> > applying Laurent's porting scripts, and then set to unported everything
> > once
We discussed the Qt5 port at the sprint. Some notes are here:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=calligra-devel&m=140480621024543&w=2
The previous port was done for the Jolla Sailfish port of Calligra. It's
based on a copy of an outdated version of frameworks 5, and it's never
been kept up to date with m
Only tangentially related to this topic, but as it was mentioned here --
where can I find some information about the current status of the Qt5 port?
I have found some discussions from 2013 and two branches in the repo, but
the last commit on those is more than a year ago, so not sure if those are
a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121541/#review72112
---
It looks good to me. I'm not sure it should be applied at the
12 matches
Mail list logo
