Hi,
After reading through the discussion I see packagers may be interested
in tarball layouts rather than git layouts.
As we discussed at the sprint, big changes are coming with the Qt 5
port and we take this opportunity to fix/break things. If there's any
splitting of code that I am maintaining, i
On 2014-08-18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> What I understood from the irc conversation is that separate tarballs
> would be okay for Kubuntu, but that debian insists on 1 repo = 1 tarball.
> But that needs verification.
Debian does not insist on anything regarding repository layout.
/Sune
__
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-08-18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
Hi,
I know we sort of decided to only do this after 2.9, but I just picked up
Jonathan Riddell's discussion on irc on how our current repository and
release makes life harder for packagers -- basically a split up r
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Cyrille Berger wrote:
Hello,
On 2014-08-18 09:56, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
I know we sort of decided to only do this after 2.9, but I just picked
up Jonathan Riddell's discussion on irc on how our current repository
and release makes life harder for packagers -- basically a
On 2014-08-18, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know we sort of decided to only do this after 2.9, but I just picked up
> Jonathan Riddell's discussion on irc on how our current repository and
> release makes life harder for packagers -- basically a split up repo
> would be easier, apparently
Hello,
On 2014-08-18 09:56, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
I know we sort of decided to only do this after 2.9, but I just picked
up Jonathan Riddell's discussion on irc on how our current repository
and release makes life harder for packagers -- basically a split up
repo would be easier, apparently.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, Sven Langkamp wrote:
This layout could be have some problems with the textshape which depends on
rdf. So I assume the textshape
would be in calligra-base which would make it depend on office.
I guess that the text shape's rdf support should be made a plugin then and
hav
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know we sort of decided to only do this after 2.9, but I just picked up
> Jonathan Riddell's discussion on irc on how our current repository and
> release makes life harder for packagers -- basically a split up repo would
> be ea
Hi,
I know we sort of decided to only do this after 2.9, but I just picked up
Jonathan Riddell's discussion on irc on how our current repository and
release makes life harder for packagers -- basically a split up repo
would be easier, apparently.
What would be a good split, though. My first
