Build failed in Jenkins: calligra_master » All,LINBUILDER #659

See Changes: [scripty] SVN_SILENT made messages (after extraction) -- [...truncated 11918 lines...] Building CXX object krita/plugins/paintops/libpaintop/CMakeFiles/kri

Re: 2.8.x maintenance plan and 2.9 ?

OK, Updated http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.8/Release_Plan and added a draft http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Schedules/2.9/Release_Plan On 24 June 2014 14:16, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > There is also an issue with the save as file dialogs in 2.8.4 that needs to > be fixed. > > > On

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/#review61230 --- This review has been submitted with commit 267d9da323dd366c3e

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/ --- (Updated June 29, 2014, 10:01 p.m.) Status -- This change has been m

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/#review61229 --- This review has been submitted with commit 0df735b52b3ca42aa2

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

I made by mistake by assuming Libreoffice use internal libwpd thing on Ubuntu, had a look at different distro I found most linux distros use as much system libs as possible. Multiple libwpd thing can be installed in parallel if don't build binary program and don't link libwpd-0.10.so to libwpd.so

Re: Review Request 118986: Show all possible file extensions in the file widget of database importer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118986/#review61227 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Adam Pigg On June 27, 2014, 11:08 p.m.

Re: Review Request 118986: Show all possible file extensions in the file widget of database importer

> On June 29, 2014, 9:33 p.m., Adam Pigg wrote: > > kexi/widget/KexiFileWidget.cpp, line 216 > > > > > > ?? I'll remove this outdated comment. - Jarosław -

Re: Review Request 118983: Fix crash and import failures for ODS import to Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118983/#review61224 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7f7a2482671e33dd07

Re: Review Request 118986: Show all possible file extensions in the file widget of database importer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118986/#review61223 --- kexi/widget/KexiFileWidget.cpp

Re: Review Request 118983: Fix crash and import failures for ODS import to Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118983/#review61222 --- This review has been submitted with commit 8251542da9e8d07ed8

Re: Review Request 118983: Fix crash and import failures for ODS import to Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118983/ --- (Updated June 29, 2014, 9:32 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 118983: Fix crash and import failures for ODS import to Kexi

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118983/#review61220 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Adam Pigg On June 27, 2014, 10:15 p.m.

Re: Review Request 118984: KoPart argument of KoDocument and descendants should not be optional

> On June 29, 2014, 4:45 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote: > > sheets/part/Doc.cpp, line 153 > > > > > > Not strictly necessary since DocBase::DocBase already has the same > > Q_ASSERT. If you want to keep it, I'm fine w

Re: Review Request 118984: KoPart argument of KoDocument and descendants should not be optional

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118984/ --- (Updated June 29, 2014, 9:14 p.m.) Review request for Calligra and Boudew

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/#review61213 --- Ship it! Good job! One thing, to avoid misleading the reader

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

On 29 June 2014 20:26, Yue Liu wrote: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, René J.V. wrote: >> On Sunday June 29 2014 10:42:07 Yue Liu wrote: >> >>>http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/2014-June/011310.html >> >> Thanks, I'd already begun to understand that much from the cmake output. >> T

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:47 AM, René J.V. wrote: > On Sunday June 29 2014 11:26:01 Yue Liu wrote: > >>They are released version. I'm not familiar with package structure on >>Ubuntu. LibreOffice use their own copy of those libraries, only >>software I know of using them other than Calligra is wri

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:02 AM, René J.V. wrote: > On Sunday June 29 2014 10:42:07 Yue Liu wrote: > >>http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/2014-June/011310.html > > Thanks, I'd already begun to understand that much from the cmake output. > The 0.1 libodfgen and 0.10 libwpd versions are s

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/calligra-devel/2014-June/011310.html On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:37 AM, René J.V. wrote: > On Sunday June 29 2014 14:40:49 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > >>Let me know what's missing and I'll get it updated. > > Check out https://launchpad.net/~rjvbertin/+archive/calligra-d

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/ --- (Updated June 29, 2014, 4:39 p.m.) Review request for Calligra, Adam Pigg

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/ --- (Updated June 29, 2014, 4:33 p.m.) Review request for Calligra, Adam Pigg

Re: Review Request 119002: Added focusing item after it is added in Kexi's report

> On June 28, 2014, 7:15 p.m., Adam Pigg wrote: > > Ship It! 2.8 and master? - Wojciech --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119002/#review61151 --

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 03:36:25PM +0200, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Sunday June 29 2014 14:14:25 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > >Calligra 2.8 is in the ubuntu archive, no PPA needed, including all the > >latest dependencies. Updates in the kubuntu-ppa/ppa updates PPA > > Last time I checked

Re: libetonyek, odfgen etc packages for ubuntu?

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 02:14:40PM +0200, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Hello, > > It's been a while, so I thought I'd do a git pull and rebuild my Calligra > packages. I've migrated to Kubuntu 14.04 since the last time, but I have the > impression that Calligra itself now requires newer versions of

Re: Review Request 118984: KoPart argument of KoDocument and descendants should not be optional

> On June 29, 2014, 4:45 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote: > > In general looks good. But shouldn't the same idea be used in the other > > apps too? > > Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > It's something that is going away in the mvc branch in any case. Ok. I would love to see the mvc branch merged as soon

Re: Review Request 118984: KoPart argument of KoDocument and descendants should not be optional

> On June 29, 2014, 4:45 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote: > > In general looks good. But shouldn't the same idea be used in the other > > apps too? It's something that is going away in the mvc branch in any case. - Boudewijn --- This is an au