Hi, all!
Last week I published a review request for making "(qtundo-format)" context
for undo strings controlled by type system of the compiler.
Here is the link to the review request:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118457/
It was reviewed positively by Jarosław and Thorsten. Is there anyone
> On June 4, 2014, 9:26 p.m., Juan Luis Boya García wrote:
> > That's probably not a bug. See you have set 768 ms as stabilization time.
> > This means the points painted will be the mean of those you actually drew
> > during the last 768 ms. That's a huge time frame and fast movements are
> >
Sure. I am on it, I will do it before Sunday. I was kind of stuck in
figuring out cmake way of doing things.
So compiling cpp file with JNI code needs JNI headers to be included and
Java binaries to be linked. I do like this when running my standalone code:
gcc -I/usr/lib64/jvm/java-7-openjdk/incl
On Friday June 06 2014 05:46:52 Inge Wallin wrote:
> Of all the category of bugs that the static code analysis can capture, are
> there one or a few that are extra important to fix? If so, then we could
> perhaps put up some wiki page with the analysis result for that type of bug.
First thing t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/118571/
---
(Updated June 6, 2014, 7:58 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra and Jarosła
