Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Sebastian Sauer
On 07/30/2013 08:47 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: On 30 July 2013 02:20, Sven Langkamp wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: I want to propose that we start porting Calligra to Qt 5.1 now that 2.7 is released. Jolla is funding KO GmbH to work on porting the core, so th

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Sebastian Sauer
On 07/30/2013 02:32 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Monday 29 July 2013 Jul 23:21:47 Dmitry Kazakov wrote: Btw, do the File Layers in Krita check that the file is changed on disk? Do they use some KIO thing for that? kdirnotify, as fast as I remember -- it's in kio: ./staging/kio/src/core/kdirn

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Àlex Fiestas
David is working on KIO for KF5, you should talk with him and check out what are his plans. If kio is a low tier framework, perhaps you want to ship it with calligra, since KIO is something that make any file-based app rock for powerusers. Anyway, check with him ! _

Re: Review Request 111747: stage uses modebox, modebox capable of horizontal mode, various fixes

2013-07-30 Thread C. Boemann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111747/ --- (Updated July 30, 2013, 2:48 p.m.) Review request for Calligra. Changes

Re: Review Request 111747: stage uses modebox, modebox capable of horizontal mode, various fixes

2013-07-30 Thread C. Boemann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111747/ --- (Updated July 30, 2013, 2:35 p.m.) Review request for Calligra. Changes

Re: Review Request 111044: Implement borders for shapes

2013-07-30 Thread C. Boemann
> On July 29, 2013, 2:06 p.m., C. Boemann wrote: > > The patch makes visual changes to more than 1000 files, but most are small > > offset problems, due to us adding 0.0 when there is no border. This can't > > be helped and is irrelevant anyway. > > > > But I did notice that > > > > www1.mvil

Re: Review Request 111044: Implement borders for shapes

2013-07-30 Thread C. Boemann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111044/#review36813 --- Ship it! Ship It! - C. Boemann On July 19, 2013, 6:26 a.m.,

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Cyrille Berger wrote: On 2013-07-30 13:07, C. Boemann wrote: Now as to which branch to use etc. I clearly recall the qt4/kde4 porting - it dragged on because things were not ready, but certainly also because we were still working on the qt3/kde3 version at the same time.

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 30 July 2013 02:20, Sven Langkamp wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> >> I want to propose that we start porting Calligra to Qt 5.1 now that 2.7 is >> released. Jolla is funding KO GmbH to work on porting the core, so this is a >> good moment to get started. On

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Cyrille Berger
On 2013-07-30 13:07, C. Boemann wrote: Now as to which branch to use etc. I clearly recall the qt4/kde4 porting - it dragged on because things were not ready, but certainly also because we were still working on the qt3/kde3 version at the same time. That is quiet wrong. We only had six months

Re: Notes on porting to Qt5

2013-07-30 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
2013/7/29 Boudewijn Rempt : [..] > * xmlgui > > Unless we re-implement (or clone from e.g. Qt Creator) the shortcut editor > and menu merging parts of xmlgui, we will need the xmlgui framework. See my > other mail for how much that drags in. Or we can copy the relevant classes > to kokdefakes... A

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Jos van den Oever
On 07/30/13 13:23, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Jos van den Oever wrote: The KIODevice : public QIODevice would have to have an async implementation like QTcpSocket and QProcess. No rocket science, but something to keep in mind. waitForReadyRead() and waitForBytesWritten() would

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013, Jos van den Oever wrote: The KIODevice : public QIODevice would have to have an async implementation like QTcpSocket and QProcess. No rocket science, but something to keep in mind. waitForReadyRead() and waitForBytesWritten() would be needed to block until KIO::FileJob giv

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Jos van den Oever
On 07/30/13 10:39, Cyrille Berger wrote: On 2013-07-30 00:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: And make the OSX port finally not suck. And make Android ports that aren't a hack possible. And yes, I want those Windows users, too. They are important. You should have all that with KF5 as well, so

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread C. Boemann
The choice is rather clear to me. Jolla is sponsoring a substantial porting effort - just for them or for us as well - do we really want to let that disappear into just an experiment - it will take us years to port at another time if done as a community effort. yes we would want to have kf5 tec

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Arjen Hiemstra
On Monday 29 July 2013 20:44:03 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > * check whether an autosave document belongs to another open instance of an > application * remote slideshow management for Stage > * IPC for the kioslaves. I need to check, though, there used to be an effort > to make kioslaves run in-proces

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Cyrille Berger
On 2013-07-30 00:01, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: And make the OSX port finally not suck. And make Android ports that aren't a hack possible. And yes, I want those Windows users, too. They are important. You should have all that with KF5 as well, so far the plan. And with Qt5.2 even bette

Re: Calligra 3.0 for Qt 5.1?

2013-07-30 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Monday 29 July 2013 Jul 23:24:52 Cyrille Berger wrote: > On a side note, we have been saying in the past that 3.0 was the user > ready version. So the question I have is whether 3.0 based on Qt5.1 will > be user ready ? > If not, I would suggest using the version 2.8. I don't see a reason to

Re: Review Request 111545: Port komain away from KParts

2013-07-30 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
> On July 23, 2013, 6:39 p.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > One issue I saw (as reported on irc): > > opening another file when one file has been created/loaded already does not > > start a new mainwindow with it. It seems loaded/imported, but is not shown. > > Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >

Re: Review Request 111615: Wrap KoShapeBackground in QSharedPointer

2013-07-30 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111615/ --- (Updated July 30, 2013, 7:23 a.m.) Status -- This change has been mar