On Saturday 23 February 2013 Feb, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> Looks like Inge and I did contacted him independently. He mentioned
> that it's still a long time till KDE Frameworks and that the checks
> are still valid for consistency reasons.
> In my opinion the visual difference is almost invisible an
Hi,
only two more weeks...
... and we will be in the middle of the Calligra Spring 2013 Sprint!
Everyone who was not yet noted her/his items to the agenda, hurry now to
http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Meetings/Spring_2013_Sprint/Agenda
and do it :)
People not physically present at t
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Jean-Nicolas Artaud
wrote:
>
>
>
> 2013/2/20 Sven Langkamp
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Inge Wallin wrote:
>> > As you may have noticed, I have taken some interest in EBN, the KDE
>> > static
>> > code checker[1]. One of the categories there is "Check
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109108/
---
Review request for Calligra and Shantanu Tushar.
Description
---
Foll
Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2013, 00:00:24 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
> Especially with the document-centric design of Calligra Active, where
eh, s/Calligra Active/Plasma Active/ here of course :)
Friedrich
___
calligra-devel mailing list
calligra-d
Hi Shantanu & all,
Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2013, 17:45:08 schrieb Shantanu Tushar:
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108996/#review27591
> --
> On Feb. 21, 2013, 10:07 p.m., C. Boemann wrote:
> > Ship It!
>
> Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> Well, no, please don't ship it. I need to be able to make packages for
> CentOS 6 still :-(
Yes, seen the requirement with CentOS 6 being Qt 4.6 only. Given that this is a
serious usecase, IMHO we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109082/
---
(Updated Feb. 22, 2013, 11:01 a.m.)
Review request for Calligra, C. Boeman
> On Feb. 22, 2013, 8:44 a.m., Inge Wallin wrote:
> > While I love this split in principle I can't help but wonder about what
> > will happen with the branches that we have active now. Will there be
> > massive conflicts and merge problems in the annotations branch? Or will
> > the merge be
> On Feb. 21, 2013, 10:07 p.m., C. Boemann wrote:
> > Ship It!
Well, no, please don't ship it. I need to be able to make packages for CentOS 6
still :-(
- Boudewijn
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http:/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109082/#review27883
---
While I love this split in principle I can't help but wonder ab
11 matches
Mail list logo
