On 10 February 2013 11:45, Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is my opinion on release schedule. First, we have to go back and think
> about why we do release ? And more important, to whom we do release ? For me,
> it is obvious that we primarly release to bring improvements to our users,
On Sunday 10 February 2013 11:50:26 Cyrille Berger Skott wrote:
> Now that I have said that. I guess the current problem is that the current
> policy for releases is to have four months between "branching". Instead, we
> could replace that policy by four months between the last major .0 release
> a
Now that I have said that. I guess the current problem is that the current
policy for releases is to have four months between "branching". Instead, we
could replace that policy by four months between the last major .0 release and
the next targetted release.
In this case that would mean, 2.7.0 r
Hi,
Here is my opinion on release schedule. First, we have to go back and think
about why we do release ? And more important, to whom we do release ? For me,
it is obvious that we primarly release to bring improvements to our users,
everything else is and should be a side effect.
== Targeting
