Re: Review Request 108631: Rename action "Insert Pictures..." to "Insert Pictures as Slides..."

2013-01-27 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108631/#review26279 --- This review has been submitted with commit af5ccfc778b2ceaa4a1

Re: Review Request 108631: Rename action "Insert Pictures..." to "Insert Pictures as Slides..."

2013-01-27 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108631/#review26278 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Thorsten Zachmann On Jan. 27, 2013, 7:0

Review Request 108631: Rename action "Insert Pictures..." to "Insert Pictures as Slides..."

2013-01-27 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108631/ --- Review request for Calligra and Thorsten Zachmann. Description --- Th

Re: RFC: Bumping min. KDE Platform version to 4.6.0

2013-01-27 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Sunday 27 January 2013 Jan, C. Boemann wrote: > Put like that I think it makes a lot of sense, and I would support it. > > I especially find it unlikely that people having qt 4.7 don't have at least > kde > platform 4.6 at least > > so all for it I'm totally in favour as well. -- Boudewij

Re: RFC: Bumping min. KDE Platform version to 4.6.0

2013-01-27 Thread C. Boemann
On Sunday 27 January 2013 17:28:11 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > while I was working on sheets/plugins/calendar/CalendarTool.cpp to fix the > code for the "deprecated!" warnings in there I wondered why we still depend > on KDE 4.3 as minimum platform, especially now that the min. requi

RFC: Bumping min. KDE Platform version to 4.6.0

2013-01-27 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, while I was working on sheets/plugins/calendar/CalendarTool.cpp to fix the code for the "deprecated!" warnings in there I wondered why we still depend on KDE 4.3 as minimum platform, especially now that the min. required Qt version has been bumped to Qt 4.7 Questions: * is anybody known to

Re: next release and release pace in general

2013-01-27 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 Jan, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > So, I'm torn. I cannot manage to create a buzz around krita every four > months, and Krita still needs lots of buzz. I also cannot square it with my > conscience to keep fixes and features from users for longer than strictly > necessary

Re: next release and release pace in general

2013-01-27 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
On 25 January 2013 18:16, Yuë Liu wrote: > We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master > branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the > features committed to and tested in testing branch thoroughly. So > master will always keep stable. This is done alrea

[UI] Outcomes of UI-related IRC discussions last Wednesday

2013-01-27 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
Hi, as ingwa suggested, I have put a summary of the outcomes of our UI discussions on IRC last Wednesday on the Wiki: Suggestions for the tool options are here: http://community.kde.org/Calligra/Usability_and_UX/Common/ToolOptionsSuggestions I've put the suggestions regarding annotations directly

Re: next release and release pace in general

2013-01-27 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Saturday 26 January 2013 09:42:57 Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Yuë Liu wrote: > > We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master > > branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the > > features committed to and tested in testin