Re: Review Request 108587: Don't interpret selection by tablet as move

2013-01-25 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108587/#review26192 --- What needs to be done to move the shape when it has been select

Re: Review Request 108586: remove Sheets::Doc::updateBorderButton(), currently endless loop and view-, not doc-related

2013-01-25 Thread Thorsten Zachmann
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108586/#review26191 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Thorsten Zachmann On Jan. 25, 2013, 11:

Re: Review Request 108509: Fix 313576: Use the doc of the correct part

2013-01-25 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108509/#review26190 --- This review has been submitted with commit 1b9153047e6f3ca0d1d

Re: Review Request 108491: Implement Undo command for Paragraph Settings

2013-01-25 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108491/#review26189 --- This review has been submitted with commit a30b879ae22eaa84f7a

Review Request 108588: unoverload KoReportItemBase::render(...)

2013-01-25 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108588/ --- Review request for Calligra, Adam Pigg and Jarosław Staniek. Description -

Review Request 108587: Don't interpret selection by tablet as move

2013-01-25 Thread Sven Langkamp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108587/ --- Review request for Calligra. Description --- When a shape is selected

Review Request 108586: remove Sheets::Doc::updateBorderButton(), currently endless loop and view-, not doc-related

2013-01-25 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108586/ --- Review request for Calligra and Marijn Kruisselbrink. Description ---

Re: Review Request 108579: remove file FindKOfficeLibs.cmake.in and a duplicated line for creating FindCalligraLibs.cmake

2013-01-25 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108579/#review26184 --- This review has been submitted with commit 7c23fe12dc90c1d60dd

Re: Review Request 108579: remove file FindKOfficeLibs.cmake.in and a duplicated line for creating FindCalligraLibs.cmake

2013-01-25 Thread Inge Wallin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108579/#review26183 --- Ship it! I don't think you even need to put this kind of obvio

Re: next release and release pace in general

2013-01-25 Thread Yuë Liu
We talked about having a testing branch before commit into master branch last year. We can restrict commit right to master, let the features committed to and tested in testing branch thoroughly. So master will always keep stable. On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Pierre Stirnweiss wrote: > > > On

Re: Review Request 108579: remove file FindKOfficeLibs.cmake.in and a duplicated line for creating FindCalligraLibs.cmake

2013-01-25 Thread Yue Liu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108579/#review26181 --- One more duplication in the install command in line 6 - Yue Li

Review Request 108579: remove file FindKOfficeLibs.cmake.in and a duplicated line for creating FindCalligraLibs.cmake

2013-01-25 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108579/ --- Review request for Calligra. Description --- Seems that in the switch

Re: Review Request 108569: Flake ConfigWidgets and user friendly interface

2013-01-25 Thread Jean-Nicolas Artaud
> On Jan. 24, 2013, 2:48 p.m., Arjen Hiemstra wrote: > > Quite nice, a good improvement on the existing UI. I have a bunch of > > comments on some of the details though. Thank you very much for this precise review. It will take me some time to correct all these points, but I'm on it, and I'll