On Thursday, April 19, 2012 13:48:52 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so here my list of issues that I have had with ODF so far. Please consider
> putting them on the table for the plugfest as well as for the TC call :)
>
>
> A) no official test suite
> B) spec vs. reality: how to handle files from broken O
> On March 3, 2012, 1:11 p.m., Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > Was this already pushed?
Seems like this patch has been committed already and the review request can be
close.
KWViewModeNormal.cpp:27:#define GAP 20
- Thorsten
---
This is an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104677/#review12729
---
This review has been submitted with commit
11a852fda159100b305
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104677/#review12728
---
This review has been submitted with commit
9f3b7f62947ccda2335
Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> int n = name.indexOf(' ');
> -if (n != -1) {
> +if (n > -1) {
> kDebug(30518) << "Sheet name converting:" << name;
> -name[n] == '_';
> +name.replace(' ','_');
> kDebug(30518) << "Sheet name converted:" << name;
> }
> -name =
Git commit c804712c97b24a3774a53a3825f50762089f1f49 by Boudewijn Rempt.
Committed on 20/04/2012 at 16:35.
Pushed by rempt into branch 'master'.
Make calligra compile with clang
Clang has some additional restriction.
if (foo = bar) becomes if ((foo = bar)), while (foo=bar) while ((foo=bar))
and i
I have compiled Calligra on FreeBSD with Clang, which is now part of the base
system as alternative to gcc. In doing so, I have put together a set of patches
to quiet some warning and quell some errors as Clang's parser is more strict
than gcc. Some of the warnings led me to correct subtle erro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104677/#review12723
---
Ship it!
Also to 2.4, please!
- Boudewijn Rempt
On April 19
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Matus Uzak wrote:
Hello,
a comment from filters point of view:
> In regards to the test sets: I would really prefer to have a test set that
> easily calculates a score for each product. That is however quite some work.
> We have some tests in calligra, that would be better
Hello,
a comment from filters point of view:
> In regards to the test sets: I would really prefer to have a test set that
> easily calculates a score for each product. That is however quite some
work.
> We have some tests in calligra, that would be better to have outside
Calligra.
http://websvn.
On Thursday 19 April 2012 13:48:52 PM Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> so here my list of issues that I have had with ODF so far. Please consider
> putting them on the table for the plugfest as well as for the TC call :)
I have brought up some points in the discussion.
> A) no official test suit
I'm in the middle of a rather tricky refactoring, so it'll be a day before
I can play with branches again. Same goes for Gopal's review request,
actually.
Boudewijn
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.re
> On April 19, 2012, 6:23 a.m., Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> > It looks good to me. Krita doesn't need a tab chooser. (Well, technically,
> > it could be useful if the active shape on a vector layer is a text shape,
> > but I'm not sure that's something our users really care about.)
For consistenc
I did not use the plugin recently, thought it was working fine. I will
check what is the problem in the plugin. Though I am not active in taking
part in conversations, I read most of the mails from the mailing list.
Please redirect me if you get any issues regarding it.
Thanks,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2
14 matches
Mail list logo
